Cases

In re Edward L. Collins, applying for Remedial Writ from the First Judicial District, Parish of Caddo, No. 110617. Denied.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHER MOTIONS Marcia S. Krieger, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 1175, 1185), the Plaintiffs’ response .(# 1246, 1265), and the Defendants’ reply (# 1294, 1295, 1298); the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (#

OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice When a trial court dismisses a case under the equitable doctrine of forum non conveniens, must the trial court include in its order of dismissal a “return-jurisdiction provision,”-which would allow the plaintiff to reinstate the case in the original forum should the foreign forum become unavailable? The federal courts are

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-375 No. COA21-313 Filed 7 June 2022 Durham County, No. 19 CVS 1313 GUILFORD ARCHIE, III, Plaintiff, v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. Appeal by Plaintiff from order entered 2 March 2021 by Judge Orlando F. Hudson, Jr., in Durham Count

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-375 No. COA21-313 Filed 7 June 2022 Durham County, No. 19 CVS 1313 GUILFORD ARCHIE, III, Plaintiff, v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. Appeal by Plaintiff from order entered 2 March 2021 by Judge Orlando F. Hudson, Jr., in Durham Count

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA22-794 Filed 20 June 2023 Durham County, No. 21 CVS 1998 ARNOLD MAYNARD, JENNIFER MAYNARD, and HAROLD ELLIS, Plaintiffs, v. JUNE CROOK, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from orders entered 3 February, 4 February, 9 February, and 13 June 2022 by Judge Josephine Kerr Davis in Durham County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 April 202

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 17, 2014 Session JENICA DEBOER HALL v. JEFFREY GLEN HALL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County No. V-10-358 Lawrence Puckett, Judge No. E2013-01984-COA-R3-CV-FILED-AUGUST 14, 2014 This post-divorce matter presents the primary issue of whether the trial court properly calculated

621 F.3d 1069 (2010) Nicholas B. DELIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RIALTO, a Public Entity; City of Rialto Fire Department, a Public Agency; Stephen C. Wells, Individually and as the Fire Chief for the City of Rialto; Mike Peel, Individually and as Battalion Chief for the City of Rialto; Frank Bekker, Individually and as Battalion Chief for the City of Rialto; Steve A. Filarsky, Individually and as an Internal Affairs Investigator for the Ci

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 28-AUG-2026 10:31 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻDIkt. 65 OPCD _____________________

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 28-AUG-2026 10:31 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 197 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 198 I. INTRODUCTION Renewal of a judgment is a ministerial act performed by a co

233 Cal.App.3d 14 (1991) 284 Cal. Rptr. 222 DONALD L. VAUGHN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MOHAMMED IQBAL NOOR, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B048516. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. August 8, 1991. *16 COUNSEL Gilbert, Kelly, Crowley & Jennett, Cl

308 F.Supp.2d 709 (2004) James G. LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,[1] P.A. Terrangi, Dr. Iberra,[2] Dr. Vernon Smith,[3] Charlyne Broughman-Critzer, Cathy Couther, Laurel Corners, Dr. Lalani McCann, James Keeling, Dr. Hasan Ozinal, Sally Casebolt, Dr. M.G. Haque, Frederick J. Schilling, III, and Ms. Dodson, Defendants. No. 2:02CV869. United St

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HOWARD LAVELLE TATE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2009-A-75 Steve Dozier, Judge No. M2010-02555-CCA-R3-CD Filed December 17, 2012 The defendant, Howard Lavelle Tate, was convicted of two counts of the sale of over 0.5 grams o

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT The plaintiff, Earl Sageman, filed a pro se complaint in this court on March 24, 2008. He also submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff indicates in his complaint that he owns a farm and states that the “defendants” are seeking foreclosure against him on that farm. Plaintiff names as defendants the United St

527 S.E.2d 566 (1999) 241 Ga. App. 305 HOOKS v. COBB CENTER PAWN & JEWELRY BROKERS, INC. No. A99A2439. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 10, 1999. Reconsideration Denied December 6, 1999. Certiorari Denied May 5, 2000. *567 Kris K. Skaar, Marietta, James M. Feagle,

848 F.Supp. 78 (1994) Earl ROBERTSON, v. BURGER KING, INC. et al. Civ. A. No. 93-2828. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 5, 1994. Earl Robertson, pro se. Carolyn B. Witherspoon, McGlinchey, Stafford & Lang, Little Rock, AR, for defendant. James Rodney Holland, II, McGlinchey, Stafford & Lang, New Orleans, LA, Carolyn B. Wither

05/23/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 12, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GLENN ROBY, JR., AND KEVYN DESHAWN ALLEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2016-C-1716 Steve Dozier, Judge

641 S.E.2d 619 (2007) HARRIS v. The STATE. No. A06A1904. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 1, 2007. *621 Jonathan R. Melnick, Atlanta, for appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. A DeKalb County jury found Melvin H

ROBERTSON, Justice, for the Court I. This appeal arises from a partition action and raises questions of pleading and proof. Because the trial court ordered partition on the complaint of the original plaintiff, and because there was no independent side dispute between the two defendants who answered, it does not matter that one defendant in partition had filed no cross-claim against his