⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Jerry E. Rhinehart and Betty L. Rhinehart”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 458 So. 2d 967; 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9743
SCHOTT, Judge. We granted certiorari in order to consider the validity of a ruling of the trial court which denied relators’ motion for a protective order prohibiting the dissemination of certain discovery materials. The threshold issue is whether freedom of expression as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution confers any right on respondent and an intervening newspaper publisher (hereinafter s
Riss v. Angelpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996-02-13 · Published · cited 12× · 912 P.2d 1028
912 P.2d 1028 (1996) 80 Wash.App. 553 William J. RISS and Carolyn Riss, husband and wife, Respondents, v. Lee and Margie ANGEL, husband and wife, and their marital community; Defendants, Bruce and Bev Attebery, husband and wife and their marital community; Tim and Leslie Banks, husband and wife, and their marital community; Appellants, Lou and Doris Berg, husband and wife, and their marital community; Stanley and J
District Court, D. Maryland · 1989-06-02 · Published · cited 8× · 126 F.R.D. 501; 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2092; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7042; 1989 WL 67037
CATHERINE C. BLAKE, United States Magistrate. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On January 27, 1989, the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America (“the union”) filed several charges with the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) alleging that Cox Creek Refining Company (“the company”) had engaged in, and was continuing to engage in, unfair labor practices within the meaning of the National Labor Rela