Cases

Petition for rehearing denied.

PER CURIAM. Respondent Percy Hutton accused two friends, Derek Mitchell and Samuel Simmons Jr., of stealing a sewing machine, in which he had hidden $750. Mitchell and Simmons denied the accusation, but Hutton remained suspicious. On the night of September 16, 1985, he lured the pair into his car and, after pointing a gun at each, drove them around town in search of the machine. By nigh

967 F.Supp. 277 (1997) Roger J. JENKINS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. John J. HUTTON, Jr., M.D., Defendant. No. C-1-95-367. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 11, 1997. *278 *279 William Bernard Singer, Schwartz, Manes & Ruby, Cincinnati, OH, for Roger Jenkins, Jr. <

[Cite as State v. Hutton, 2022-Ohio-4509.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111432 v. : PERCY HUTTON, :

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE 23(b)(2) CLASS CERTIFICATION CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge Consolidated Plaintiffs and Jenkins Plaintiffs, current and former collegiate athletes, jointly move for certification of injunctive relief classes. Defendants, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and a group of Division I conferences, oppose the motion. After considering the parties’ subm

| iBROWN, J., dissenting, The doctrine of continuing wrong is applicable where an entire course of conduct combines to produce an injury. The doctrine of continuing wrong is not an equitable doctrine; rather, it defines when an act, omission, or neglect took place. When this doctrine attaches, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the wrongful act ceases, and at that point the plaintiff may b

164 B.R. 700 (1994) In re Hubert Earl JENKINS and Jewell Deloress Jenkins, Debtors. Gerald T. LANE, Plaintiff, v. Hubert Earl JENKINS, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 92-15305-8P7. Adv. No. 93-488. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 2, 1994. Josiah E. Hutton and Phillip E. Kuhn, Winter Haven, FL, for plaintiff. Thomas Joel Chawk

32 F.Supp.2d 1024 (1999) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Michael JENKINS, Defendant. No. 98-20044. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Danville/Urbana Division. January 14, 1999. *1025 Everett Laury, Hutton, Laury, Hesser, Lietz & Wilcox, Danville, IL, for Plaintiff. Lawrence S. Beaumont, Assistant U.S.

01/31/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 15, 2019 Session HUTTON TEAM, LLC v. INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Greene County No. 2017-CV-251 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor ___________________________________

ORDER ELIZABETH A. JENKINS, United States Magistrate. THIS CAUSE comes on for consideration of plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production pf Documents (Dkt. 41), filed August 6, 1990, and Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories (Dkt. 42), filed August 10, 1990. Defendants filed their Response to plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. 44) on August 10, 1990, and their Response to plain

ORDER KOVACHEVICH, District Judge., THIS CAUSE comes on for consideration upon the magistrates’s report and recommendation recommending that: (1) plaintiffs’ Petition for Allowance of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (Dkt.210) be GRANTED insofar as plaintiffs are entitled to the recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees totalling $191,135.75 as the prevailing parties in this action; (2) that insofar a

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0216p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JAMES MAMMONE, │ Petitioner-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. Plaintiff IBD, Inc., and Defen-dani/Debtor Thomas Scott Jenkins both seek summary judgment in this proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a *825debt under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(4) and (a)(6). Plaintiffs motion is granted. Defenda

402 F.Supp. 823 (1975) Myron S. EICHEN, Plaintiff, v. E. F. HUTTON & CO., INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 72-510-GT. United States District Court, S. D. California. September 2, 1975. *824 Jenkins & Perry, by Rex Heeseman, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, by Michael L. Kirby

SWAIN, District Judge. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), imposes, among other things, certain notice and timing requirements on efforts by “debt collectors” to recover outstanding obligations. The term “debt collector” is defined, subject to exclusions not relevant here, to mean “any person who uses any instrumentality

Moyer, C.J. The state advances seven propositions of law in support of its appeal. Hutton, cross-appealing certain aspects of the court of appeals’ decision, asserts seven propositions of his own. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand to that court for further proceedings. I The court of appeals held that Eileen Sweeney’s testimony that Hutton

879 F.Supp. 1028 (1994) Robert H. GLAVOR, Plaintiff, v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., Lehman Brothers, a division of Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., Equicor, Equicor — Equitable HCA Corporation, Equicor Equitable Service Corporation as Administrator, The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Equicor, Inc., Cigna Companies, Defendants. No. C-93-1648 DLJ. United States District Court, N.D.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 127 This matter is before the court on appeal from the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division. Plaintiff-appellant, Virginia L. Hutton, is the surviving spouse of Walter A. Hutton, who died testate on January 15, 1987. Defendant-appellee, Sandra K. Rygalski, the executrix of Walter Hutton's estate

155 F.Supp.2d 60 (2001) Sarah GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. HUTTON, INGRAM, YUZEK, GAINEN, CARROLL & BERTOLOTTI, Defendant. No. 98CIV.1464(MGC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 15, 2001. *61 Victor M. Serby, Esq., New York, for Plaintiff. *62 Jones Hirsch Connors &

833 F.2d 909 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,676, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,545W. Floyd MESSER, Sr., individually, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.E.F. HUTTON & CO., a Delaware corporation, Raphael M. Kelly,individually, Henry Herschaft, individually,Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-3602. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec. 7, 1987.