Cases

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I agree with most of what Justice Page has said in his dissent, but I write separately for two reasons. The first is to articulate a different basis for my disagreement with the majority’s analysis. The second is to underscore my conclusion that, much like in League of Women Voters v. Ritchie, 819 N.W.2d 636 (Minn.2012), the majority fai

741 N.W.2d 329 (2007) PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse Leon RITCHIE, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 134700. COA No. 277167. Supreme Court of Michigan. November 29, 2007. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has fa

This is a tax case. S L Beverages and Blends, Inc. (S L) filed a complaint in the circuit court against the Director of the Department of Revenue of Jefferson County and the members of the Jefferson County Commission (County), claiming that the County should not be permitted to charge its gross receipts tax on the forty-eight percent liquor taxes paid by S L to the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC Board). The County filed a counterclaim for all amounts due and owin

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before CAMPANELLA, HERRING, and PENLAND Appellate Military Judges LK, by and through Captain MEGHAN GORMAN, Special Victim Counsel, Petitioner v. Lieutenant Colonel LANNY J. ACOSTA Jr., U.S. Army, Military Judge, Respondent

OPINION PER CURIAM. On June 5, 2012, the last day of the filing period for elective office, petitioner Jesse Pfliger filed with the Secretary of State’s office an affidavit of candidacy as the Republican candidate for Minnesota State Senate, District 61. Minnesota Statutes § 204B.06, subd. lb (2010), requires, among other things, that an affidavit of candidacy include “a telephone number where the candida

218 Cal.App.2d 124 (1963) R. J. CARDINAL COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JESS M. RITCHIE et al., Defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 20686. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. July 11, 1963. Hannon & Hannon and Robert E. Hannon for Defendants and Appellants. Broad, Busterud & Khourie and Michael M. Khourie for Plaintiff and

EATON, J. ¶ 1. For 120 years, Vermont has recognized that the unsightliness of a thing, without more, does not render it a nuisance under the law. See Woodstock Burial Ground Ass'n v. Hager , 68 Vt. 488 ,

Affirming. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Perry Circuit Court. Appellant is an ex-policeman of the city of Hazard, and he brought this suit on behalf of himself and other policemen and ex-policemen similarly situated. Duke v. Boyd County, 225 Ky. 112, 7 S .W. 2d 839. He alleges that he, and the other policemen for whom he sues, arrested seven hundred and fifty persons for violation of the Rash-Gullion Act, Acts 1922, c. 33, and that the coun

VICTORY, J.* |,We granted the taxpayer’s writ application to clarify the proper procedure and time period for appeals when the tax collector has failed to act on a refund claim for overpayment of taxes after one year, and to determine whether the taxpayer was required to use the payment under protest procedure in this case in order to obtain a refund. After reviewing the record and the applicable

KUHN, J. 12Taxpayer-appellant, TIN, Inc. (TIN), appeals the trial court’s judgment, which sustained peremptory exceptions of prescription and peremption, among other things, filed by the tax collector-defendants, Washington Parish and Sheriff Robert J. “Bobby” Crowe in his official capacity as the Ex-Officio Tax Sales and Use Collector for all taxing authorities located in Washington Parish (collectively the tax collector) a

233 S.W.3d 674 (2006) McLANE SOUTHERN, INC., Appellant, v. Charlie DAVIS, Director of the Arkansas Tobacco Control Board, and the Arkansas Tobacco Control Board, Appellees, Warren Wholesale Co., Inc., Tom Fitts Tobacco Co., Inc., Douglas Companies, Inc., Glidewell Distributing Co., Inc., Southern Wholesale, Inc., Ritchie Grocer Co., Inc., Northwest Tobacco and Candy Co., Merritt Wholesale Distributor, Inc., and Warehouse Distributing, Inc., I

Barclay, J. — This is a suit in equity to set aside a quitclaim deed, made by plaintiff, Mr. Warren, to defendant, Mr. Ritchie. The deed is of date, August 20, 1890, and purports to convey plaintiff’s interest in one hundred and twenty acres of land in Wright county. The grounds of the suit are that the deed was obtained by representations regarding the condition and value of the land and of its title, which we

ORDER We have consolidated for decision these three appeals because they all raise the same issue: whether fleeing an officer in violation of Wisconsin Statute § 346.04(3) constitutes a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924, or a “crime of violence” under the career offender guidelines, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. The term “violent felony” under the ACCA and “crime of violence” under the career offen

ORDER We have consolidated for decision these three appeals because they all raise the same issue: whether fleeing an officer in violation of Wisconsin Statute § 346.04(3) constitutes a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924, or a “crime of violence” under the career offender guidelines, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. The term “violent felony” under the ACCA and “crime of violence” under the career offen

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) filed a joint discovery letter in which Sy-nopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to interrogatories. [Docket No. 811 (Joint Letter) ]. ATopTech argues that it already answered Synopsys’s Set One, Interrogatory Nos. 1-5, which contains at least 21 di

Gordon McCloud, J. ¶1 The city of Yakima claims the protection of statutes that were designed to protect the rights of those who engage in First Amendment protected communicative activity. U.S. Const, amend. I. Those statutes — Washington’s “anti-SLAPP”1 laws — protect speakers against frivolous, speech-chilling lawsuits. We hold that a governmental entity like Yakima cannot take advantage of the ant

PER CURIAM. In an action for treble damages for violations by appellees of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 15) and the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2), the district court awarded the corporate appellant Roy Darden Industries, Inc., $45,000, “being treble the damages sustained” by that company as a result of the unlawful acts of th

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED August 14, 2024 JASON C., ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Petitioner Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 39.022(5)(c)(3), Fla. Stat. (1991); see also Ritchie v. State, 670 So.2d 924 (Fla.1996). PALMER, MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

MEMORANDUM ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge. In this action plaintiff Knox Porcelain Corporation (hereinafter the Company) seeks to vacate an arbitration award. The case is presently before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The facts are not in dispute. Mary Brantley was employed by the Company and its predecessor since 1961. At all times relevant to this case, a co