Cases

OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. Jesse Nathahiel Pehn, Jr., was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). After opening statements at Penn’s trial, the District Court removed one of the jurors, a student with scheduled surgery, replacing him with an alternate. Penn now appeals, arguing that removing' the juro

SMITH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the majority’s reversal of the unjust-enrichment judgment. See supra Part II.B. However, I disagree with majority’s decision to vacate and remand the defamation judgment for a new trial because of references to insurance in trial testimpny and closing argument. See supra Part II.A.

Case: 14-50794 Document: 00513241119 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-50794 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. JESSE DOMINGUEZ, Defendant - Appellant CONSOLIDATED WITH 14-50823 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. CRYSTAL DOERR, Defendant - Appellant

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00811-CR Jesse Sedillo a/k/a Jesse Sedillo, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CR-21-202862, DENISE HERNANDEZ, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case: 13-30185 Document: 00512827353 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 5, 2014 No. 13-30185

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-01104-COA JESSE SMITH A/K/A JESSE SCOTT SMITH APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/22/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAVID H. STRONG JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTOR

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge In 2014, plaintiff Gregory Smith was held at the D.C. jail for twenty-three days after a judge ordered that he be released. The District of Columbia has not suggested that there was any legal justification for this undisputed "overdetention"; what is at stake is whether plaintiff has founded his claims for redress on the appropriate legal theories, and whether he has come forward with

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. Connie Jean Smith was the named plaintiff in a class action suit against Southwestern Energy Company ("Southwestern") and three of its subsidiaries alleging underpayment of gas royalties. The defendants prevailed at trial. Smith now appeals, arguing that a new trial is warranted because of the district court's

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. In this appeal four groups of prospective intervenors-the Arnett I, Arnett II, Charter Land Co. LLC, and Wyborny appellants-challenge the district court's 1 denials of their motions to intervene in a class action lawsuit by named plaintiff Connie Jean Smith against SEECO, Inc.,

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Apr 28 2020, 8:52 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

NAHMIAS, Justice, concurring. I join the Court’s opinion in full, as it properly applies current Georgia law in answering the two questions presented. But I write to express concern about an issue lurking in today’s decision. As the Court explains, our opinion in First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Kunes, 230 Ga. 888 (199 SE2d 776) (1973), equated guarantors of loans secured by re

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, a number of North Florida farmers, claim that their watermelon crops *1298were damaged when plastic mulch manufactured by Defendant Poly Expert, Inc. degraded prematurely. ECF No. 61, at 6 ¶¶ 18-21. It turns out that the premature degradation may have bee

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs appeals the decision of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals (Veterans Court) in Smith v. Principi 3 Vet.App. 378 (1992), holding that otherwise final decisions of the Board of Veterans Appeals (Board) are subject to collateral review for “clear and unmistakable error” (CUE) under 38 C.F.R. §

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESSE JUNIOR QUINTANILLA PINAULA (aka Jesse Quintanilla Pinaula Jr.), Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No. CRA23-014 Superior Court Case No. CF0185-23

Opinion issued May 1, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The

HULL, Circuit Judge: Appellant Jamil Al-Amin (“Al-Amin” or “Plaintiff’) appeals the district court’s 1 grant of Appellees Hugh Smith and Sanche Martin’s (“Defendants”) motion in limine. The district court concluded that 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) precluded Al-

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 202 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISIONS I & II No. CV-23-172 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF Opinion Delivered March 13, 2024 MINOR CHILD APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON RANDELL G. SHELTON, JR. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

POLITZ, Chief Judge: Jesse Aguirre, Sr., convicted upon his guilty plea of possession with intent to distribute in excess of 100 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), appeals the sentence imposed. Finding no error, we affirm. Background On March 4, 1992,

664 S.E.2d 499 (2008) 52 Va. App. 469 Justin Jesse MIDDLEBROOKS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 1484-07-1. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Chesapeake. August 5, 2008. *500 Steven C. Frucci (Christie, Kantor, Griffin & Smith, P.C., on brief), Virginia Beach, for appellant. Richard B. Smith,

161 P.3d 314 (2007) 2007 OK 45 Jeffrey J. SMITH, M.D., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DEACONESS HOSPITAL; Deaconess Health System, LLC, Triad Hospitals, Inc. and Deaconess Health Care Corporation d/b/a Deaconess Hospital; Kenneth Whittington, M.D.; Paul Dougherty; Susan M. Harmon, M.D.; Philip R. Palmer, M.D.; Matthew T. Draelos, M.D.; Ingrid W. Jackson, M.D.; Paul D. Rothwell, M.D.; William J. Fors, M.D.; Wade McCoy, M.D.; Joey