Cases

FILED Mar 12 2026, 1:26 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE India

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals ¶ 1 The defendant, Richard Norris, challenges the constitutionality of the Communications Fraud statute, Utah Code section 76-10-1801, as overbroad. Specifically, he seeks review of the decision of the court of appeals holding that the statute is constitutional. ¶ 2 The State cross-petitions, seeking reversal of the decision of the court of appeals that an unconditional guilty plea d

97 P.3d 732 (2004) 2004 UT App 267 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Richard NORRIS, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020966-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. August 12, 2004. *735 Jennifer K. Gowans, Fillmore Spencer LLC, Provo, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff, Attorney General, and Jeffrey S. G

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * WILLIAM J. HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Claimant Mary A.

228 B.R. 27 (1998) In re Robert Fred NORRIS, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-04162-BKC-3P3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. December 15, 1998. *28 Andrew J. Decker, III, Live Oak, FL, for debtor. Jennifer S. Ebanks, Clearwater, FL, for U.S.A. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

600 N.W.2d 658 (1999) 236 Mich. App. 411 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Oliver NORRIS, a/k/a Deon Johnson, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 202654. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted January 13, 1999, at Detroit. Decided June 25, 1999, at 9:35 a.m. Released for Publication October 8, 19

198 F.Supp.2d 1070 (2002) Thomas L. NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Thomas J. Lyons, Jr., Consumer Justice Center, P.A., Thomas J. Lyons, Sr., and Thomas J. Lyons & Associates, Third-Party Defendants. No. Civ. 01-SC-754 (PAM/JGL) United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 19, 2002.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2632 ___________________________ Jennifer L.M. LeMay, personally, and as guardian of CLE, VE, minors; Courtney J. Livingston Plaintiffs - Appellees v.

DREW, J. In this matter involving a third-party demand for indemnification, defense, and insurance coverage, International Paper Company ("IP") appeals a summary judgment dismissing its claims against L & R Timber Co., Inc. ("L & R"). We reverse the judgment in part, affirm in part, and remand. BACKGROUND In April of 2011, IP and L & R executed a "Mast

MARTIN, District Judge: In this interlocutory appeal of a retaliatory discharge case, the court is asked to determine whether an employee’s refusal to agree to a compulsory arbitration provision regarding employment discrimination claims constitutes protected activity for the purposes of alleging a prima facie case of retaliation. We find that it does not. We therefore vacate i

Hines, Justice, dissenting. I must respectfully dissent because I believe that the Court of Appeals correctly determined that OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) requires actual receipt of an ante litem notice of claim within 12 months of the date of the loss. The Georgia Tort Claims Act provides that an individual may not bring a tort claim against the state unless the individual first gives the sta

Montgomery Beverage Company, Inc., d/b/a Mobile Beer and Wine Company, petitioned this Court, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., for permission to appeal from the denial of its motion for a partial summary judgment. This Court granted permission to appeal. In light of this Court's opinion in Byrd v. Dillard's, Inc., [Ms. 1021439, April 2, 2004] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala. 2004), the trial court's order denying the motion for a partial summary judgment in this case no longer "

692 S.E.2d 190 (2010) Ricky C. NORRIS and Teresea L. Norris, Plaintiffs, v. Jason Cameron NORRIS, Defendant, v. Elizabeth Midkiff, Intervenor. In the Matter of the Adoption of J.N., a Minor, C.N., a Minor. No. COA09-1329. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 20, 2010. *191 Joyce L. Terres, Greensboro, for plainti

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1552 ___________________________ Trenisha Webster Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jennifer Westlake, Individually and in capacity of a law enforcement officer; Lori Kelly, Indiv

PER CURIAM. Appellant, William Norris, appeals the revocation of his probation in two cases and the resulting imposition of new sentences for his underlying offenses. In both cases, the trial court found that Appellant violated his probation by engaging in the conduct proscribed in section *231562.11(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2009), among other violations. Although t

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-961 _____________________________ JENNIFER ELLIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James C. Hankinson, Judge. September 15, 2021 PER CURIAM. The appellant raises two

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Megan K. Cavanagh Brian K. Zahra

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1248 Filed April 21, 2017 LYLE H. ABBAS, F. DOW BATES, BRADLEY J. BROWN, SIDNEY E. CARTER, BRAD CHICOINE, RUSSELL J. COX, PAUL D. EBERLINE, JOSEPH N. GEELAN, RICHARD W. HAAS, REX J. JONES, KEITH L. KLEMME, ELIZABETH C. KRESSIN, STEVEN J. KRAUS, MARK A. KRUSE, RODNEY D. LANGEL, RONALD O. MASTERS II, KEVIN MILLER, STEVEN A. MUELLER, MARK A. NILES, VALORIE J. PRAHL, JENNIFER A. RASMUSSEN, RO

986 F.2d 134 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roy L. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-1200, 91-1201. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 1, 1992.Decided Feb. 16, 1993. Jennifer Mulhern Granholm (argued and briefed), Office of U.S. Atty., Detroit, MI, for plaintiff-a

LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge | ¶ Jennifer Sehiffer appeals from the sentencing order entered on November 15, 2013, revoking her probation. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule ,4-3(k) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), her attorney has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel, asserting that there