Cases

2022 UT App 92 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS 11500 SPACE CENTER LLC, SPACE CENTER BOULEVARD LAND DEVELOPMENT LP, CULLEN’S LLC, AND BERMUDA DUNES DEVELOPMENT LP, Appellants, v. PRIVATE CAPITAL GROUP INC. AND PCG CREDIT PARTNERS LLC, Appellees. Opinion No. 20200280-CA Filed July 29,

2022 UT App 73 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS AIRSTAR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. KEYSTONE AVIATION LLC AND SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, Appellees. Opinion No. 20190847-CA Filed June 16, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Royal I. Hansen

Opinion DAVIS, Judge: T1 Aruna G. Shah and Ghanshyam B. Shah appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for leave to amend their complaint against Intermountain Healthcare, Inc. (LDS Hospital), Dr. Kelly Myers, Dr. Thomas D. Bauman, Dr. George E. Thomsen, Dr. James Zebrack, and Dr. David S. Feuer (collectively, the Defendants). We affirm.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 572–652 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, as Successor by Merger to Nationstar, Inc., et. al. v. Donna Kemp No. 43, September Term 2020 Mortgages – Assignment. As a general rule, if the person that originates a mortgage loan assigns the mortgage loan to another person, the assignee of the loan has the same rights and obligations under a deed of trust that secures that loan as the originator of the loan. Statutes – Statutory Interpretation – Code Revision – Maryland Usury Law. Code revision bi

Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, as Successor by Merger to Nationstar, Inc., et. al. v. Donna Kemp No. 43, September Term 2020 Mortgages – Assignment. As a general rule, if the person that originates a mortgage loan assigns the mortgage loan to another person, the assignee of the loan has the same rights and obligations under a deed of trust that secures that loan as the originator of the loan. Statutes – Statutory Interpretation – Code Revision – Maryland Usury Law. Code revision bi

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 166–235 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 8, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter. 2015 UT 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ——————— RACHEL GRAVES and DUSTIN RUSSELL, a married couple, individually and as Conservators for and on behalf of A.R., a minor child, Appellees,

AMUNDSON, Justice. Bosse Oil Company (Bosse) appeals the trial court’s decision to grant partial summary judgment to Quam <⅞ Berglin, C.P.A. We reverse and remand for trial. FACTS Judith Quam and Dwight Berglin are certified public accountants (Accountants) who operate offices in Elk Point and Aleester, South Dakota. Martin (Martin) and Virgene Bosse are sole owners of a retail automobile

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter. 2015 UT 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ——————— RACHEL GRAVES and DUSTIN RUSSELL, a married couple, individually and as Conservators for and on behalf of A.R., a minor child, Appellees,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of PCAOB Deposition Transcripts and Plaintiffs Notes and Memoranda of Interviews with Non-Party Witnesses, filed November 28, 2012 (Doc. 90) (“Motion to Compel”);2 (ii) Non-Party KPMG L

OPINION AND ORDER HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause are two motions inter alia: (1) Plaintiffs Public Employees’ Retirement System of Ohio (“PERS”), State Teachers’ Retirement System of Ohio (“STRS”), School Employees’ Retirement System of Ohio (“SERS”), and Ohio State Highway Patrol Retirement System’s (“HPRS’s”) (collectively, the “Ohio Retir

*1055 OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge. We consider an action brought by the Wilderness Society and the Alaska Center for the Environment (“Plaintiffs”) challenging a decision by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”), to grant a permit for a sockeye salmon enhanceme

841 S.W.2d 343 (1992) Betty Parr RUSSELL, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Donnon O'Neal Russell, Deceased, et al., Petitioners, v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, et al., Respondents. No. D-0489. Supreme Court of Texas. October 14, 1992. Rehearing Overruled December 9, 1992. Michael Y. Saunders, John W. Tavormina, Carl D. Kulhanek

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APRIL REDDING, legal guardian of  minor child, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 05-15759 SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT #1; KERRY WILSON, husband; JANE  D.C. No. CV-04-00265-NFF DOE WILSON, wife; HELEN ROMERO,

STEINBERG, Associate Judge: The appellant, Mario G. Caluza, appeals a February 25, 1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision denying service connection for residuals of a shell-fragment wound (SFW) to his right leg. The appellant filed an informal brief, and the Secretary filed a brief. For the reasons that follow, the Court affirms the Board decision. I. Background The

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

Justice Thomas, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Scalia join, dissenting. It is ironic that the Court bases today’s decision on the right of the people to “choose whom they please to govern them.” See ante, at 783, 793, 795, 819. Under our Constitution, there is only one State whose people have the right to “choose whom they please” to represent Arkan

ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM