Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CP-01094-COA JERRY UNDRE STEWART A/K/A DUKE A/K/A APPELLANT JERRY STEWART v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/14/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM HUNTER NOWELL COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI FRANKLIN COLLECTION SERVICE, INC. AND UNKNOWN ATTORNEY “A” v. NO. 2002-IA-00591-SCT JERRY STEWART AND LEOLA STEWART CONSOLIDATED WITH FRANKLIN COLLECTION SERVICE, INC. AND ATTORNEY T. DALE BEAVERS v. NO. 2002-IA-00592-SCT R. D. MALONE CONSOLIDATED WITH FRANKLIN COLLECTION SERVICE, INC. AND ATTORNEY JEFFREY WALDO v.

334 S.W.3d 732 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry STEWART, Appellant. No. ED 94345. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. March 15, 2011. Alexa I. Pearson, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Timothy A. Blackweh, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Presiding Judge.

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00035-CR ___________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 35949 VERNON JERRY MORTENSEN, ) ) Coeur d’Alene, April 2010 Term Plaintiff/Appellant, ) v. ) 2010 Opinion No. 47 ) STEWART TITLE GUARANTY ) Filed: April 26,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session THE SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY and THE ANTHEM CASUALTY INSURANCE GROUP, v. HENRY MATHES, JOANN MATHES and JERRY STEWART Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 32350 Hon. Jean A. Stanley, Judge FILED JULY 27, 2000

THAPAR, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which LARSEN, J., joined. MOORE, J. (pp. 429-36), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. *424 Underfunded public pensions are a vexing public-policy issue. See generally Jack M. Beermann, The Public Pension Crisis

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Public and private pension plans alike often include cost-of-living adjustments to base benefits so that plan participants can receive the real value of those benefit's. One way to calculate such adjustments is to make them dependent on yearly changes in the consumer price index. For more than four decades, the Tennessee Valle

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether words spoken by an admitted former member of a California gang to a group of Arizona gang members could properly be punished by state law or, instead, fell within the protective ambit of the First Amendment. I Jerry Dean McCoy was indicted in Arizona Superior Court on one count o

85 S.W.3d 29 (2002) Jerry STEWART, Appellant, v. WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Respondent. No. WD 60332. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 28, 2002. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 22, 2002. Application for Transfer Denied October 22, 2002. *30 Bruce B. Brown,

375 B.R. 689 (2007) In re Ashley S. STEWART, Debtor. No. 06-2115-JAF. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. September 17, 2007. *690 Douglas C. Higginbotham, Jacksonville, FL, for Debtor. Nina M. LaFleur, St. Augustine, FL, for Trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW</

PER CURIAM: Defendant-Appellant Jerry Stewart appeals the sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to charges of possession of child pornography and possession of stolen property. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm Stewart’s sentence. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief Judge. Before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Mark Chambless and Chambless, Math & Carr, P.C., which has been fully briefed. (Docs. # 191, 204, 216.) Upon consideration of the motion, the court concludes that it is due to be granted in part and denied in part. I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

{¶ 45} I respectfully dissent. {¶ 46} Rarely do we, as a court, have a case where the manifest weight of the evidence is in serious debate. This case is the exception. {¶ 47} A.M. was in trouble with her mother and step-father. She had taken the family car without permission and had damaged it. She had also abused her cell phone privileges and run up the bill on it. She decided she wanted to live with her natu

D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge. Appellant Jerry Donald Stewart appeals his sentence pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, claiming that the district court should not have enhanced his sentence by two levels for possession of a weapon during a drug offense. We affirm. I.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 17,1989, a th

234 S.W.3d 315 (2006) Stark LIGON, as Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct v. Jerry Wayne STEWART. No. 06-260. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 27, 2006. PER CURIAM. Petitioner Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, has filed a complaint for disbarment against Respo

OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. In this post-divorce modification suit affecting the parent-child relationship, appellant, Marca Mauldin, appeals the trial court’s final order awarding the paternal grandparents, appellees Jerry and Janet Clements, sole managing conservatorship of her two children, C.T.M. and H.T.M. In five issues, Marca argues that: (1)

255 S.W.3d 435 (2007) Stark LIGON, Executive Director, Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, Appellant, v. Jerry Wayne STEWART, Arkansas Bar # 75125, Appellee. No. 06-260. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 12, 2007. *437 Stuart Vess, North Little Rock, AR, for appellant. Stark Ligon, Executive Director, Supreme C

228 F.Supp.2d 660 (2002) Carol E. STEWART v. Jerry WEAST, et al. No. CIV. JFM-00-2715. United States District Court, D. Maryland. October 28, 2002. *661 *662 Jerry R. Goldstein, Law Offices of Jerry R. Goldstein, Bethesda, MD, for plaintiff. Joann Robertson, Sharon V. Burrell, Joanne Ga

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice, dissenting. This case of first impression is important to the jurisprudence of Texas. It addresses the question of whether a non-Texas resident who uses interactive local websites allegedly to defame a Texas resident is subject to the same jurisdictional standards as a non-Texas resident who uses local print media allegedly to defame a resident. Appellee, RSL Fundin