Cases

WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Jessica Tullos appeals the order modifying child custody and support of her minor children. The order awarded her former husband, James Tullos, physical custody of both minor children and required Jessica to pay child support. It is from that order that this appeal is taken.

MOORE, J. | ¡In these two consolidated appeals, the defendants, Lamondre Tucker and Alicia Tucker, appeal their convictions for conspiracy to commit jury tampering, a violation of La. R.S. 14:26 and La. R.S. 14:129. Alicia Tucker appeals her sentence of 15 years. For the following reasons, we affirm the convictions and sentences. Facts Lamondre Markes Tucker and his mother, Alicia Ann

The petitioner’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 125 Conn. App. 584 (AC 32132), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the neglect petition?” McLACHLAN and EVELEIGH, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted 1 his no-contest plea convictions of felonious assault, MCL 750.82, and domestic violence, MCL 750.81(2). Defendant was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to 119 days, time served, for the felonious assault conviction, and 93 days, time served,

ORDER PER CURIAM. Ronald Tucker appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062,1 and two counts of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and discern no plain error. State v. Speaks,

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge. | ,This is an appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of appellants Larry and Jessica Tucker to their three minor children, J.T.l, D.T., and J.T.2. Appellants have filed separate appeals arguing that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s findings that they failed to remedy the conditions that caused the removal of the children and that termination

LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: and this Court appointed Judge Franklin McKenzie as special chancellor. *600¶ 1. The Mississippi Legislature passed a law mandating that the revenue the Pas-cagoula School District (“PSD”) collected from ad valorem taxes levied on liquified natural gas terminals and crude oil refineries be distributed to all school districts in th

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 525 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-22-724 GABRIEL LONDON Opinion Delivered November 15, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13408 SJC-13409 COMMONWEALTH vs. CASSANDRA L. BARLOW-TUCKER. C

FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., HODGES and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 5, 202

08/29/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 1, 2024 IN RE TUCKER R. ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Jefferson County No. 22-00735 Dennis “Will” Roach, II, Judge ___________________________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0203 Filed January 13, 2017 PAULA SEGURA and RICARDO SEGURA, Appellants, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Marsha A. Bergan, Judge. Plaintiffs seek further review of a court of appeals decision affirming the district court’s order dismissing their cl

BLEICH, J. (Pro Tempore ) This action was filed by Plaintiff, John David Knight, under the Louisiana Wage Payment Act ("LWPA"), seeking unpaid wages/salary, accrued vacation, expenses, and overtime compensation, as well as penalty wages, interest, and attorney fees from Defendants, Barney Tucker and Donald, Tucker, Betts, Fuller & Knight, A.P.A.C. In a previous appeal, this Court: (1) acknowledged the trial court's determination

BLEICH, J. (Pro Tempore ) This action was filed by Plaintiff, John David Knight, under the Louisiana Wage Payment Act ("LWPA"), seeking unpaid wages/salary, accrued vacation, expenses, and overtime compensation, as well as penalty wages, interest, and attorney fees from Defendants, Barney Tucker and Donald, Tucker, Betts, Fuller & Knight, A.P.A.C. In a previous appeal, this Court: (1) acknowledged the trial court's determination

HILL, J.: Convicted by a jury of the murder of Quantez Greer and the attempted armed robbery of Jessica Power, Walter Tucker appeals, claiming the trial judge erred by (1) denying his motion for directed verdict; (2) admitting prior bad act evidence against him in violation of Rules 403 and 404, SCRE ; and (3) denying his motion for a new trial and refusing to hold a full evidentiary hearing on his claim of juror misconduct. We affi

165 Ariz. 340 (1990) 798 P.2d 1349 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. James Thomas TUCKER, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 12234. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. March 27, 1990. As Corrected March 28, 1990. Reconsideration Denied May 25, 1990. Review Denied November 6, 1990.

Judgment rendered March 3, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,777-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** EMANUEL FLINTROY,

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Tempest Horsley’s application to possess an Illinois Firearm Owner’s Identification Card, commonly known as a “FOID card,” was returned to her as incomplete because she was over 18 but not yet 21 and her application did not contain a parent or guardian signature. Although she could have under Illinois law, she did not seek further review from the Direc

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1411 CAF 13-01604 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP MARACLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JESSICA R. DESCHAMPS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. TRONOLONE & SURGALLA, P.C., BUFFALO (DAVID C. CROWTHER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RES

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00281-CV David E. Jones, Appellant v. Jessica L. Jones, Appellee FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-13-001139, THE HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORA