Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY JAMGOTCHIAN; THETA No. 23-55735 HOLDING I, INC., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:22-cv-01893- FWS-KES v. GREGORY L. FERRARO; OSCAR OPINION GONZALES; DENNIS ALFIERI; DAMASCUS CASTELLANOS; BRENDA DAVIS; THOMAS C. HUDNUT; WENDY MITCHELL; KIMBERLY SAWYER; LUIS JA

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jerry A. Frazier appeals from his conviction and sentence for Theft by Deception in an amount equaling or exceeding $500. Frazier's *Page 2 assigned appellate counsel has filed a brief under the authorityof Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, reflecting his inability to find any potential assig

834 F.Supp. 1305 (1993) PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. W. David KIMBRELL and Janet Kimbrell, Defendants. No. 90-1326-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 8, 1993. *1306 *1307 William A. Bonwell, Jr., Susan Ellis, Bonwell, Foster, Borniger & Ellis; W

834 F.Supp. 1289 (1993) PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. W. David KIMBRELL and Janet Kimbrell, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-1326-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 8, 1993. *1290 *1291 *1292 William A. Bonwell, Jr., Su

[Cite as State v. Curbow, 2013-Ohio-3378.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 25516 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 12-CR-444/1

538 F.3d 272 (2008) David CHIN; Kevin L. Sullivan; Marvin Kirschenbaum; Bruce McCutcheon; Debra Dodge; Kevin L. Dodge; Howard Barkan; Bessie Coyne; George Higgins; Julie Szabos; Jim Coffey; Claude Meyer; Susan Robins; Al Zeidler; Fran Strykowski; Jeff Bradley; Jerry Green; Tony Sanchez; Kenneth E. Nealy; Craig M. Dinsmore; David *273 P. Yexley; Ed Mikoloajczyk; Martha Singleton; Calvin M. Singleton; Howard G. Saul; Sc

OPINION DROWOTA, Justice. The Defendant, Heck Van Tran, appeals his convictions of felony murder in the deaths of Kai Yin Chuey, Amy Lee and Arthur Lee and the sentences of death imposed in each case by the jury. On appeal he challenges, inter alia, the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him, the failure of the trial court to suppress certain statements, the use of a relative to act as an

ACCEPTED 12-15-00005CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 10:02:33 AM

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Lonnie James Jones (Lonnie Jones), Ralph Lee Vaughn, and Gary Donald Jones (Gary Jones) appeal from their convictions. All three defendants were convicted of conspiring to make unregistered destructive devices and maliciously damaging and destroying property in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 371.

Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-7-2008 Chin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp Precedential or No

820 F.Supp. 1519 (1993) ABRAMS & WOFSY, et al. v. RENAISSANCE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al. Kathy J. PIGNATELLI, et al. v. RENAISSANCE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al. Fred A. ACHECAR, et al. v. RENAISSANCE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al. Edmund S. PENDLETON, et al. v. RENAISSANCE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al. Civ. Nos. 1:87-cv-1931-WCO, 1:87-cv-1962-WCO, 1:87-cv-2074-WCO and 1:87-cv-24

312 F.3d 1148 Robert CUNNINGHAM; Armand Soly, Betty Soly, in their individual capacities and as successors in interest to their deceased son, Daniel Soly, and in their capacities as representatives of the classes described fully hereinbelow; Alpha Doe, Beta Doe, in their capacity as a representative of the class described fully hereinbelow; Alfredo Olivas, Harold Bridges, B.K.Williams, in their individual capacities and in their capacities as r

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 11, 2001 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD EUGENE RICKMAN AND WILLIAM EDWARD GROSECLOSE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. B-59341 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge No. W1999-01744-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 17, 2002 The appellants, Ronald Eugene

235 Kan. 143 (1984) 679 P.2d 712 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HARRY L. KREIE, DECEASED. No. 55,670 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed March 24, 1984. Jack E. Dalton, of Mangan, Dalton, Trenkle & Rebein, Chartered, of Dodge City, argued the cause, and Michael A. Doll, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for appellants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS JAMES I. COHN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants City of Miramar, George Pier-son (“Pierson”), William Mantesta (“Mantesta”), and William Guess’ (“Guess”) (collectively “City Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE 38] (“City Motion”) and Defendants Broward County Sheriffs Offi

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. This case arose from the bloody aftermath of a robbery in the Newbury Park neighborhood of Los Angeles. After police surrounded the getaway car, the two robbers, Robert Cunningham and Daniel Soly, exchanged gunfire with the police. Soly died and Cunningham was seriously injured. Cunningham was later tried and convicted of, among other things, murdering Soly by provoking the police to shoot. Soly’s p

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Factual Background 1. The Incident Between Alvarez and Officer Arias at the Jail On November 27, 2005, Alvarez, a then-seventeen year old ninth grade special education

307 S.C. 299 (1992) 414 S.E.2d 795 SHIPYARD PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, Appellant-Respondent v. Stephen MANGIARACINA, William F. Llewellyn, Duncan A. MacLeod, MARILYN A. MacLeod, Justus A. Emens, Lee L. Lachiver, William Ohlson, Henry H. Johnson, Ronald Seamon, Nancy Seamon, Richard C. Chase, Frank Bocuzzi, Mary Bocuzzi, David O. Hoagland, Confidential Escrow & Title, a South Carolina Corporation, Fred Dickerman, Ing

*198MEMORANDUM and ORDER ELFVIN, District Judge. In this action arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., alleging inter alia a violation of the terms of an employee welfare benefit plan,1 a hearing for the presentation of evidence pertinent to the

Cureton, Judge: In this declaratory judgment action, Shipyard Property Owners’ Association (Shipyard) seeks a judicial declaration granting it authority to alter the assessment provisions in the covenants and restrictions for certain property owners in Shipyard Plantation, a planned unit development (PUD). The master concluded Shipyard could not alter the assessment provisions and Shipyard appeals. We affirm.