Cases

74 Cal.Rptr.2d 878 (1998) 18 Cal.4th 253 955 P.2d 504 Timothy TOLAND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUNLAND HOUSING GROUP, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. S050870. Supreme Court of California. June 1, 1998. *879 Hefner, Stark & Mares, Robert P. Biller and Stephen S. Tilt, Sacr

PER CURIAM. The appellant appeals the judgment and sentence imposed after the trial court found that he violated probation. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse. The affidavit of violation of probation alleged that appellant violated probation by committing the criminal offense of “LSOA without giving info more than $50 damage.” 1 However, there was no evidence of any d

926 A.2d 926 (2007) RIVERWALK CASINO, L.P., Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners, L.P., Intervenor. HSP Gaming, L.P., Intervenor. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 15, 2007. Decided July 17, 2007. *928 Arthur Michael Brown, Esq., Levine,

ORDER on PENDING MOTIONS — No. 2 R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. This order addresses six pending motions. Facts Briefly, plaintiffs allege that defendant Sandy Hutchens was the mastermind of a loan fraud scheme designed to extract mo*972nies from victims in the United States. The other defendants are

OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. Plaintiff USfalcon, Inc. brings a post-award bid protest challenging a procurement decision of the United States Army Communications-Eleetronies Life Cycle Management Command (“CECOM” or “agency”). The agency excluded USfalcon from the competitive range in a negotiated procurement to award multiple Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) contracts, under w

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 11 2019, 8:42 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

862 F.Supp. 309 (1994) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Ernest M. FLEISCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 93-2062-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 15, 1994. *310 H. David Barr, Charles J. Williams, Gage & Tucker, Overland Park, KS, William L. Turner, Bernard J. Rhodes, R. Kent Sellers, Jeffrey M. Pfa

824 F.Supp.2d 1193 (2011) CGC HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; Crescent Sound Yacht Club, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Harlem Algonquin LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; and James T. Medick; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Tanya HUTCHENS; Jennifer Hutchens, a/k/a Jennifer Araujo; Canadian Funding Corporation; an Ontario corporation; 308 Elgin Street Inc.,

PITMAN, J. LA nonunanimous jury convicted Defendant Andre Demery- as charged of aggravated rape. The trial court sentenced him to the mandatory term of life imprisonment. Defendant appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to convict him. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s conviction and sentence. FACTS On January 28, 2013, the state filed a bill of i

890 F.Supp. 972 (1995) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Ernest M. FLEISCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 93-2062-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 6, 1995. *973 H. David Barr, Charles J. Williams, Gage & Tucker, Overland Park, KS, William L. Turner, Bernard J. Rhodes, R. Kent Sellers, Jeffrey M. Pfaff,

848 F.Supp. 917 (1994) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Ernest M. FLEISCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 93-2062-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 4, 1994. *918 H. David Barr, Andrea J. Goetze, Gage & Tucker, Overland Park, KS, William L. Turner, Bernard J. Rhodes, R. Kent Sellers, Charles J. Williams

871 F.Supp. 1362 (1994) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Ernest M. FLEISCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 93-2062-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 1, 1994. *1363 H. David Barr, Charles J. Williams, Gage & Tucker, Overland Park, KS, William L. Turner, Bernard J. Rhodes, R. Kent Sellers, Jeffrey M.

880 F.Supp. 1446 (1995) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Ernest M. FLEISCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 93-2062-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 17, 1995. *1447 H. David Barr, Charles J. Williams, Gage & Tucker, Overland Park, KS, William L. Turner, Bernard J. Rhodes, R. Kent Sellers, Jeffrey M. Pf

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1409 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1410 OPINION This appeal is from a judgment of wrongful death in which liability was established by applica

Opinion CHIN, J. We granted review to address the validity of noncompetition agreements in California and the permissible scope of employment release agreements. We limited our review to the following issues: (1) To what extent does Business and Professions Code section 166001 prohibit employee noncompetition agreements; and (2) is a contract provision requiring an employee to re

Andrea J. Hancock, et al. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, et al., No. 57, September Term, 2021. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT – NEGLIGENCE – NEGLIGENT HIRING OR RETENTION OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR One who hires an independent contractor is not liable to an employee of that contractor for injuries caused by the contractor’s negligence in performing the work for which it was hired. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT – NEGLIGENCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS – DUTY OF CARE The duty of a contractor or subcon

Andrea Jo Hancock, et al. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, et al., No. 57, September Term, 2021. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT – NEGLIGENCE – NEGLIGENT HIRING OR RETENTION OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR One who hires an independent contractor is not liable to an employee of that contractor for injuries caused by the contractor’s negligence in performing the work for which it was hired. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT – NEGLIGENCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS – DUTY OF CARE The duty of a contractor or subcon

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE METLIFE INC. DERIVATIVE ) Consol. C.A. No. 2019-0452- LITIGATION ) SG ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 11, 2020 Date Decided: August 17, 2020 Kurt M. Heyman and Gillian L. Andrews, of HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; OF C

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, District Judge. The court has before it the motion of Defendants to strike Plaintiffs’ deposition errata *570sheets and Plaintiffs’ motion to strike portions of Defendants’ rebuttal expert report and for other sanctions. The complaint underlying the motions at issue alleges that antitrust violations w

[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2018-Ohio-637.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-17-26 v. JINETTA L. THOMPSON, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Seneca County Common Pleas Court Trial