Cases

[Cite as State v. Breneman, 2014-Ohio-4700.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2013-CA-57 v. : T.C. NO. 2013-CR-163 JAMES D. BRENEMAN : (Criminal appeal from

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 19 2018, 9:10 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeal

[Cite as State v. Perrymond, 2014-Ohio-2863.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 13CA0046-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JUAN R. PERRYMOND

ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Donald E. Thornton’s Motion for Sanctions and to Strike the Answer of Defendant Blitz USA, Inc. and to Compel Discovery. Upon due consideration, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Donald E. Thornton filed this lawsuit, alleging that Defendant Blitz USA manufactured, a

COLE, Chief Judge. This matter presents a familiar question in our court: what special penalties are placed on sex offenders for violating the law? Trevon Barcus is a sex offender. After cutting off his ankle bracelet and fleeing to Texas, Barcus pleaded guilty to failing to register as a sex offender as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"). The distr

CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Larry D. Nichols appeals from a corrected sentence entered by the district court in an amended judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . 1 For the reasons that follow, w

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs, Timothy E. Cichocki (“Cichocki”) and his wife, Y. Dolly Hwang (“Hwang”), are former professors at Mas*434sachusetts Bay Community College (“Mass Bay”). They have brought this pro se act

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO STRIKE WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiff Beth A. Rhodes brought this action against Sutter Health, Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (“SGMF”), and The Gould Medical Group, Inc. (“GMG”) alleging unlawful retaliation, constructive discharge, gender harassment, gender discrimination, failure to prevent discrimination, violatio

Karen King Mitchell, Judge Samvel Topchian appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, granting summary judgment to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase), Martin, Leigh, Laws & Fritzlen, PC (MLLF), and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) on Topchian's claims of breach of contract (against Chase), violations of the Missouri Merchandizing Practices Act (MMPA) (against Chase, MLLF, and SPS), and common l

991 F.2d 1195 Sharon L. NICHOLS, David R. Nichols, Virginia Ann Callan,Charles Oliver Richardson, III, Marilyn Goodman, Thomas J.Goodman, Debra A. Lopez, Rudolph Lopez, Sharon RuthAnderson, Rosemary Madrid Castaneda, Jesse Castaneda, KarenLeslie-Lloyd, Jacqueline Templin, Katherine Galati Novick,Karen Janet Davis, Peggy Lee Patterson, Michelle James,Patricia Ann Ehlert, Dana Messerly, Raymond Leroy Messerly,Susan Gail Pa

[Cite as State v. Gay, 2013-Ohio-4169.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26487 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE KENNARD S. GAY

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WEIL, No. 16-35813 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-00835-JLR CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, LLC; FRONTIER OPINION COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal

[Cite as State v. Wilson, 2014-Ohio-376.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26683 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE TRAMELL RAYSHAWN WILSON

821 F.Supp. 301 (1993) Harry D. FLOHR and Sharon G. Flohr, in their own right and as guardians of Erin E. Flohr, Jennifer Flohr and Douglas Flohr and Harry Flohr Administrator of the Estate of Dana Marie Flohr, v. PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 91-4216. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 5, 1993.

OPINION DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs in this consolidated appeal are 116 women who filed products liability actions against defendant G.D. Searle & Company (“Searle”) in the District of Maryland from 1987-1991 alleging that they were injured by the Cu-7 intrauterine device manufactured by Searle. The district court granted Searle’s motion to dismiss these actions for lack of personal juri