Cases

ARONSON, J. Petitioner Stephen Bennett is currently serving an indeterminate sentence of life without the possibility of parole following his conviction for first degree special circumstance murder while aiding and abetting a robbery. ( Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A) ; all undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) On direct appeal in 2010 we rejected his sufficiency of the evidence claim, and affirmed his convi

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). DAVIS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Bruns, J.: *527 *615 This is a derivative action filed in Johnson County District Court by Monica Ross-Williams on behalf of the Sprint Nextel Corporation. The action arises out of the 2005 mer

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0272p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ DAN BENNETT; KAREN BENNETT, ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, │

*168SCHROEDER, Chief Justice. Joshua W. Bennett, Clinton L. Marsters, and Jennifer L. Ouellette (collectively, “appellants”) were cited for violating I.C. § 23-604, which prohibits individuals under twenty-one years of age from purchasing, consuming, or possessing alcoholic beverages. They are all under twenty-one but eight

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge THACKER and Judge URBANSKI joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: In Tapia v. United States, the Supreme Court held that the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 does not permit federal courts to consider a defendant’s rehabilitative

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...................................1169 A. Procedural Background.............................................1169 B. Factual Background..................................

This Court granted State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") permission to appeal from the denial of its motion to dismiss in an action for uninsured-motorist benefits filed against State Farm by several of its insureds, including Jennifer Bennett. See Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P. We affirm. In March 2003, Bennett and the other insureds (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Bennett") were involved in a motor-vehicle accident allegedly caused by the negligence

777 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2011) Jennifer Leigh HOLT, Individually and as Parent of J.S.H., a minor, Plaintiff, v. QUALITY EGG, L.L.C., d/b/a "Wright County Egg," an Iowa limited liability company, Defendant. Daniel and Libby Sands, Individually and as Parents of A.S., a minor, Plaintiffs, v. Quality Egg, L.L.C., d/b/a "Wright County Egg," an Iowa limited liability company, Defendant. Sarah Lewis, Plaintiff, v. Quality Egg, L.L.C

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. The Plaintiff Ireneusz Ziemkiewicz asserts claims against his former employer Defendant R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLC, and the Defendant R + L Carriers, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) for defamation, unlawful interference with contract, and unlawful interference with prospective economic benefit, based on allegations that the Defe

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-003648-13 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

616 N.W.2d 703 (2000) 241 Mich. App. 511 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph H. BENNETT, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 208778. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted December 14, 1999, at Detroit. Decided June 23, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication September 6, 2000. <

07/28/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2017 Session JENNIFER L. AL-ATHARI, ET AL. v. LUIS A. GAMBOA, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 13C5327 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge _

ORDER Armando Vargas-Torres, a 31-year-old Mexican citizen, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s decision ordering his removal and denying his request for a continuance. Before the Board, Vargas-Torres sought relief from his prior counsel’s ineffective assistance in failing to apply for cancellation of removal. But Vargas-Torres did not follow the required procedural steps

PER curiam; ■ James Acquaah is a sixty-three-year-old man from Ghana. He originally entered the United States on a visitor’s visa and later obtained conditional permanent resident status based on his marriage to a United States citizen. His application to remove the conditions on his residency sparked proceedings that have spanned more than twenty-five years. While those proceedings awaited a -decis

POSNER, Chief Judge. The plaintiff, who worked as a teller for the defendant bank between April 1994 and February 1996, brought suit against the bank and related entities unnecessary to discuss charging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq., the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k), and the Fair Labor Standard

MANION, Circuit Judge. Jose Miguel Palma-Martinez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order of removal. Because the IJ neither erred in holding that Palma-Martinez was ineligible for a waiver nor abused his discretion in denying Palma-Martinez a continuance, we deny the petition.

WOOD, Chief Judge. Petitioner Alvaro Adame was placed in removal proceedings in 2009. He applied for cancellation of removal, but an immigration judge (IJ) rejected his application in 2011 and ordered him removed. The Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirmed. Adame now petitions for review of the Board’s decision, asserting that we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2

OPINION SLIGHTS, J. I. In this opinion, the Court considers a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants, Frederick L. Barnes, III, Sean A. Keblen, Jennifer Grasso, Susan Schmidt, Division of Youth Rehabilitative Services (“DYRS”) and Division of Prevention and Behavioral Health Services (“DPBHS”) (collectively “Defendants”) in which the Defendants allege that Plaintiffs claims are barred b

PER CURIAM. In our opinion of July 24, 2000, affirming the district court’s decision, we ordered the plaintiff-appellant’s counsel, Ernest T. Rossiello, to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for having taken a frivolous appeal (Fed. R.App. P. 38) from the district court’s order cutting down the attorneys’ fees that he had requested. Mr. Ros-siello has submitted his respons