Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Jeffrey-Steven of the House of Jarrett v. State of Hawaii”
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
122 F.3d 58 PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company,Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, andLorillard Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs, Appellants,v.L. Scott HARSHBARGER, Attorney General of the Commonwealthof Massachusetts, and David H. Mulligan,Massachusetts Commissioner of PublicHealth, Defendants, Appellees.UNITED STATES TOBACCO COMPANY, Brown & Williamson TobaccoCorporation, Conwood C
Tom Benson v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00121-CR 5475449 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/29/2015 3:22:17 PM
Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.public domain
FRANCOIS, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 19, 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................215 PROCEDURAL HISTORY.........................................................217 SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD......................................221
US Tobacco Co v. Harshbargerpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 97-8022 PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, AND LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, Plaintiffs, Appellants,
Nicholson v. Williamspublic domain
203 F.Supp.2d 153 (2002) Sharwline NICHOLSON, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Nat WILLIAMS, et al. Defendants. Ekaete Udoh, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Nicholas Scoppetta, et al.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P
Phippen v. Durhampublic domain
MONCURE, J., after stating the case, proceeded: If the question were res integra, “Whether a deed of trust conveying all the property of a debtor for the benefit of such of his creditors as may within a specified time release him from all further claims; and providing that the surplus of the trust fund after satisfying the accepting creditors should be paid to the debtor, is valid against the creditors who do not
Phippen v. Durhampublic domain
MONCURE, J., after stating the case, proceeded: If the question were res integra, “Whether a deed of trust conveying all the property of a debtor for the benefit of such of his creditors as may within a specified time release him from all further claims; and providing that the surplus of the trust fund after satisfying the accepting creditors should be paid to the debtor, is valid against the creditors who do not
Phippen v. Durhampublic domain
MONCURE, J., after stating the case, proceeded: If the question were res integra, “Whether a deed of trust conveying all the property of a debtor for the benefit of such of his creditors as may within a specified time release him from all further claims; and providing that the surplus of the trust fund after satisfying the accepting creditors should be paid to the debtor, is valid against the creditors who do not