Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jeremy Scott Noe”
Adame, Noe, Relatorspublic domain
WR-83,402-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/5/2015 10:12:42 AM Accepted 6/8/2015 8:14:11 AM ABEL ACOSTA No
Weems v. KEHE FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.public domain
804 F.Supp.2d 339 (2011) Steven WEEMS v. KEHE FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC., d/b/a Kehe Distributors, LLC. Civil Action No. 10-4432. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 7, 2011. *340 Joanne Rathgeber, Hill Wallack LLP, Yardley, PA, for Steven Weems. Schaun D. Henry, McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, Harrisburg,
Hatmaker v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert Hatmaker (“Plaintiff’) brought this action on May 2, 2012, seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff a period of disability, disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Ac
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
507 F.Supp.2d 883 (2007) TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. eSPEED, INC., eSpeed International, Ltd., Ecco LLC, and Ecco Ware Ltd., Defendants. Trading Technologies International, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Refco Group Ltd., LLC, et al., Defendants. Rosenthal Collins Croup, LLC, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. Trading Technologies International, Inc., Defendant Counterclaimant, Trading Technologies
Cite as 2026 Ark. 70 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 16, 2026 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2026 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2026 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2026. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of
Aldaba v. Marshall Countypublic domain
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. In Aldaba v. Pickens, 777 F.3d 1148 (10th Cir. 2015), this Court affirmed the district court’s denial of summary judgment for three law-enforcement officers seeking qualified immunity. Relying on the facts that the district court applied to deny the summary-judgment motion, we concluded that a jury could find that the three officers had
750 F.Supp.2d 962 (2010) TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESPEED, INC., Espeed International, Ltd., Ecco LLC, and EccoWare, Ltd., Defendants. No. 04 C 5312. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 29, 2010. *965 Paul A. Kafadar, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, Paul H
Aldaba v. Marshall Countypublic domain
McKAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Erma Aldaba brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on behalf of her deceased son, Johnny Manuel Leija, who died after an altercation with Appellants— Officer Brandon Pickens and Deputies James Atnip and Steve Beebe — in the Oklahoma hospital where he was being treated for pneumonia. Plaintiff brought several claims against various defendants, incl
Taurus IP, LLC v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.public domain
SCHALL, Circuit Judge. These appeals come to us from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. There, in two separate actions, Taurus IP, LLC (“Taurus”) sued various defendants, alleging that their external websites infringed independent claim 16, as well as dependent claims 19, 22, 23, and 27, of Taurus’s U.S. Patent No. 6,141,658 (the “'658 patent
Burleson v. Statepublic domain
WALLER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Charles David Burleson II appeals his conviction and sentence for capital murder with the underlying felony of robbery. Finding that the trial court erred in amending Burleson’s indictment to charge him as a violent habitual offender and in denying Burleson’s proffered circumstantial-evidence instruction, we reverse Burle-son’s conviction and sentence and remand this
The City of Lake Jackson v. Ricky Adawaypublic domain
Opinion issued May 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00033-CV ——————————— THE CITY OF LAKE JACKSON AND VELASCO DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellants V. RICKY ADAWAY, ROBERT ADEN, THOMAS ALBERS
Arias v. Herzonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1618 ROBERT ARIAS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NOAH A. HERZON, JUAN INFANTE, TY KURCHARSKI, CHRISTOPHER DAY, ADALBERTO GARCIA, MICHAEL BERNARD, Defendants, Appellees, US GOVERNMENT, US DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants. APPEAL
Accuracy Firearms, LLC v. Pritzkerpublic domain
2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________
Charles David Burleson, II v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-KA-00772-SCT CHARLES DAVID BURLESON, II a/k/a CHARLES BURLESON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/12/2012 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES LAMAR ROBERTS, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JOHN C. HELMERT, JR. VICKI R. SLATER RICHARD D. BOWEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-KA-00341-COA SHERARD EUGENE WARD A/K/A SHERARD E. APPELLANT WARD A/K/A SHERRARD WARD v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/19/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GRADY FRANKLIN TOLLISON III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED LAFAYETTE COUNTY CIR
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
United States v. Vytautas Gecaspublic domain
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Vytautas Gecas, is a Lithuanian national who has lived in the United States as a resident alien for thirty-four years. The United States subpoenaed oral and written testimony from Gecas concerning allegations that he participated in the persecution of persons because of their race, religion, or political opinion during World War II. Such conduct would render Gecas deportable. See 8
ACCEPTED 03-16-00203-CV 13816645 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS