Cases

2016 WI 22 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1283 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the marriage of: Nancy M. Meister and Jay E. Meister: S. A. M., A. L. M., O. M. M. and J. E. M., minors, by their guardian ad litem, Jennifer Weber, Appellan

Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Griggs Road, L.P. and Blaise Alexander ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Selective Way Insurance Company of America ("Selective") filed cross-motions for summary judgment asking this Court to determine whether, under Plaintiffs' all-risk insurance policy, an ensuing loss clause restores coverage to Plaintiffs' claim despite a faulty workmanship exclusion. I conclude that it does,

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: This case returns to us after a limited remand. After our opinion in M.D. by Stukenberg v. Abbott ( Stukenberg I) , 907 F.3d 237 (5th Cir. 2018), the district court was tasked with modifyi

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *243 Plaintiffs, a certified class of minor children in the Permanent Managing Conservatorship of the Department of Family Protective Services ("DFPS") in Texas, filed suit under

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════════ NO. 17-0836 ════════════════ CITY OF DALLAS, MIKE RAWLINGS, SCOTT GRIGGS, ADAM MEDRANO, CASEY THOMAS II, CAROLYN KING ARNOLD, RICKEY D. CALLAHAN, MONICA R. ALONZO, TIFFINNI A. YOUNG, ERIK WILSON, MARK CLAYTON, B. ADAM MCGOUGH, LEE M. KLEINMAN, SANDY GREYSON, JENNIFER S. GATES, PHILIP T. KINGSTON, AND A.C.

*72 DOWNIE, Judge: OPINION ¶ 1 Thomas and Jennifer Griggs appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Oasis Adoption Services, Inc., Catherine Braman, and Sarah L. Pedrazza (collectively, “Oasis”) on the grounds of judicial immunity.

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 20, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01227-CV CITY OF DALLAS, MIKE RAWLINGS, SCOTT GRIGGS, ADAM MEDRANO, CASEY THOMAS II, CAROLYN KING ARNOLD, RICKEY D. CALLAHAN, MONICA R. ALONZO, TIFFINNI A. YOUNG, ERIK WILSON, MARK CLAYTON, B. ADAM MCGOUGH, LEE M. KLEINMAN, SANDY GREYSON,

REL: February 3, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TER

184 Cal.App.4th 539 (2010) 108 Cal.Rptr.3d 846 In re JENNIFER O. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARTIN O., Defendant and Appellant. No. B216672. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. May 6, 2010.

[Cite as State ex rel. Nickolas M. Savko & Sons, Inc. v. Perry Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2014-Ohio-1181.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. : Nickolas M. Savko & Sons, Inc. et al., : Relators, : No. 14AP-

690 S.E.2d 401 (2010) SUMMERLIN et al. v. GEORGIA PINES COMMUNITY SERVICE BOARD. No. S09G0980. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 1, 2010. Conley Griggs, Cale Conley, Atlanta, C. Frederick Overby, Columbus, for appellants. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Kathleen M. Pacious, Deputy Attorney General, Jennifer L. Dalton, Loretta L. Pinkston, Senior Assistant

Kennedy, J., dissenting. {¶ 30} Respectfully, I dissent. How the General Assembly intended a township to exercise its zoning power over privately owned land is at the very heart of this controversy. [TJownships of Ohio have no inherent or constitutionally granted police power, the power upon which zoning legislation is based. Whatever police or zoning power townships of Ohio have is

[Cite as State v. McKnight, 2023-Ohio-1933.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 22CA0027-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE SCOTT R. McKNIGHT

Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Ridge Tool Company's Motion for Costs. (ECF No. 56). Plaintiff Bubba McLelland has responded to the motion. (ECF No. 59). Defendant has replied. (ECF No. 61). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. I. DISCUSSION As the prevailing party in this action,1 Defendant asser

Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge *804Before the Court is Defendant Ridge Tool Company's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert, Mr. Don R. Johnston. (ECF No. 34). Plaintiff Bubba McLelland filed a response. (ECF No. 46). Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 48). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. I. BACKGR

Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Ridge Tool Company's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff Bubba McLelland filed a response. (ECF No. 43). Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 49). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. I. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2014, Plaintiff, a master plumber with thirty years' experience, ar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-IA-01287-SCT PURDUE PHARMA, L. P., PURDUE PHARMA INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY AND WINSTON T. CAPEL, M.D. v. ESTATE OF JOCELYN HEFFNER, JENNIFER BURROUGH AND EDWARD SOFFRA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 6/2/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: STEVE J. ALLEN

MEMORANDUM ** James Claffey and Polly Jones appeal the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Jones argues that the district court erred in determining that she was not a participant or applicant in a Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) program. To the contrary, the district court determined that Jones w

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2017-Ohio-8680.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 17CA0035-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE KEITH M. SMITH

PITTMAN, Judge. C.M.R. (“the mother”), the mother of A.N.R. and A.C.R. (collectively referred to as “the children”), appeals from judgments entered by the Talladega Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) that, among' other things, determined that the children were dependent; awarded L.W., a woman who is not related to the mother or the children, custody of the children; and awarded the mother supervised visitation. We affirm.</