Cases

657 S.E.2d 719 (2008) Angela D. STEWARD, Plaintiff, v. Merle C. GREEN, in her official capacity as Director of the Guilford County Department of Public Health, The Board of the Guilford County Department of Public Health, Guilford County, Thomas H. Wright, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of State Personnel and the State Personnel Commission, Defendants. No. COA07-762. Court of Appeal

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Levie Steward appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition, in which he alleges ineffective assistance of trial, appellate and post-conviction counsel; invalidity of his guilty plea; cruel and unusual punishment; and judicial misconduct. From our review of the record, it appears that Steward may have had a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 7, 2013 CHRISTOPHER SCOTT CHAPMAN v. HENRY STEWARD, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County No. 12-CR-9762 R. Lee Moore, Jr., Judge No. W2012-02459-CCA-R3-HC - Filed July 17, 2013 Petitioner, Christopher Scott Chapman, pled guilty to aggravated assault in Davidson Cou

ORDER Jerry M. Smith-El, a pro se Michigan prisoner, appeals the district court order granting summary judgment to the defen*716dants in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is

Ray Thornton, Justice. The issue in this case is whether a landlord owes a duty of care to his tenant’s employees. Appellants William T. Steward and Jeannine G. Steward (“Landlords”) leased a building to appellee Professional Services Industries, Inc. (PSI). PSI employed appellee Jerry Eugene McDonald, who was injured when a riser broke while he was carrying boxes weighing approximately 120 pounds up a fli

Richard B. Steward, Jr. and wife, as purchasers, entered into a contract for the sale of real estate with Pauline R. Jones and husband, as sellers, covering a tract of land in Bowie County, Texas, thought to contain 14 acres. When Mr. and Mrs. Jones discovered that the tract actually contained 20.76 acres they refused to convey the property, whereupon the Stewards filed suit to specifically enforce the contract. The Joneses defended on the ground that the contract was unenforceable an

ORDER DENYING PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ORDER CERTIFYING APPEAL NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL JON P. McCALLA, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner Ronald Donnell Moore, Tenne

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY JAMGOTCHIAN; THETA No. 23-55735 HOLDING I, INC., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:22-cv-01893- FWS-KES v. GREGORY L. FERRARO; OSCAR OPINION GONZALES; DENNIS ALFIERI; DAMASCUS CASTELLANOS; BRENDA DAVIS; THOMAS C. HUDNUT; WENDY MITCHELL; KIMBERLY SAWYER; LUIS JA

5 A.3d 638 (2010) Benjamin F. STEWARD, Appellant, v. Marc S. MOSKOWITZ, et al., Appellees. Nos. 08-CV-1055, 08-CV-1064, 08-CV-1392. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 12, 2010. Decided October 7, 2010. *639 Michael Brand, with whom Kenneth J. Loewinger, Washington, DC, and Patricia Millerioux w

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00444-CV Jerry WANZER, Appellant v. Jerry SANCHEZ, Pamela Wagner, Debra Lynn Gloor, Peggy Lea Gohlke, Placido Samaniego, Thomas Hinkle, and James Huwe, Appellees From the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐1702 JERRY L. LEWIS, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Veterans Affairs,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐1702 JERRY L. LEWIS, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Veterans Affairs,

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Feb 16 2016, 6:43 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Jerry T. Drook Gregory F. Zoeller Marion, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 19, 2016 Session NATALIE ROWLAND STEWART v. BRIAN STACY ROWLAND Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00238102 Jerry Stokes, Judge ________________________________ No. W2015-02147-COA-R3-CV – Filed June 2, 2016 ____________________

364 F.Supp. 283 (1973) Mahlon STEWARD v. J. D. HENDERSON, Warden, and J. F. Alderete, Chief Medical Officer, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia. Patrick J. O'SHEA, Minister of Information, Jerry Mack Dorrough, Prime Minister; Individually and on behalf of members of the Church of the New Song; and all other inmates of the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary v. J. D. HENDERSON, Warden, and J. A. Alderete, Chief Medical Officer; and

OPINION — AG — ** PUBLIC TRUSTS — CONFLICT OF INTEREST — CONSTITUTIONALITY ** (1) ARTICLE X, SECTION 11 IS SELF EXECUTING. (2) A PUBLIC TRUST, ORGANIZED UNDER 60 O.S. 176 [60-176], FOR FURTHERANCE OF PUBLIC FUNCTIONS, I.E., A "PUBLIC TRUST" IS AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. (3) THE TRUSTEES OF SUCH A PUBLIC TRUST ARE PUBLIC OFFICERS OF AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. (4) FUNDS RAISED BY OR THROUGH SUCH A PUBLIC TRUST ARE SUBJ

OPINION — AG — THE PROCEDURE EMPLOYED BY THE PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD WHEREBY MEMBERS ARE ALLOWED TO CAST THEIR VOTES BY MAIL IS A PROCEDURE WHICH CONTRAVENES THE OPEN MEETING ACT. CITE: 25 O.S. 1977 Supp., 301 [25-301], 25 O.S. 1977 Supp., 302 [25-302], 25 O.S. 1977 Supp., 306 [25-306], 25 O.S. 1977 Supp., 313 [25-313], 57 O.S. 1975 Supp., 332

This will acknowledge receipt of your request for an official opinion of the Attorney General, wherein you submit the following question: ". . . whether Section 60 O.S. 178.8 [60-178.8] of Title 60 is unconstitutional as it relates to Section 11 of Article 10 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma?" 60 O.S. 178.8 [60-178.8] (1979) provides: "178.8.

OPINION SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge. I. Overview We are asked to decide whether the City of Santa Monica’s refusal to permit a candidate for the City Council to designate his occupation as “peace activist” on the city election ballot violates the candidate’s rights of free speech and equal protection. Because the ballot regulatio

The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in essence, the following question: ' Does the practice followed by the Pardon and Parole Board of voting by mail on whether to recommend clemency for a prison inmate violate the Open Meeting Act? The Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 301 [25-301] et seq. (1977), contains a declaration of public policy. That declaration, in 25 O.S. 302 [25-302], provid