Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Marcy S. Friedman, J. Petitioners Develop Don’t Destroy (Brooklyn), Inc. (DDDB) and Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council, Inc. (PHNDC) move, under the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (CPLR 8601), for payment by respondent Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by petitioners in prosecuting these CPLR article 78

OPINION OF THE COURT Marcy S. Friedman, J. Procedural History These CPLR article 78 proceedings, brought under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), challenge modification of the plan for development of the Atlantic Yards Project in Brooklyn (the Project). In prior proceedings, petitioner Develop Don’t Destroy (Brooklyn), Inc. and petitioners Prospect Heights Neighborhood Dev

*618OPINION OF THE COURT Marcy S. Friedman, J. In these CPLR article 78 proceedings, petitioner Develop Don’t Destroy (Brooklyn), Inc. (DDDB) and petitioners Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council, Inc. and others (collectively PHND) challenged the affirmance, on September 17, 2009, by respondent New York State Urban Development Corp., doin

140 F.Supp.2d 1026 (2001) AMERICAN CABLE TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AT & T CORP., Defendant. No. 99-5070-CV-SW-4. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southwestern Division. April 25, 2001. *1027 Steven Hurley Mustoe, Kurlbaum, Stoll, Seaman, Suter & Mustoe, Kansas City, MO, for American Cable Tech

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1533-08 JEFFREY ROUSE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY HERVEY , J., delivered the opinio

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-00835-COA JEFFREY VAN QUINN APPELLANT v. SHADE LARUE QUINN APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/15/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. FRANKLIN C. MCKENZIE JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFFREY BENKO; CAMILO No. 13-15185 MARTINEZ; ANA MARTINEZ; FRANK SCINTA; JACQUELINE SCINTA; SUSAN D.C. No. HJORTH; SANDRA KUHN; JESUS 2:12-CV-0024- GOMEZ; SILVIA GOMEZ; DONNA MMD-GWF HERRERA; ANTOINETTE GILL; JESSE HENNIGAN; KIM MOORE; THOMAS MOORE, Nevada residents; OPINION RAYMOND SANSOTA; FRANCINE SANSOTA, Ohio residents,

ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE This matter comes before me on Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration or, in the Alternative Certification for Interlocutory Appeal (Doc. # 68). Oral argument will not materially aid in the resolution of this motion. For the reasons stated below, I grant Defendants’ Motion. Because I grant Defendants’ Motion and thereby grant Defendants’ previous Motion for Summary Judgment

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR JEFFREY K. ELNICKI, ) No. ED99455 ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. )

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank”) appeals the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Chapman, B.J.), granting the motion of James W. Giddens, Trustee for the SIPA Liquidation of Lehman Brothers Inc. (“the Trustee”) to expunge FirstBank’s claim, and denying First-Bank’s motion for summary judgment. See A3556, A3571.

463 F.Supp.2d 459 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 4, 2006. James R. DeVita, Bryan Cave LLP, John A. Townsend, Townsend & Jones LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant Carol Warley. John M. Hillebrecht, Justin S. Weddle, Kevin M. Downing, Stanle

BYE, Circuit Judge. Thomas J. Anderson, an attorney, and his wife Karen L. Anderson brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three officers and a prosecutor for their actions during an investigation and prosecution that resulted in Anderson’s conviction for solicitation of a felony. Thomas Anderson alleges violations of his Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment

482 F.Supp.2d 360 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 17, 2007. *361 John M. Hillebrecht, Stanley J. Okula, Jr., Rita Glavin, Margaret Garnett, New York City, Kevin M. Downing, Garden City, NY, Assistant United States

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT [35, 37] AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY [36] MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge. This patent action is before the Court on three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants eClinicalWorks, LLC and Pulse Systems, Inc. (Docket Nos. 35, 36, 37). Pulse Systems and eClinicalWorks separately mov

440 F.Supp.2d 315 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 Crim. 0888 LAK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 25, 2006. *316 *317 Justin S. Weddle, Kevin M. Downing, Stanley J. Okula, Jr., Margaret Garnett, Assistant United States A

424 F.Supp.2d 720 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 CRIM 0888(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 7, 2006. *721 *722 Justin S. Weddle, Kevin M. Downing, Stanley J. Okula, Jr., Margaret Garnett, Assistant United States Attorney

269 Kan. 159 (2000) 4 P.3d 592 CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, Appellee, v. CARL G. LOPP, Appellant. No. 83,815. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 21, 2000. Matthew T. Geiger, of Byran Cave LLP, of Overland Park, argued the cause, and Jeffrey D. Morris, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for appellant.

POOLER, Circuit Judge: Deborah Moss signed an arbitration agreement providing that any disputes between her and her payday lender would be resolved by arbitration before the National Arbitration Forum (“NAF”). When she tried, to take her case to arbitration, however, NAF refused to accept it pursuant to a consent decree that prohibited NAF from accepting consumer arbitrations. The district court (Bianco, J.) construe

429 F.Supp.2d 633 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 CRIM.0888(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 28, 2006. *634 *635 Justin S. Weddle, Kevin M. Downing, Stanley J. Okula, Jr., Margaret Garnett, Assistant United States Attorne