Cases

489 F.Supp.2d 538 (2007) Allene W. BRICE, Plaintiff, v. Terry JENKINS, Director, Virginia Beach Department of Human Services, Janice Roussel, Fraud Investigator, Virginia Beach Department of Human Services, Sonia Rose, Fraud Investigator, Virginia Beach Department of Human Services, City of Virginia Beach Office of the Commonwealth Attorney, Harvey L. Bryant, Commonwealth Attorney, and Candice R. Beasley, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, Defendan

515 S.E.2d 483 (1999) James David LILLEY, Plaintiff, Sheila Lilley, Intervenor Plaintiff, v. BLUE RIDGE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, and Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, Incorporated, Defendants. No. COA97-1219. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 18, 1999. *484 Blanchard, Jenkins & Miller, P.A. by Robert O. J

People v Jenkins (2020 NY Slip Op 03340) People v Jenkins 2020 NY Slip Op 03340 Decided on June 12, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. However, with respect to the assessment of costs against the appellant, this cause is reversed in part because of non-compliance with Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984) by failure to give the required notice to the defendant. The state may move for the imposition of costs, upon notice to the defendant, should they seek to do so. No gain time shall be forfeited for failure to pay the cos

PER CURIAM. Leon Jenkins brought suit against Southern Farm Bureau Casualty (SFBC), under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, after he was forced to resign based on the threat of termination as SFBC’s agency manager in Malvern, Arkansas, at the age of 59. After trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of SFBC finding Mr. Jenkins was not an employee of SFBC, but an independent contractor.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 02-1779WA _____________ Leon Jenkins, * * Appellant, * * On Appeal from the United v. * States District Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Robert Lilley brought an action against BTM Corporation (“BTM”) alleging age discrimination and retaliatory discharge in violation of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101 et seq.; willfulness under state and federal law with respect to both age

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Leon Jenkins appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment on his claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (the ADEA). The District Court dismissed his claim on the ground that, as an independent contractor, he was not covered by the ADEA. The issue before this Court is whether Mr. Jenkins prov

OPINION AND ORDER DOUGLAS E. MILLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Amanda Deanne Smith (“Smith”), filed this action to recover for injuries arising from her arrest at the home of a friend on September 21, 2006. She has alleged state law tort claims, and constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against two officers involved in the arrest, Officer R.R. Ray (“Officer Ray”) a

CONERY, Judge. The defendant, GoAuto Insurance Company (GoAuto), appeals the trial court's partial summary judgment in favor of its insured, Shantanya Thibeaux (Mrs. Thibeaux), in which the trial court found that GoAuto was liable under its policy's collision coverage for damages to Mrs. Thibeaux's 2008 Ford Mustang (Mustang). The vehicle at issue was involved in a one car accident while being driven by Jairi Thibeaux, an excluded d

CONERY, Judge. The defendant, GoAuto Insurance Company (GoAuto), appeals the trial court's partial summary judgment in favor of its insured, Shantanya Thibeaux (Mrs. Thibeaux), in which the trial court found that GoAuto was liable under its policy's collision coverage for damages to Mrs. Thibeaux's 2008 Ford Mustang (Mustang). The vehicle at issue was involved in a one car accident while being driven by Jairi Thibeaux, an excluded d

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _______________________________ BAP NO. MB 23-007 _______________________________ Bankruptcy Case No. 22-11302-JEB _______________________________ SERGE OHANNES KARAMOUSSAYAN, Debtor. ______________________________

JABAR, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. [¶ 39] I concur with the Court’s decision affirming the single justice’s decision granting the motion to quash, but I dissent from the Court’s decision vacating that portion of the single justice’s judgment determining that there was no violation of the Maine Bar Rules. While I agree with the Court’s conclusion that there

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Humphreys, Decker and Russell Argued at Virginia Beach, Virginia AARON MARKEITH GERALD OPINION BY v. Record No. 0731-16-1 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS OCTO

BRYAN, Judge, dissenting. Undisputed Facts The following facts are undisputed. In 2005, Mobile Attic, Inc., and Mobile Attic Franchising, Inc. (collectively “MA”), which rent portable storage facilities, began discussing with TotalCom, Inc. (“TC”), an advertising agency, the possibility of having professional television commercials produced for MA. MA was represented in those discus

[Cite as State v. Hawkins, 2021-Ohio-2899.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-546 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CR-6414) Marzett Hawkins, III, : (REGUL

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,105 TYRONE JAMAAL WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 31293 IN THE 196TH DISTRICT COURT HUNT COUNTY KELLER, P.J., delivered the opinion of the

OPINION Petitioner, Robert Allen Frederick, appeals from an order of the superior court denying him a writ of mandate directing respondent justice court, in effect, to order the diversion of his criminal prosecution for violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377 (former § 11910), possession of amphetamines, a misdemeanor, pursuant to Penal Code section1000 et seq., without including the follow

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 28-FEB-2022 02:37 PM Dkt. 140 MO