Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jennifer L. Nichols”
Charles Inechien v. Nichols Aluminum, LLCpublic domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Charles Inechien 1 sued his employer, Nichols Auminum, LLC (“Nichols”), for breach of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) and sued his union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union, Local No. 371 (“Union”), for breach of its duty of fair representation. The district cour
Nichols v. Bellpublic domain
440 F.Supp.2d 730 (2006) Harold Wayne NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, Respondent. No. 1:02 CV 330. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. July 25, 2006. *731 *732 *733
Nichols v. Bellpublic domain
440 F.Supp.2d 847 (2006) Harold Wayne NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, Respondent. No. 1:02 CV 330. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. July 25, 2006. *848 *849 Stephen M. Kissinger, Dana C Hansen Chavis, Knoxville, T
Betsy L. Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Muskingum College, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellantpublic domain
OPINION WISEMAN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. Betsy Nichols (“Nichols”) appeals the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of her Title VII employment discrimination claim. The district court found that Nichols failed to timely file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). Defendant
Bierach v. Nicholspublic domain
—Peters, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered April 10, 1997 in Franklin County, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. *917Plaintiff, on behalf of her daughter Jennifer, commenced this action as a result of injuries sustained by Jennifer after she was hit in the
State v. Nicholspublic domain
970 P.2d 79 (1998) 1998 MT 271 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. James Anderson NICHOLS, Defendant and Appellant. No. 98-388. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs October 1, 1998. Decided November 12, 1998. Karl Knuchel, Attorney at Law, Livingston, Montana, for Appellant. Hon. Joseph P. Mazurek,
KELLY v. HARRIS Et Al.public domain
Dillard, Judge. In this civil action arising from an automobile accident, Thomas Kelly appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to GEICO, his insurance carrier. On appeal, Kelly argues that the trial court erred in finding that GEICO was not in default for its untimely answer, that the notice provision of GEICO’s insurance policy was unambiguous, and that he failed to c
Donald Allen v. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.Cpublic domain
JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent because the district court and the majority of this court have departed from controlling Supreme Court and circuit precedent and have misinterpreted and misapplied Department of Labor (“DOL”) regulation 29 C.F.R. § 782.2(a) and this court’s decision in Songer v. Dillon Resources, Inc., 618 F.3d 467 (5th Cir.2010), to except more than a h
Mucyo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.public domain
JOHNSON, Presiding Judge. Chantal Mucyo filed a complaint against Publix Super Markets, Inc. in which she alleged that Publix’s negligence resulted in injuries she sustained when she fell inside one of its stores. Mucyo appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Publix, alleging that Publix had constructive knowledge of the foreign substance on its floor that caused her to fall. For the reasons set forth
Myers v. Highway 46 Holdings, L.L.C.public domain
MONACO, C.J. Mr. Webster defines “prolix” as being “unduly prolonged or drawn out” or “given to verbosity and diffuseness in speaking or writing,” and “prolixity” as “the quality or state of being prolix.” Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary 681 (1969). If one would truly seek to understand prolixity, however, one would want to review the second amended counterclaim and cross-claim filed by the appellants, M
DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT By order dated March 17, 2006, the above-captioned matter has been referred to the undersigned for the supervision of pretrial discovery and the hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(A) and (B). (Docket # 11). Plaintiff, the Eq
Velva L. Price Travis County District Clerk Travis County Courthouse Complex P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767-9003 December 22, 2015 Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court of Appeals P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547 RE: 03-15-00704-CV; D-1-GN-14-001701 Dear Mr. Kyle, A clerk’s record in cause number, D-1-GN-14-001701 and Court of Appeals number 03-15-00704-CV, styled, CHAMPION PRINTING V NICHOLS PHOTOGRAPHERS, is due in your office De
United States v. Nicholspublic domain
PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Terry Lynn Nichols appeals his conviction and sentence after having been found guilty of conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction, 18 U.S.C. § 2332a, and eight counts of involuntary manslaughter, §§ 1114, 1112. The jury acquitted him on counts of using a weapon of mass destruction, § 2332a, destruction by explosives, § 844(f), and eight counts ea
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA JULIE I. HUSBY and GREGORY L. ) HUSBY, ) Supreme Court No. S-18023
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Collegium Pharm., Inc.public domain
F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge This is a patent dispute concerning a pharmaceutical product: abuse-deterrent, extended-release oxycodone. Plaintiffs Purdue Pharma L.P.; The P.F. Laboratories, Inc.; Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.; and Rhodes Technologies (collectively, "Purdue") have brought suit against Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. The amended complaint asserts claims for infringement of three related patents pursu
Nichols v. Nicholspublic domain
Nebraska Advance Sheets NICHOLS v. NICHOLS 339 Cite as 288 Neb. 339 Bonnie Nichols, appellant, v. Margie Nichols, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 13, 2014. No. S-13-841. 1. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. The question of jurisdiction is a question of law, which an appellate c
Nikola Jajic v. Jennifer Sainatopublic domain
RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2025; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2023-CA-0956-MR NIKOLA JAJIC APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE MITCHELL PERRY, JUDGE ACTION NO. 18-CI-007456 JENNIFER SAINATO; MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.; RLJ LODGING TRUST; AND WHITE LODGING SER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., § § No. 330, 2016 Plaintiff Below- § Appellant, § Court Below: - Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. Nos. 12168 & 12337 ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY, L.P., § et al., §
Ryan Carroll v. Jennifer C. Bursteinpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RYAN CARROLL, on behalf of himself 1 and all similarly situated stockholders of STOKE THERAPEUTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2024-0317-LWW JENNIFER C. BURSTEIN, SETH L. HARRISON, EDWARD M. KAYE, ADRIAN KRAINER, ARTHUR A. LEVIN, GARRY E. MENZEL, JULIE ANNE SMITH, IAN F. SMITH, ARTHUR TZIANABOS, and STOKE THERAPEUTICS, INC., Defendants.
Anthea Hendrix Toutges v. Jennifer McKaigpublic domain
06/25/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 23, 2020 ANTHEA HENDRIX TOUTGES v. JENNIFER MCKAIG Appeal from the Chancery Court for Anderson County No. 01CH1436 M. Nichole Cantrell, Chancellor ___________________________________