⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jessica Lynn Rollings”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-12-02 · Published · cited 31× · 982 F.3d 266
Case: 19-40605 Document: 00515658372 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 2, 2020
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 19-40605 Document: 00515661850 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2020 REVISED United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
09/11/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 28, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID LYNN RICHARDS, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108766 Steven W. Sword, Judge _______________________________
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2016-04-14 · Published · cited 1× · 180 F. Supp. 3d 944; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50233; 2016 WL 1464573
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Before the court is the Motion to Suppress [Dkt. #16] of defendant Jessica Lynn Nealis. Nealis moves to suppress evidence obtained during the warrantless search of her purse and vehicle by hotel staff and law enforcement officials with the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. I. BACKGROUND
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 OK 68
IN THE MATTER OF STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2023 OK 68Case Number: SCBD-7261Decided: 06/12/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 68, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. IN THE MAT
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 OK 54
IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2022 OK 54Case Number: SCBD-7059Decided: 06/06/2022As Corrected: June 9, 2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 54, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
State v. Toccopublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1988-02-23 · Published · cited 47× · 750 P.2d 874; 156 Ariz. 116; 2 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5; 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 40
156 Ariz. 116 (1988) 750 P.2d 874 STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Joseph Frank TOCCO, Appellee. No. CR-87-0032-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. February 23, 1988. *117 Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Jessica Gifford Funkhouser, Cameron H. Holmes, Asst. Attys. Gen., Phoenix, for appellant. Slat
Indiana Supreme Court · 2019-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 122 N.E.3d 446
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 14, 2019, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv
Indiana Supreme Court · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 96 N.E.3d 572
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 15, 2018, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv
State v. Baileypublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 831 S.E.2d 894; 267 N.C. App. 53
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-1187 Filed: 20 August 2019 Carteret County, No. 17 CRS 51572 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. NICHOLAS OMAR BAILEY, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 10 July 2018 by Judge Charles H. Henry in Carteret County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 April 2019. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Ass
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-02-02 · Published · cited 1× · 24 F.4th 1069
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0020p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MEMPHIS CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH;
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 OK 44
OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2018 OK 44Case Number: SCBD-6659Decided: 06/04/2018THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2018 OK 44, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICA
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015-10-15 · Published · cited 12× · 139 F. Supp. 3d 804; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140371; 2015 WL 5999831
RULING AND ORDER JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA This Court sua sponte ordered Defendant Kirby Inland Marine, LP to show cause within fourteen days as to why this Court should not remand this action in light of Harrold v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., CIV.A. 13-762, 2014 WL 5801673 (M.D.La.2014), (Doc. 4). Subsequently, Defen
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015-07-25 · Published · cited 10× · 309 F.R.D. 251; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97464; 2015 WL 4522863
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Docket Entry #341], Defendants’ Response and Brief on Price Impact [Docket Entry # 572], and Plaintiffs’ Price Impact Memorandum [Docket Entry # 594]. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, only with respect to the
Green v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 25 So. 3d 1086; 2010 Miss. App. LEXIS 3; 2010 WL 11265
GRIFFIS, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. Verenzo Green was convicted of conspiracy to commit a crime. He was sentenced to five years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (“MDOC”). Green appeals the conviction. He claims that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a new trial because the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. We find no error and affirm.
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 64× · 338 F. Supp. 3d 284
NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tara Casey ("Plaintiff"), instituted this putative class action by filing a federal complaint on March 24, 2017, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. (See Compl. (ECF No. 1).) Plaintiff asserts that defendants Odwalla, Inc. ("Odwalla") and The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") (collectively, "Defendants") violated the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1983 (t
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017-06-13 · Published · cited 36× · 375 Wis. 2d 572; 2017 WI 58; 895 N.W.2d 796; 2017 WL 2558878; 2017 Wisc. LEXIS 303
¶ 1. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J.1 This is a review of an unpublished per curiam decision of the *577court of appeals affirming the judgment of conviction by the circuit court for Lafayette County, James R. Beer, Judge.2 The criminal charges arose out of a confrontation between the defendant an
Indiana Supreme Court · 2017-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 96 N.E.3d 554
On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-03-14 · Published · cited 0× · 169 F. Supp. 3d 6; 2016 WL 1048761; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32010
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge In this case, Plaintiffs Animal Legal Defense Fund, Tracey Kuehl, and Lisa Kuehl challenge the United States Department of Agriculture’s 2015 renewal of the license for the operation of the Cricket Hollow Zoo. The Cricket Hollow Zoo is a private zoo in Manchester, Iowa, which includes lion
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016-05-27 · Published · cited 6× · 190 F. Supp. 3d 588; 2016 A.M.C. 1651; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69912; 2016 WL 3027430
SECTION: “J”(2) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CARL J. BARBIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter came on for trial before the Court, sitting in admiralty without a jury, on May 16 and 17, 2016. Having considered the testimony and exhibits introduced at trial and applicable law, the Court issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Fede