Cases

407 A.2d 1040 (1979) Samuel H. CITRON, Edith Citron, and William B. Weinberger, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. MERRITT-CHAPMAN & SCOTT CORPORATION, Louis E. Wolfson, Elkin B. Gerbert, Louis Goldberg, David Reich, and Cecil Wolfson, Defendants Below, Appellees. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted December 15, 1978. Decided September 10, 1979. Revised Octo

449 F.3d 415 John DOE I, John Doe II, American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Alberto GONZALES (In Official Capacity as Attorney General), Robert S. Mueller III (In Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation), Marion E. Bowman (In Official Capacity as Senior Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation), John Roe, Defendants-Appellants.

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Rocky Aspen Management 204 LLC (“RAM 204”) commenced this action *161against Hanford Holdings, LLC (“Han-ford”) seeking a declaratory judgment that RAM 204 is the owner of the majority of membership interests in Rocky Aspen LLC (“Rocky Aspen”), a Colorado limited liability c

2022 UT App 107 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. XAVIER SOTO, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200272-CA Filed September 1, 2022 Second District Court, Ogden Department The Honorable Joseph M. Bean

2024 UT App 191 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. RICKEY SCOTT HARRIS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220791-CA Filed December 27, 2024 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Brian G. Canne

ROBERT J. JONKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Lansing City Council voted down an ordinance that would have provided Plaintiff with a tax break in support of his proposed real estate development. Plaintiff says the decision was motivated by an improper desire to block affordable housing projects in Lansing, in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act, federal civil rights statutes, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Whether Pl

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners appeal from a judgment granting respondents’ preanswer motion to dismiss the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Petitioners seek a judgment reinstating petitioners John Nole and Jeffrey DeSarro to the position of firefighter and compelling respondent City of Utica to fill vacant positions in the City of Utica Bu

253 F.Supp.2d 459 (2003) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. ACUSPORT CORP., et al., Defendants. Faber Brothers, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company, Third Party Defendants. No. 99 CV 7037(JBW), 99 CV 3999(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 28, 2003. Charles E. Ba

Bernard S. Meyer, J. In this action for false arrest and for personal injuries sustained, it is claimed, through the use of excessive force in the making of the arrest plaintiffs move for discovery of any statement made by the arresting officer to the County Police Department or to the District Attorney. The first trial of the criminal charges against the infant plaintiff resulted in a mistrial and on second trial in a dismissal

2021 UT App 136 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. OMAR GUERRO, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190534-CA Filed December 9, 2021 Seventh District Court, Moab Department The Honorable Don M. Torgerson

JUSTICE BRADEN delivered the opinion of the court: Respondent, Electrical Insurance Trustees, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County adjudicating a subrogation lien. On appeal, respondent argues that the trial court erroneously applied the Illinois common fund doctrine as opposed to the doctrine of Federal preemption. We aff

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge, with whom J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring: This case cannot plausibly be distinguished from Barr v. Matteo1 and surely we are not at liberty to disregard the Supreme Court’s unmistakable holding therein. Perhaps that is all that really needs to be said

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation, Appellant, v. ROYAL CRANE, LLC d/b/a HUNTER CRANE, as assignee of action from CLOUTIER BROTHERS, INC., W.F. ROEMER INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., a Florida corporation, and FLORIDA HOME BUILDERS INSURANCE, INC.,

Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice LAMBERT. The question before this Court is whether the General Assembly may retroactively suspend KRS 18A.355, a statute that provides all employees of the Commonwealth of Kentucky an annual increment in their salaries of not less than five percent. The trial court answered in the affirmative. A notice of appeal was filed and this Court granted transfer of the appeal.

* Reporter's Note: A discretionary appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio was not allowed in (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 1426,685 N.E.2d 238. 1 Scott C. Summers, Trustee, and Craig P. McCurdy are the only parties entering appearances in this appeal. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONT

2025 UT App 35 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. SHAWN MICHAEL SMITH, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220135-CA Filed March 6, 2025 Fifth District Court, Cedar City Department The Honorable Matthew L. Bell

2025 UT App 162 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. JOEL SANCHEZ BARRIGA, Appellant. Opinion No. 20210818-CA Filed November 13, 2025 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable David J

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13330 PATRICIA WALSH GREENE1 & another2 vs. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.

653 N.E.2d 775 (1995) 274 Ill.App.3d 102 210 Ill.Dec. 580 Randy SCHOLTENS, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey SCHNEIDER et al., Defendants (Electrical Insurance Trustees, Respondent-Appellant). No. 1-92-3160. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. May 30, 1995. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 14

2026 UT App 29 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. DONALD DEE ANDERSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220321-CA Filed March 5, 2026 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards