⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jennifer Michaelson”

Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 871 So. 2d 350; 2004 La. LEXIS 1029; 2004 WL 1113368
In re Michaelson, Richard W. et al.; Michaelson, Jennifer A.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. D, No. 2003-7234; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No(s). 2003-C-1874, 2003-C-1888, 2003-C-1921. Denied.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2024-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 543 P.3d 269
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO CANDACE MARIE FLYNN, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER CODY ALLEN FLYNN, Defendant/Appellant. No. 2 CA-CV 2023-0073 Filed January 22, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pinal County
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-05-02 · Published · cited 67× · 185 A.3d 1055
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: Robert E. Robinson appeals from an order dismissing two PCRA petitions as untimely. Appellant alleges that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing with respect to the petition filed June 19, 2015, since the PCRA court analyzed the underlying merits of his substantive claim. While we agree that the PCRA court erred, we affirm on the basis that Appellant failed t
Shah v. Vakharwalapublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 418 P.3d 974
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE In re the Matter of: ARPITA SHAH, Petitioner/Appellee, v. PURVIN VAKHARWALA, Respondent/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 17-0129 FC FILED 1-11-2018 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992-12-22 · Published · cited 22× · 809 F. Supp. 978; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20278; 1992 WL 395608
809 F.Supp. 978 (1992) Amy COHEN, Eileen Rocchio, Nicole A. Turgeon, Karen A. McDonald, Melissa Kuroda, Lisa C. Stern, Jennifer Hsu, Jennifer E. Cloud, Darcy Shearer, Jody Budge, Megan Hull, Kyle Hackett, Each Individually and on Behalf of all Other Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. BROWN UNIVERSITY, Vartan Gregorian, in his Official Capacity as President of Brown University, and David Roach, in his Official Capacity as Athletic Director of Brow
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
Nevada Supreme Court · 2023-07-06 · Published · cited 0×
139 Nev., Advance Opinion l IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE No. 83967 GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF KATHLEEN JUNE JONES, PROTECTED PERSON. FILE KATHLEEN JUNE JONES, Ap
Nevada Supreme Court · 1970-01-26 · Published · cited 0× · 464 P.2d 502; 86 Nev. 49; 1970 Nev. LEXIS 452
464 P.2d 502 (1970) Robert E. GRIFFIN, Special Administrator for the estate of Joseph Vincent Morrone, deceased, and Mary Morrone, individually and as mother and natural guardian of Joseph V. Morrone, Jr., a minor, and Jennifer Lynn Morrone, a minor, Appellants, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 5936. Supreme Court of Nevada. January 26, 1970.
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004-08-12 · Published · cited 15× · 100 P.3d 51
100 P.3d 51 (2004) Clark M. BOLSER, in his capacity as trustee for Eugene Mines, Inc., a dissolved Colorado corporation, and Eugene Mines, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR the COUNTY OF GILPIN, State of Colorado, Anchor Coin, Inc., CCSC/Black Hawk, Inc., Colorado Department of Transportation, and Burton Materials, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 03CA0178. Colorado Court of App
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004-08-12 · Published · cited 1× · 100 P.3d 51; 2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 1426
Opinion by Judge LOEB. In this action to quiet title to property subject to right-of-way easements, plaintiffs, Eugene Mines, Inc. and Clark M. Bolser, as its trustee (together EMI), appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendants, the Board of County Commissioners for Gilpin County; Anchor Coin, Inc.; CCSC/ Black Hawk, Inc.; and the Colorado Department of Transportation. We affirm. The parties proc
Owens v. Tergesonpublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 16× · 363 P.3d 826; 2015 COA 164; 2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 1723; 2015 WL 6746535
Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY T1 In this dispute over mineral rights, defendants Edward H. Tergeson, as trustee of the Harold Furrow Family Trust and as personal representative of the Estate of Esther A. Furrow; AED Group, LLC; and Pegasus Minerals, LLC (collectively, the Furrow Defendants), appeal the district court's order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of Plaint
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 756 N.W.2d 896; 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 666; 2008 Minn. App. LEXIS 368; 2008 WL 4628449
756 N.W.2d 896 (2008) ALEXANDRIA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Relator, v. Judith A. ROST, Respondent, Bureau of Mediation Services, Respondent. No. A07-1620. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. October 21, 2008. *899 Patricia Y. Beety, League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, MN, for relator. Richard T. Wylie, Minneapo
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018-01-30 · Published · cited 5× · 289 F. Supp. 3d 303
Landya McCafferty, United States District Judge Plaintiff HCC Specialty Underwriters, Inc. ("HCC") brings suit against defendant John Woodbury, a former employee of HCC, and defendant Buttine Underwriters Agency, LLC d/b/a Prize and Promotion Insurance Services ("PPI"). PPI is both Woodbury's current employer and a competitor of HCC. HCC's claims arise out of Woodbury's alleged breaches of noncompete and nondisclosure agreements. HC
Cherri v. Muellerpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013-06-11 · Published · cited 2× · 951 F. Supp. 2d 918; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81679; 2013 WL 2558207
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART OFFICIAL-CAPACITY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 32) AVERN COHN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves a challenge to what plaintiffs say is a policy, custom and practice of questioning Muslim-American’s as they enter the United States regarding their religious beliefs and practices in violation of t
New York Supreme Court · 2019-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
In the Matter of the Application of Theodore Papakonstadinou, Holder of a Majority of All Outstanding Shares Entitled to Vote in an Election of Directors, Petitioner, againstFor the Dissolution of Gozzer Corp., a Domestic Corporation, Respondent. 907137-18 Hin
Springer v. Baloughpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000-03-21 · Published · cited 1× · 96 F. Supp. 2d 1250; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9519; 2000 WL 533797
96 F.Supp.2d 1250 (2000) Lindsey K. SPRINGER, Plaintiff, v. Vicki BALOUGH, et al., Defendants. No. 99-CV-0977B(E). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 21, 2000. *1251 *1252 Lindsey K Springer, Tulsa, OK, Pro se. Tracy Folsom Milner, Barbara C Stoner, Office of the Attorne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-08-10 · Published · cited 2× · 459 F.3d 954; 2006 WL 2291168
OPINION SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. I. Overview This is a government appeal from a district court judgment enjoining Forest Service regulations that govern review of deci *958 sions implementing forest plans, on the ground that the regulations were manif
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-08-10 · Published · cited 2× · 490 F.3d 687; 2007 WL 1651422
ORDER The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Chief Judge Schroeder and Judge Graber have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Duffy has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en bane are DENIED.
Lak v. Lakpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2020-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/22/20 Certified for Publication 6/12/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JENNIFER S. LAK, Respondent, G056784 v. (Super. Ct. No. 09D001393) DANIEL K. LAK,
District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-03-03 · Published · cited 18× · 689 F. Supp. 2d 417; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18738; 2010 WL 723685
689 F.Supp.2d 417 (2010) Shawn LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Police Officer Dean Anagnostos, and Sergeant John Marchello, Defendants. No. 06-CV-0516 (RER). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 3, 2010. *420 Roberta D. Asher, Ryan Heath Asher, Asher & Associates, P.C., Leslie D. Kelmachter, The Jacob