⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jennifer M Williams”

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-20-00243-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BOBBY MARTIN, § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT WPP PROPERTIES, LLC, JENNIFER M. WILLIAMS, WILLIAM R. PULLEY AND ZACHARY D. PULLEY, APPELLEES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 122 A.D.3d 1328; 996 N.Y.S.2d 201
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered March 29, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, ordered that the parties shall have joint custody of the subject child. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Valentino, Whalen and DeJoseph, J
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 122 A.D.3d 1328; 996 N.Y.S.2d 201
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered March 29, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, ordered that the parties shall have joint custody of the subject child. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Valentino, Whalen and DeJoseph, J
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 113 N.E.3d 1232
Riley, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE [1] Appellant-Respondent, Jennifer L. Rose (Rose), appeals the trial court's Order on Appellee-Plaintiff's, William D. *1233 Bozeman, Sr. (Bozeman), motion to correct error with respect to
In re Jennifer R.public domain
New York City Family Court · 2013-11-25 · Published · cited 1× · 42 Misc. 3d 508; 978 N.Y.S.2d 605
OPINION OF THE COURT Ann E. O’Shea, J. Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) brings this order to show cause asking the court to issue a warrant for either the arrest of the subject child Jennifer R., who will turn 17 years of age in less than two weeks, or the arrest of the respondent mother, Tanya M. (mother), with a direction that she produce Jennifer in court. On March 8, 2013,
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2025-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 28, 2025 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2014-06-19 · Published · cited 21× · 437 S.W.3d 547; 2014 WL 2766666; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6578
OPINION Opinion by Justice CARTER. Jennifer Jill Whitehead was tried and convicted by an Anderson County jury 1 for the capital murder of Emma Whitehead, an individual under the age of six, 2 and for injury to a ch
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-02-14 · Published · cited 5× · 94 N.E.3d 712
Barnes, Judge. Case Summary [1] In this interlocutory appeal, Jennifer Edwards and Abigail Elizabeth Freeman Jacks ("Abigail"), a minor, by next friends, Jennifer Jacks and William Scott Freeman, and Jennifer Jacks (collectively, "Jacks Family"), appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the Tipton Community School Corporation ("Scho
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014-07-31 · Published · cited 44× · 761 F.3d 873; 2014 WL 3747601; 200 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3190; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14634
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Jennifer Parrish and other plaintiffs operate child-care businesses in their homes. They challenge the constitutionality of *875 Minnesota’s Family Child Care Providers Representation Act (the Act). The district court 1
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 240 F. Supp. 3d 173; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29978
*176 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge In this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Ruth Richards alleges that she was arrested by Metropolitan Police Department Officer Jennifer Gelsomino without probable cause and because
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-09-07 · Published · cited 73× · 871 F.3d 572; 2017 WL 3910116; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17273
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Jennifer Heglund and her husband Jamie Heglund sued numerous Minnesota cities and counties, state officials, and hundreds of John and Jane Does, alleging that police officers had improperly accessed their private information in the State’s driver’s license database. The Heglunds later amended their complaint to replace one of the John Does with Frank Sch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-01-03 · Published · cited 58× · 710 F.3d 872; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 92; 2013 WL 28579
ORDER The request to publish the unpublished memorandum disposition is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed December 13, 2012, is redesignated as a per curiam opinion with modifications. OPINION PER CURIAM: Jennifer Lynn Henderson, who is currently serving two consecutive life sentences without the p
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 195 Wash. App. 10; 380 P.3d 565
Lee, J. ¶1 Aiken, St. Louis, and Siljeg, P.S., moved to enforce its attorney’s lien under RCW 60.40.010(1)(d) against Jennifer Linth in her personal capacity, remove Linth as trustee of the Evelyn Plant Trust (Trust), appoint a new trustee, and compel the sale of the Trust’s real property. The superior court denied Aiken’s motion. Aiken appeals the superior court’s order, arguing that
In re Ava M.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. This opinion is subject to revisions and editorial changes, not of a substantive nature, and corrections of a tech
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-11-16 · Published · cited 10× · 18 F.4th 565
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1886 ___________________________ M.B., by next friend Ericka Eggemeyer Plaintiff - Appellee E.S., by next friend A.S.; Z.S., by next friend S.H. Plaintiffs K
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1170 CAF 13-01089 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JACOB K. HAUDENSHILD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V ORDER JENNIFER M. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. ARD
In re Ryder Mpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
In re Ryder Mpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 290 A.3d 103; 2023 ME 17
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 17 Docket: Yor-22-221 Submitted On Briefs: November 17, 2022 Decided: March 2, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, CONNORS, and LAWRENCE, JJ. WILLIAM B. DANIEL v. JENNIFER M. MCCOY CONNORS, J. [¶1] Jennifer M. McCoy appeals from a
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-07-15 · Published · cited 3× · 58 N.E.3d 928; 2016 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 827; 2016 WL 3857066
BAILEY, Judge. Case Summary [1] Brian and Jennifer Boyland (“the Boylands”) and Anthony, Lisa, Sydney, and Lydia Climer (“the Climers”) (collectively, “Homeowners”) brought negligence and inverse condemnation claims against Kenneth Hedge (“Hedge”), in his capacity as Boone County Surveyor, the Boone County Drainage Board, and the Boone County Board of Commi