Cases

*1077OPALA, J., with whom LAVENDER, J., joins dissenting to denial of rehearing. ¶ 1 The court rewards today an employer who belatedly tendered a facially deficient medical report by rejecting the claimant’s timely probative-value objection for the failure of that in-court challenge to meet a new standard of specificity — one tougher than that

562 P.2d 913 (1977) Sam J. AGEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-76-577. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. April 6, 1977. Lewis B. Ambler, Bartleville, for appellant. Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Robert L. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jerry Earl Benson, Legal Intern, for appellee. OPINION BRETT, Judge:

SHARP, W., J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. In my view, Craig has not been afforded a full and complete 3.850 hearing as was contemplated and directed by the Florida Supreme Court.1 An evidentiary hearing is required where the record does not conclusively demonstrate that the movant is not entitled to relief. See, e.g., Lightbourne v. State, 471 So.2d 27 (Fla.198

140 Nev., Advance Opinion LIAO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RUSSELL NEVINS, M.D.; R. NEVINS, No. 85193 M.D., LTD., A NEVADA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; AND NEVADA ORTHOPEDIC & SPINE CENTER, LLP, A NEVADA LIMITED FILED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP, Appellants,

135 Nev., Advance Opinion 561 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JACKY ROSEN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 73274 ROSEN FOR NEVADA, A 527 ORGANIZATION, Appellants, FILE vs. DANNY TARKANIAN, DEC 1 2 2019 Respond

[Cite as State v. Hicks, 2012-Ohio-3831.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 11CA933 : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : DECISION AND v.

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

981 S.W.2d 325 (1998) Vance R. McCAUGHTRY and Houston Lighting & Power Company, Appellants, v. BARWOOD HOMES ASSOCIATION, Appellee. No. 14-96-01546-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). July 30, 1998. Rehearing Overruled September 24, 1998. *327 Jane Bland, Travis James Sales, Jerry W. Gunn, Pa

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2013 No. 09-40400 Lyle W. Cayce

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 14, 2013 Session DEAN MOORE, ET AL. v. PAUL BROCK, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bledsoe County No. 2447 Jeffrey F. Stewart, Chancellor No. E2012-02247-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JUNE 21, 2013 Dean Moore, Trustee for the Dean Henry Moore Living Trust (“Plaintiff”

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Through more than seven years of litigation, Max Moussazadeh has sought kosher meals while confined at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”). The district court, on motion for summary judgment, dismissed Mous-sazadeh’s claim on two independent grounds: failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) and lack of sincerity of religious

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si

55 F.3d 399 Pens. Plan Guide P 23910QG. Bruce WILSON; Marco L. Gilliam; William H. Jones;Robert E. McVey; Jerry Mooneyham; Edwin R. Acheson; J.Marlene Adams; Betty E. Aldridge; Barbara Alexander; JoAnn Altschul; Virginia S. Amyx; Brenda J. Andrews; SandraK. Anglin; Islo D. Ashmore; Jerry L. Atwood; James D.Bailey; Jimmie F. Bailey; Margaret A. Bailey; Patsy R.Bailey; Jerry F. Baker; John C. Baker; Kat

Opinion MANELLA, J. In real party in interest Alan D. Liker’s action to recover his fees under his service contracts with petitioners, the trial court denied petitioners’ motion for summary adjudication. Petitioners seek a writ directing the trial court to vacate the denial of summary adjudication and to enter a new order granting the motion. We grant the petition for writ of mandate. FACTUAL

545 F.3d 943 (2008) In re Bernard L. BILSKI and Rand A. Warsaw. No. 2007-1130. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 30, 2008. *946 David C. Hanson, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, PA, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Richard L. Byrne and Nathan J. Prepelka. Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicito

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. This case stems from debtor Charles Siller’s failure to pay his attorneys following their success in securing the dissolution of a family farming company and recovery of a judgment valued at $30.5 million in cash and real property. The pending motions for reconsideration and the appeals arise from the bankruptcy court’s resolution of Spiller McProud’s claim for p

433 So.2d 508 (1983) Joseph Robert SPAZIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 50250. Supreme Court of Florida. May 26, 1983. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1983. *509 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Craig S. Barnard, Chief Asst. Public Defender and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth

Opinion KLINE, P. J. INTRODUCTION “The relation between attorney and client is a fiduciary relation of the very highest character, and binds the attorney to most conscientious fidelity— *1141uberrima fides.” (Cox v. Delmas (1893) 99 Cal. 104, 123 [33 P. 836]; accord, Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Gold

Ruiz, Senior Judge: These appeals present us with legal issues of first impression concerning the special motion to dismiss created by the District of Columbia’s Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Anti-SLAPP) Act, D.C. Code §§ 16-5501 to - 5505 (2012 Repl.): whether denial of a special motion to dismiss is immediately appealable and the standard applicable in