Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jeffrey Thomas Kearney”
OPINION OF THE COURT ORLOFSKY, District Judge. Jeffrey Anderson appeals from his conviction after a jury trial on a three-count superseding indictment charging him with carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 (the “carjacking statute”), using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), and possession of a f
Jeffrey Lindke v. David Combspublic domain
FILED Jun 19 2023, 8:36 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. Mallettpublic domain
285 Wis.2d 236 (2005) 2005 WI 129 701 N.W.2d 523 Steven THOMAS, a Minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, Susan M. Gramling, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Clinton L. MALLETT, Billie R. Mallett, and Germantown Mutual Insurance Co., Defendants, AMERICAN CYANAMID Co., Atlantic Richfield Co., E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Co., NL Industries, Inc., SCM Chemicals, Inc., Sherwin-Williams Co., ConAgra Grocer
Kearney v. Vance Cty. B.O.E.public domain
The majority in the present case provided a thorough recitation of case law regarding the duty of a school bus driver to assure that his passenger has reached "a place of safety" and is otherwise out of danger; however, the majority erred in failing to consider that even though a school bus driver's duty to his passenger may extinguish once the passenger is in the "place of safety," his duty to a child pedestrian, including one that may have been his passenger, does not extinguish. In the pre
Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milacron Inc.public domain
LIVELY, Circuit Judge. In this patent case the district court found that Kearney & Trecker (K&T) had practiced fraud on the Patent Office and had attempted to monopolize the domestic market for “multi-function machine tools with automatic tool changers.” Though the district court found that one of the patents in litigation owned by K&T was valid and infringed by Cincinnati Milacron (Milacron), it was held to be une
JEFFREY D. ALLEN v. MAURICE SHEPHERDpublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 13
Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.public domain
[J-2-2015] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., EAKIN, BAER, TODD, STEVENS, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 692 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence : entered on 12/18/2013 in the Court of :
John Thomas Aiken v. Angelique S. Naylorpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00519-CV 3972059 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
GRANT, Senior District Judge. This appeal arises from convictions for two bank robberies. In the first, No. 84-CR-132, a jury found defendants-appellants guilty of the December 27, 1983 armed robbery of the Cudahy Marine Bank in Cudahy, Wisconsin, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 2113(a) and 2113(d). A fourth robber, Gray, pled guilty
In re Henry B. Wilson, Jr., Revocable Trustpublic domain
Funke, J. This matter concerns the administration of the "Henry B. Wilson, Jr., Revocable Trust Dated June 27, 2002" (Henry's Trust or Trust), and the related issue of the administration of three subtrusts created by Henry's Trust upon his death. Henry B. Wilson, Jr.'s daughter, Lou Ann Goding (Lou Ann), filed suit, asserting the mismanagement of Henry's Trust, and following a trial, t
Bond v. Beardpublic domain
539 F.3d 256 (2008) Jesse BOND, Appellant (No. 06-9002), v. Jeffrey BEARD; William Stickman; Joseph Mazurkiewicz; The District Attorney of The County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Appellant (No. 06-9003). Nos. 06-9002, 06-9003. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 8, 2008. Opinion Filed August 20, 200
Ayers v. Myerspublic domain
ULRICH, Chief Judge, Presiding Judge. John and Nedra Ayers appeal the judgment of the trial court quieting title to real estate in Clay County. The trial court found title vested in Kenneth and Loberta Myers. The Ayers raise two points of error on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in sustaining the Myers’ motion for judgment at the close of the Ayers’ case because the appointment of the successor trustee, Thomas Munro, was i
Janod, Inc. v. Echo Entertainment, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Janod, Inc. (“Janod”) brings this action against Defendant Echo Entertainment, Inc. (“Echo”), alleging breach of contract, intentional and/or negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, and fraud. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to
Wilson v. Beardpublic domain
OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: In 1988, Zachary Wilson was convicted of the 1981 murder of Jamie Lamb, who was shot in a bar in the City of Philadelphia. Wilson was sentenced to death. During his post-conviction relief proceedings, he learned that the Commonwealth had withheld certain information from his counsel during trial that could have been used for impeachment purposes. He asserts that the Commonwealth
Imre v. Peacock Maritime SApublic domain
MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, JUDGE. Congress requires liability for negligence allegedly causing injuries to a longshoreman during stevedoring operations be governed by a federal workers’ compensation act known as the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (“Act”). We often must sort out liability when the injured workman sues several parties with some contact with the Vessel. Defendants seeking an early dismissa
Holland v. Goordpublic domain
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Darryl Holland (“Holland”), an inmate and practicing Muslim, asserts that defendant prison officials Glenn Goord, Anthony J. Annuei, Anthony F. Zon, Thomas Schoellkopf, John Barb-era, and Martin Kearney collectively, (“Ap-pellees”) 1 unconstitutionally burdened his religious exercise when they ordered him to provide a urine sample within a
McFadden, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from the trial court's orders dismissing, for failure to state a claim, a complaint brought by Villa Sonoma at Perimeter Summit Condominium Association, Inc. a/k/a Villa Sonoma Condominium Association, Inc. ("Villa Sonoma") against various defendants associated with commercial property insurance that Villa Sonoma obtained to cover a condomini
Fludd v. Fischerpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Jovan Fludd appeals from a judgment of the District Court granting the motion of defendants-appellees (“defendants”) to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment as to all of Fludd’s claims. These claims alleged a variety of constitu*72tional violations stemming from Fludd’s long-term confinement in administrative segregation. On December 8, 2012, this Cou
Tarapchak v. Lackawanna Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM. KEARNEY, District Judge. ' Arrested persons awaiting trial are entitled to due process whether they are detained in prison or released on bail. If the state has probable cause to believe a person violated terms of house arrest on bail, it can investigate and recommend charges for bail violations. We now face an apparent wrinkle where Lackawanna County allows its Director of House Arrest, accom
Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commissionpublic domain
263 Wis.2d 709 (2003) 2003 WI 103 666 N.W.2d 816 Honorable Jeffrey A. WAGNER, Petitioner, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, Respondent, STATE of Wisconsin, Respondent. No. 02-0375-OA. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument October 9, 2002. Decided July 10, 2003.