Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jessica Nicole Johnson”
Nance, Jessica Nicolepublic domain
May 29, 2015 PD-0197-15 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS JESSICA NICOLE NANCE, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CAUSE NUMBER CR 1101695 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.
Nance, Jessica Nicolepublic domain
PD-0197-15 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS JESSICA NICOLE NANCE APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CAUSE NUMBER CR1101695 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.
Nance, Jessica Nicolepublic domain
H7-/S" PD-0197-15 ORIGINAL IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS JESSICA NICOLE NANCE, APPELLANT VS. THE STATE
Jessica Nicole Nance v. Statepublic domain
NO. 06-13-00223-CR RECEiVED IN FILCO IN ^ ^th^ST'3 IN THE COURT 0F APPEALS ^gSK'wliSf3* £c f:JS) Texarkana, Texas < * SIXTH DISTRICT DEC 29201,f Debra Autrey, Clerk TEXARKANA, TEXAS Tawtfana, Texas FHhrat H'lrcy, Cflji
People v. Johnsonpublic domain
183 Cal.App.4th 253 (2010) 107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 228 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH TERRELL JOHNSON et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. C055139. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. March 30, 2010. *260 Deborah L. Hawkins, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant a
In Re: Kristen Nicole Dennis and Jessica Falcon Dennis Applying for Intrafamily Adoption of J.K.D.public domain
Judgment rendered July 17, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,851-JAC COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Nelson v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.public domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES I. COHN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification [DE 51] (“Motion”). The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, Defendant’s Opposition [DE 64], Plaintiffs Reply [DE 75], has heard argument of counsel in open court on the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises.
Alvin Johnson, Sr. v. Anna Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-01080-COA CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2018-CA-01416-COA ALVIN JOHNSON, SR. APPELLANT v. ANNA JOHNSON APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/27/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DENI
Pace v. Edel-Harrelsonpublic domain
SHAPIRO, P.J. In this employment termination case, plaintiff Barbara Pace appeals by right the trial court order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants under MCR 2.116(0(10) (no genuine issue of material fact) on plaintiffs two claims: (1) that her employment was terminated in violation of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq.,
Alvin Johnson, Sr. v. Anna Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01416-COA ALVIN JOHNSON, SR. APPELLANT v. ANNA JOHNSON APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/28/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DENISE OWENS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
Tiffany Nicole Walton v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 26, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00725-CR <
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
352 S.W.3d 224 (2011) Leon Charles JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 14-10-00292-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). September 29, 2011. *225 Nicole Wignall Deborde, Houston, for appellant. Michelle R. Townsend, Houston, for state. Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Ju
Debbie Johnson Archie v. Amos Archie, Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-01370-COA DEBBIE JOHNSON ARCHIE APPELLANT v. AMOS ARCHIE, JR. APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/14/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DENISE OWENS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
State of Tennessee v. Damon Johnsonpublic domain
04/27/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 3, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAMON JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 17-04436, C1704748 W. Mark Ward, Judge ___________________________________
In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative Litigationpublic domain
OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: Presently before the Court is a motion to approve the final settlement reached between Plaintiffs-shareholders and nominal Defendant J & J Corporation (“J & J”) in several consolidated shareholder derivative actions, as well as motions to intervene and dismiss by an objector to the settlement. Through the settlement, J & J agrees to institute corporate go
889 F.Supp. 1431 (1995) DODGER'S BAR & GRILL, d/b/a Bonita Flats Saloon, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The JOHNSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-2289-EEO. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 15, 1995. *1432 *1433 *1434
Xavier Johnson v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion issued January 25, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00505-CR ——————————— XAVIER JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF T
498 F.Supp.2d 389 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This document relates to: United States of America ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Dey, Inc., et al., Defendant. MDL No. 1456, Master File No. 01-12257-PBS, Civil Action No. 05-11084-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 17, 2007.
A23-1422 Nicole Lynn Albertson and On Behalf of Minor Children v. Bruce Wayne Albertson, ...public domain
This opinion is nonprecedential except as provided by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(c). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A23-1421 A23-1422 Nicole Lynn Albertson and On Behalf of Minor Children, Respondent,
McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. This case originally was set for oral argument before this panel on May 13,1996. On May 1, 1996, the parties filed with this court a stipulation for submission of the case on the briefs. On May 7, 1996, this panel, after examining the briefs and the appellate record, determined that oral argument would not materially assist the decisional proc