Cases

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-3053 LT Case No. 2018-CF-8277-A _____________________________ STEVEN BERNARD JENKINS, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ 3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Jonathan D. Sacks, Judge. Steven Bernard Jenkins, Jr.,

ACCEPTED 05-14-00195-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 3, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00195-CR VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District

Order entered August 29, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00195-CR VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Order entered October 22, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00196-CR VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-3166 _____________________________ SCOTTIE BERNARD JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction. August 31, 2018 PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is denied

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-2584 _____________________________ SCOTTIE BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Judge. July 27, 2018 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. WOLF, LEWIS

Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 22, 2014 Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00196-CR VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Order entered June 4, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00195-CR No. 05-14-00196-CR VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 15, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 158298 & (56)

Order entered July 7, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00195-CR VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 23, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 158296 & (53)

Dismissed.

Per Curiam. *425The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits. Wolf, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.

ST. BERNARD PARISH * NO. 2019-CA-0604 GOVERNMENT * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * RICHARD PERNICIARO, ET FOURTH CIRCUIT AL. * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

Opinion by Judge BERNARD T1 This appeal presents a question about the sentencing authority of a court in a criminal case. Can the court sentence a defendant who has been convicted of a felony to an indeterminate probationary term of ten years to life, even if the defendant is not a sex offender who has been convicted of a sex offense subject to sentencing under the Sex Offender Lifetime Supervision Act (SOLSA)

McClelland, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ; and one specification each of indecent assault and indecent language, in violation o

TOBIAS, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT AND ASSIGNS REASONS. I respectfully concur in the result reached by the majority. I write separately to emphasize, inter alia, that the trial court was required to try the plaintiffs case de novo rather than to either (a) give deference to the decision of the St. Bernard Parish (“SBP”) Council and/or (b) accept the evidence received before the Council as

McClelland, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted mem*695bers. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920; one specification of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.