Cases

877 P.2d 1063 (1994) Kevin Neil JENKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 24602. Supreme Court of Nevada. July 26, 1994. Torvinen & Torvinen, Elko, for appellant. Frankie Sue Del Papa, Atty. Gen., Carson City, and Marshall S. Smith, Dist. Atty., Elko County, for respondent. STEFFEN, Justice. OPINION

915 P.2d 895 (1996) Robert L. ALLUM, Appellant, v. VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA, Valley Capital Corporation, Valley Mortgage Company, Kenneth Callahan, Arthur Daniel Ryssman and Perry Diloreto, Respondents. Robert L. ALLUM, Appellant, v. VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA, a Nevada State Chartered Banking Association; Nevada First Development Corporation, a Banking Holding Company and a Nevada Corporation; Valley Mortgage Company, a Mortgage Company and

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 22-P-208 Appeals Court COMMONWEALTH vs

2020 IL App (3d) 180551 Opinion filed December 21, 2020 Modified upon denial of rehearing February 8, 2021 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT

2020 IL App (3d) 180551 Opinion filed December 21, 2020 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2020 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy

Filed 11/20/24; Certified for Publication 12/19/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX ANNALYCIA JENKINS, 2d Civ. No. B333759 (Super. Ct. No. 22CV-0564) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County) v. DERMATOLOGY MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendant and Appellan

PALMER, J., dissenting. The majority concludes that Detective Michael Morgan of the Newington police department did not violate the rights of the defendant, Christopher Jenkins, under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution when Morgan conducted a consent search of the defendant’s vehicle following his lawful stop of the defendant for a traffic violation in Newington at a

663 P.2d 1186 (1983) STATE of Nevada, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Appellant, v. Valerie JENKINS, Respondent. No. 13747. Supreme Court of Nevada. June 9, 1983. *1187 D. Brian McKay, Atty. Gen., Larry B. Bernard and Steven F. Stucker, Deputy Attys. Gen., Carson City, for appellant. Kenneth J. Jordan, Carson City, for respo

AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Non-Party Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Non-Party Chipotle Services, LLC's (collectively "Chipotle") Motion for Contempt (Dkt. # 89). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. BACKGROUND Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") in 1938. The

DAVIS, Justice: This appeal was brought by Jeffrey Jenkins and his spouse M. Jean MeNabb, Plaintiffs below and Petitioners herein, from a summary judgment order of the Circuit Court of Harrison County. The trial court’s order granted summary judgment in favor of the City of Elkins, Stephen P. Stanton, and National Union Fire Insurance Company. The order also granted summary judgment in part to Westfield Insurance Company and

JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Jack Jenkins appeals an Order of the District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County, denying his Petition for Writ of Certiorari or Supervisory Control. We affirm. ¶2 We address the following issue on appeal: Did the District Court

ORDER JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 10, 16.) Having .thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion and DENIES Plaintiffs motion for the reasons explained herein.1

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The Supreme Court has repeatedly— and often unanimously — reversed our circuit’s decisions granting § 2254 relief. For example, in its four most recent terms, the Supreme Court has reversed us fourteen times in cases involving our application of AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, ten of which reversals have been unanimous. Most recently,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. Plaintiff IBD, Inc., and Defen-dani/Debtor Thomas Scott Jenkins both seek summary judgment in this proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a *825debt under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(4) and (a)(6). Plaintiffs motion is granted. Defenda

861 A.2d 827 (2004) 182 N.J. 112 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leardee D. JENKINS, Defendant-Respondent. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued September 28, 2004. Decided December 16, 2004. *829 Carol M. Henderson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter C. Harvey, At

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 171) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Stephan Jenkins; Bradley Hargreaves; Third Eye Blind, Inc.; 3EB Touring, Inc.; and Stephan Jenkins Productions, Inc. bring the current motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, partial summary judgment of Plaintiff Anthony Frediane

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,104 SHARRON JENKINS, Appellant, v. CHICAGO PACIFIC CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A district court's grant of summary judgment on fewer

849 P.2d 1055 (1993) Kevin Neil JENKINS, Petitioner, v. The FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE OF NEVADA, In and For the COUNTY OF ELKO, and the Honorable Thomas Love Stringfield, District Judge, Respondents. No. 22973. Supreme Court of Nevada. March 24, 1993. Gary D. Fairman, Ely, for petitioner. Marshall Smith, Dist. Atty., Elko County, for respond

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MÁRCIA S. KRIEGER, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Magistrate Judge’s September 3, 2014 Recommendation (#30) that the Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (# 18) against Defendant Jenkins be granted (and the claims against the Doe Defendants be dismissed). More than 1