Cases

WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Jessica Tullos appeals the order modifying child custody and support of her minor children. The order awarded her former husband, James Tullos, physical custody of both minor children and required Jessica to pay child support. It is from that order that this appeal is taken.

ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court are four motions: (1) Third-Party Defendants’ and Declaratory Counter-Claimants, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London’s (“Excess Underwriters”) Motion for Summary Judgment as to, the claim for coverage by A.B.C. Marine Towing, LLC (“ABC Marine”) (R. Doc. 67)1; (2) ABC Marine’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Jud

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–0769 Submitted September 10, 2025—Filed December 23, 2025 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Lynn Melvin Lindaman, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Charles C. Sinnard (motion to suppres

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS City of Kenova, West Virginia Petitioner FILED May 26, 2020 vs) No. 19-0919 (PSC Case No. 18-1232-S-C) released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH

y'iP l Li E Tfiiso^^jon was filed for record onfmin^ \ nATg/TlO/U 11,3c?l^ /^\//^ IiuiaaaA'• —C— ■■ '^' ' SUSAN L. CARLSON I SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE

762 F.Supp.2d 1201 (2011) Holly HANSON, an individual, and John Rennel, an individual, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Does 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 10-06945 SJO (RCx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 18, 2011.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 12, 2005 Session JESSICA RENEE RICHARDS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Cumberland County No. 6692 Lillie Ann Sells, Judge No. E2004-02326-CCA-R3-PC AND JENNIFER LYNN

ORDER Neil Y. Wake, United States District Judge This action challenges Arizona’s way of executing death row inmates. Before the court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, argued on April 7, 2016. (Doc. 98.) The motion will be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs are seven Arizona death row inmates and the First Amendment Coalition of Arizona

OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: This quotidian bankruptcy case presents a novel question: can a non-Article III bankruptcy judge enter a final judgment in a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to the bankruptcy estate? Federal law empowers bankruptcy judges to do so, but we hold that the Constitution forbids it. The Exe

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. BRANDON LOCKE, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cr-00210-TSE-1) Argued: M

IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2022 OK 55Case Number: SCBD-7261Decided: 06/06/2022As Corrected: June 9, 2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 55, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

520 F.Supp.2d 954 (2007) Gregory HACKMAN d/b/a Gregory Hackman Realtors, and Gregory Hackman Realtors, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DICKERSON REALTORS, INC., an Illinois corporation d/b/a. Dickerson-Neiman Realtors, Whitehead, Inc., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Whitehead Realtors, Premier Real Estate Brokerage Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Coldwell Banker Premier, Century 21 Country North, Inc., an Illinois corpo

(2008) Gregory HACKMAN d/b/a Gregory Hackman Relators, and Gregory Hackman Realtors, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DICKERSON REALTORS, INC, an Illinois corporation d/b/a Dickerson-Neiman Realtors, Whitehead, Inc., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Whitehead Realtors, R. Crosby, Incorporated, an Illinois corporation d/b/a Prudential Crosby Realtors, McKiskilewis, Inc., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Tom McKiski Realtors, Lori Reavis, Ra

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 02-OCT-2019 03:40 PM SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX

643 F.Supp.2d 861 (2009) Johnica Lynn PRYOR, v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID. Civil Action No. 6:08cv247. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. February 9, 2009. *864 Winston E. Cochran, Jr., Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Johnica Lynn Pryor. Jessica Michelle Hartsell, Texas Attorney General, Austin, TX, for D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Defendant. FINDING OF LIABILITY For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion, the Court hereby GRANTS the plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. Specifically, the Court holds as follows: 1. As to Count I, defendant the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) is LIABLE to the following plaintiffs: (1) Steven Vernier, Jr.; (2

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE [34] AND MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AND THIRD CAUSES OF ACTION [32] DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge. Julie Barrera, Courtroom Clerk. Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Strike Marketing, Advertising, and Warranty Allegations and Exhibits in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Strike”)

790 F.Supp.2d 1215 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Elven Joe SWISHER, Defendant-Movant. Case Nos. 1:09-CV-055-BLW, 1:07-CR-182-BLW. United States District Court, D. Idaho. April 10, 2011. Decision Denying Motion for Reconsideration July 28, 2011. *1221 Elven Joe Swisher, Cottonwood, ID,

156 Ariz. 110 (1986) 750 P.2d 868 STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Joseph Frank TOCCO, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CR 7480. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D. December 2, 1986. Reconsideration Granted and Opinion Modified January 15, 1988. *111 Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Ste

BY THE COURT: On June 29, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers jointly promulgated the Clean Water Rule, 80 Fed. Reg. 37054 (June 29, *1320 2015), which defines the term “Waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. The next