Cases

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 171) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Stephan Jenkins; Bradley Hargreaves; Third Eye Blind, Inc.; 3EB Touring, Inc.; and Stephan Jenkins Productions, Inc. bring the current motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, partial summary judgment of Plaintiff Anthony Frediane

272 Kan. 1366 (2002) 39 P.3d 47 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MICHAEL L. JENKINS, Appellant. No. 86,320. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed February 1, 2002. *1368 Craig Shultz, of Law Office of Craig Shultz, P.A., of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. Debra

[Cite as Quester v. Quester, 2024-Ohio-1456.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) NICOLE M. QUESTER C.A. No. 30589 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BRADLEY A.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,430 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. J.L.J., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Prosecutors generally have wide latitude in crafting

[Cite as Kasper v. Kasper, 2013-Ohio-3711.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) REBECCA TAYLOR KASPER C.A. No. 26755 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JOHN A. KASPER, JR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KAISER CEMENT AND GYPSUM CORP. et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants; LONDON MARKET INSURERS, Defendant and Appellant; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Cross-defendant and Appellant; GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.,

[Cite as Guggenbiller v. Guggenbiller, 2011-Ohio-3622.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) LEE SCOTT GUGGENBILLER C.A. No. 10CA009871 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERE

203 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2001) William WINTERS, Plaintiff, v. State of FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. No. 8:00-CV-1567-T-EAJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 13, 2001. *1306 *1307 Wolfgang M. Florin, Chrisptoher D. Gray, Angela E. Outten, Florin

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA ANOTHER PLANET ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. S277893 Ninth Circuit 21-16093 Northern District of California 3:20-cv-07476-VC May 23, 2024 Chief J

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN No. 19-17213 FRANCISCO; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:19-cv-04717- PJH v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a federal agency; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency; CHAD F. WOLF, in hi

MANDELBAUM, District Judge. The third party defendant and the defendant move to stay plaintiff from taking the oral testimony of the defendant, pursuant to a notice to take deposition. The motion also requests that the production of certain books and records in conjunction with the examination, pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum, be stayed. With respect to the examination before trial, it appears to be th

19-3591, 19-3595 New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Make the Road New York v. Cuccinelli UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 2, 2020 Decided: August 4, 2020 Docket Nos. 19-3591, 19-3595 STATE OF N

713 F.Supp.2d 595 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. John JOHNSON. Criminal Action No. 04-17. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. May 18, 2010. *602 Brian P. Marcelle, Mark A. Miller, Michael William Magner, Michael M. Simpson, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Orleans, LA, for United States of America. ORD

Pashman, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I am in substantial accord with the majority holding in this case and the companion case of Jansco v. Waldron, 70 N. J. 320 (1976), concerning the power of a municipality to sub-delegate the rule-making authority which it derives from N. J. S. A. 40A :14-118 (formerly N. J. S. A. 40:47-1). I also concur in

It is suggested in brief of appellant's counsel that the trial court held section 9955 of the Code of 1923 unconstitutional upon the authority of Western Atlantic R. R. v. Henderson, 279 U.S. 639, 49 S.Ct. 445, 73 L.Ed. 884. The record does not disclose such an express ruling by the trial court, though the giving of certain charges, at the request of the defendant, would indicate that sai

A jury has found that on September 13, 1934, Grace Wynne shot and killed Mary Thompson. She was tried, found guilty and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment, December 29, 1941 — January 2, 1942. From the facts and circumstances as detailed by the State's witnesses the jury reasonably found that in shooting and killing Mary Thompson she acted purposefully and with malice and was therefore guilty of murder in the second degree. Briefly the background of the homicide is this: the

51 F.2d 936 (1931) HURT et al. v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO.[*] No. 400. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. August 5, 1931. Arnold C. Todd and Austin M. Cowan, both of Wichita, Kan., for appellants. Wm. C. Michaels, of Kansas City, Mo., and Richard E. Bird, of Wichita, Kan. (Meservey, Michaels, Blackmar, Newkirk & Eager, of Kansas City, Mo.,

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge. Dowling, a seaman, sued the Isthmian Steamship Corporation to recover wages, statutory penalties and subsistence. Isthmian noticed deposition of Dowling, which he moved to vacate. T-his was denied. An appeal taken from this order was dismissed because not a finality. Thereafter, the District Judge or