⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Jerry J. Crosley”

District Court, D. Delaware · 2019-02-25 · Published · cited 1× · 369 F. Supp. 3d 590
Goldberg, District Judge. Currently before me in this patent infringement action is a motion challenging venue in this district. Plaintiff, Genuine Enabling Technology, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, brought this action in this district, asserting patent infringement claims against two defendants-Nintendo Co., Ltd, a Japanese company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Nintendo of America, Inc., which is incorporated in th
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011-03-28 · Published · cited 31× · 774 F. Supp. 2d 684; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32374; 2011 WL 1206197
774 F.Supp.2d 684 (2011) Kelli CATANESE, Ross Corriette and James Waldron, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNILEVER d/b/a/ Breyers, Defendant. Civ. No. 10-5755 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 28, 2011. *685 Kelly Ann Noto, Mark C. Gardy, Gardy & Notis LLP,
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989-04-05 · Published · cited 62× · 769 S.W.2d 554; 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 65; 1989 WL 30518
CLINTON, Judge, concurring. Agreeing with the ultimate decision of the Court, I write to explicate my reasons for concurring in its grant of relief. In his application for writ of habeas corpus filed August 21,1987, applicant alleged that he “is illegally restrained of his liberty by virtue of his conviction ... on January 14,1987, of the felony offense of theft over $750.00, in Cause
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-10-10 · Published · cited 1857× · 545 F.3d 304; 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1501; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21377; 2008 WL 4531718
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and JERRY E. SMITH, RHESA H. BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, OWEN, JENNIFER W. ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges: The overarching question before the en banc Court is whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the transfer of this case from the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas — which has no connection to th
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 506 F.3d 376
545 F.3d 304 (2008) In re: VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey Corporation; Volkswagen AG, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Germany, Petitioners. No. 07-40058. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 10, 2008. *306 Danny S. Ashby (argued), Robert H. Mow, Jr., Christopher Donald Kratovil, K & L Ga
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2002 Ohio 3343
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979-11-20 · Published · cited 11× · 397 N.E.2d 615; 72 Ind. Dec. 531; 1979 Ind. App. LEXIS 1429
397 N.E.2d 615 (1979) CITY OF ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana On Relation of Robert Lee Page, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 2-677A232. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. November 20, 1979. *616 James E. Freeman, Deputy City Atty., Anderson, for defendant-appellant. Henry P. Schrenker, Anderson, Dani
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975-10-10 · Published · cited 125× · 525 F.2d 620; 173 U.S. App. D.C. 403; 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1301; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12423
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge: Appellants, 1 plaintiffs in an action pending against appellees 2 in the District Court for the District of Columbia, moved therein for a preliminary injunction restraining appellees from prosecuting in the District Cou
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970-07-06 · Published · cited 382× · 429 F.2d 1197; 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 665; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8317; 1970 Trade Cas. (CCH) 73,263
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: This heated controversy, which at this early stage has already produced four and a half printed pages of docket entries in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, not to speak of those in a related action in the District Court for New Jersey, is between defendant Ford Motor Company and plaintiff Semmes Motors, Inc.,
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK