⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jeffrey J Benedict and Barbara L Benedict”

Pyke v. Cuomopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-05-27 · Published · cited 49× · 567 F.3d 74; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11119; 2009 WL 1458030
567 F.3d 74 (2009) Joseph H. PYKE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Matthew Pyke, May P. Cole, Charles Benedict, Patricia A. Benedict, Julius M. Cook, Beverly J. Pyke, Edward Smoke, Selena M. Smoke, Margaret Pyke Thompson, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mario CUOMO, Thomas A. Constantine, Robert B. Leu, and Ronald R. Brooks, Defendants-Appellees.
Pyke v. Cuomopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
07-0334-cv(L), 07-3524(CON) Pyke v. Cuomo 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 ____________________________________ 6 7 August Term, 2008 8 9 (Argued: March 16, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009) 10 11 Docket Nos. 07-0334-cv(L), 07-352
Spencer v. Peterspublic domain
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013-08-21 · Published · cited 2× · 966 F. Supp. 2d 1146; 2013 WL 4498686; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119022
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART KRAUSE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Sharon Krause’s (“Krause”) second motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 139). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motion and the remainder of the file and hereby grants in part and denies in part th
District Court, District of Columbia · 1999-06-30 · Published · cited 19× · 53 F. Supp. 2d 38; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10083; 1999 WL 450794
53 F.Supp.2d 38 (1999) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-2436(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 30, 1999. *39 *40 Daniel Joseph Henry, Falls Church, VA, for plaintiff. Gerson Avery Zweifach, P
Mogell v. Franklinpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 219 F. Supp. 2d 657; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17691
MEMORANDUM ORDER D. BROOKS SMITH, Chief Judge. The notice of the settlement of this derivative action1 provided, inter alia, that CBS was to receive $250,000, to be paid by the insurance company that had issued the officers’ and directors’ policies, that otherwise would have been paid to settle a companion class action securities fraud case. William C. Rand, a
State v. Tammy R.public domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999-03-12 · Published · cited 1× · 204 W. Va. 575; 514 S.E.2d 631; 1999 W. Va. LEXIS 8
PER CURIAM: This appeal was filed by Tammy R.1, ap-pellani/respondent below, (hereinafter referred to as Tammy), from a ruling by the Circuit Court of Jefferson County. The circuit court placed Kia H. (hereinafter referred to as Kia), the daughter of Tammy, in permanent foster care with her paternal grandmother, Helen J., appellee/intervenor below2 (hereinafter referre
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-05-02 · Published · cited 45× · 923 F.3d 209
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. 1 *212 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts brought suit on October 6, 2017, to enjoin the enforcement of two federal Interim Final Rules (together, the "IFRs") promulgated by the United States Departments
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005-05-09 · Published · cited 16× · 369 F. Supp. 2d 163; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8606; 2005 WL 1107072
369 F.Supp.2d 163 (2005) ING PRINCIPAL PROTECTION FUNDS DERIVATIVE LITIGATION No. CIV. A. 03-12198JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 9, 2005. *164 *165 Thomas A. Arena, James N. Benedict, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, NY, Hung G. Ta, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &a;
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-09-21 · Published · cited 0× · 657 F.3d 1145
*1152 BLACK, Circuit Judge: In 2007, Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (Odyssey) discovered the remains of a 19th Century Spanish vessel in international waters west of the Straits of Gibraltar. Odyssey filed a verified admiralty complaint in rem against the shipwrecked vessel and it
Fleming v. Currypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013-08-20 · Published · cited 14× · 412 S.W.3d 723; 2013 WL 4429905; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 10438
OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In these consolidated appeals, we review the summary judgments granted to several hundred plaintiffs on their breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the attorney and law firm that represented them in their personal-injury claims arising from their use of diet drugs. The law firm screened tens of thousands of clients for eligibility to opt out of a class-action settleme
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 74× · 588 U.S. 29; 139 S. Ct. 2067; 204 L. Ed. 2d 452
Justice BREYER, with whom Justice KAGAN joins, concurring. I have long maintained that there is no single formula for resolving Establishment Clause challenges. See Van Orden v. Perry , 545 U.S. 677, 698, 125 S.C
District Court, District of Columbia · 1995-12-07 · Published · cited 9× · 909 F. Supp. 4; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18340; 1995 WL 736825
909 F.Supp. 4 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John C. YORK, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 93-0839 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 7, 1995. *5 Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney, and Dara Corrigan, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC. Of counsel were
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001-07-20 · Published · cited 3× · 155 F. Supp. 2d 1044; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11017; 2001 WL 863102
155 F.Supp.2d 1044 (2001) Dan LINNEMEIER, Patricia C. Corbat, Steve & Glenna Jehl, Ben & Rita Clemmer, Tom & Rosie O'Grady, Regina Martin, Francisco Carlos Avila, Jon Olinger, Senator Kent Adams Representative James Atterholt Representative James Buck Representative Charles Burton Representative Robert Cherry Representative Jerry Denbo Representative Jeffrey Espich Representative Ralph Foley Senator David Ford Representative David Frizzell Se
Washington Supreme Court · 2009-02-05 · Published · cited 7× · 200 P.3d 701
200 P.3d 701 (2009) COMMUNITY CARE COALITION OF WASHINGTON; Home Care of Washington, Inc.; The Fredrickson Home; Cynthia O'Neill, A Washington Citizen and Taxpayer; Ron Ralph and Lois Ralph, husband and wife and Washington Citizens and Taxpayers, Petitioners, v. Sam REED, Secretary of State, Respondent, and Linda Lee and People for Safe Quality Care, Intervenors/Respondents. No. 81857-6. Supreme Co
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 45 F. Supp. 3d 881; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120134; 2014 WL 4265847
OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. In this civil action, plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc., contend that defendants Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC have infringed the following eight patents related to a telephone relay system between deaf and hearing users: United States Patents Nos. 5,909,-482, 6,233,314, 6,594,346, 6,603,835, 7,319,-
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002-08-16 · Published · cited 3× · 219 F. Supp. 2d 657
219 F.Supp.2d 657 (2002) In re WESTINGHOUSE SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to the derivative action. Daniel Mogell, in his capacity as a shareholder, suing derivatively and individually, Plaintiff, v. Barbara H. Franklin, et al., Defendants, and CBS Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Nominal Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 91-354, 99-596. United States District
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 11:31:26 2022.12.27 Commission '00'07- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2023-NMCA-001 Filing Date: August 11,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04648
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by