Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jeffrey Gay and Cheryl Gay”
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Cole v. Appleton Papers, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Cole v. Appleton Papers, Inc., 2013-Ohio-3756.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO RALPH COLE, JR. : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 25674 v. : T.C. NO. 12CV2168 12CV2176 APPLETON PAPERS, INC., et al.
Heller v. Carnival Corp.public domain
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant, Carnival Corporation’s (“Carnival[’s]”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (“Motion”) [ECF No. 25] filed January 12, 2016. Plaintiff, Cheryl Heller (“Plaintiff’) filed a Response ... (“Response”) [ECF No. 31] on January 28, 2016; and Defendant filed its Reply ... (“Reply”) [ECF No. 40] on February 8, 201
8 F.3d 626 63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 182,63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,624Christopher D. ABURIME, Plaintiff-Appellant,Bobby W. Lucas; Blanche Clay; Joseph R. Richburg; SandraWilliams; Alvin Williams; Gwendolyn J. Stevens; LarryWashington; Marcia L. Atkins; Robert Garner; Richard M.Jones; James Baul; Sandra Holmes; Deartice Sanders;Susan Hagood, Plaintiffs,v.NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee,<
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Following a five week jury trial, Ferrell Travis Riley and Cheryll S. Coon were convicted of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (“RICO”), by committing seven predicate acts of racketeering, five of which were separately charged. Riley was also convicted of three counts of fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2
Mills v. Abbottpublic domain
350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
United States v. Cenicerospublic domain
FALLON, District Judge: This appeal follows the conviction of Jose Efrain Ceniceros for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The issue addressed is whether the seizure of evidence by a roving border patrol agent following a vehicle stop was supported by reasonable suspicion consistent with the Fourth Amendment. On appeal, Ceni
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. TASSIE KATHERINE
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
Good v. BEAR CANYON RANCH ASS'N, INC.public domain
160 P.3d 251 (2007) Timothy D. GOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEAR CANYON RANCH ASSOCIATION, INC., Terry and Cami L. Klein, Jerry and Lindsay Walls, John and Barbara Lawrence, Gulrez Malik, Robert Schooley, Michael and Betty Daunt, Louis and Rebecca Egebrecht, Michael and Susan K. Healy, Wesley Piwarczyk, Lyle and Beverly Breshears, Roger and Angela E. Norris, Parvez and Sohail Malik, Gerald M. and Michelle A. Cook, Tod and Rita Schadler, Robert P
Kljun v. Morrisonpublic domain
[Cite as Kljun v. Morrison, 2016-Ohio-2939.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103292 JEFFREY KLJUN, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS vs.
Layman Ex Rel. Layman v. Alexanderpublic domain
343 F.Supp.2d 483 (2004) Virginia LAYMAN, as General Guardian for Ricky C. LAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Richard T. ALEXANDER, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Sheriff of Haywood County; Jeremy K. Holland, Individually and in his official capacity as an Employee of the Sheriff of Haywood County; Cheryl B. Trull, Individually and in her official capacity as an Employee of the Sheriff of Haywood County; and Redland Insurance Company, Surety for S
Layman v. Alexanderpublic domain
294 F.Supp.2d 784 (2003) Virginia LAYMAN, as General Guardian for Ricky C. Layman, Plaintiff; v. Richard T. ALEXANDER, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Sheriff of Haywood County, Jeffery L. Haynes, Individually and in his official capacity as an Employee of the Sheriff of Haywood County, Jeremy K. Holland, Individually and in his official capacity as an Employee of the Sheriff of Haywood County, Cheryl B. *
Clifford K. v. Paul S.public domain
DAVIS, Justice: The appellant herein and petitioner below, Tina B.,1 appeals from an order entered December 2, 2003, by the Circuit Court of Clay County. By the terms of that order, the circuit court denied Tina B.’s petition for custody of the minor child, Z.B.S., who Tina B. had raised from infancy with her now-deceased partner, finding that Tina B. lacked standing to seek an award of
Arkadi Minassian v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00966-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/29/2015 10:21:46 AM
United States v. Friedlandpublic domain
152 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2001) UNITED STATES of America and the State of Colorado, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants, v. Robert M. FRIEDLAND, Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Counter-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aztec Minerals Corporation, an Ohio corporation; South Mountain Minerals Corporation and Gray Eagle Mining Corporation, a Colorado Corporation, Third-Party Defendants, Counter and Cross-Claimants, and Th
Petrella v. Brownbackpublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. More than six decades ago, the Supreme Court declared school segregation in Topeka, Kansas unconstitutional. Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1964). Since then, Kansas state courts have adjudicated numerous challenges to the state’s school financing system, seeking to effectuate Brown’s ideals and the Kansas Constitution’s mandate that school financing be “suit
Irby v. Statepublic domain
OPINION COCHRAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, JOHNSON, and KEASLER, JJ., joined. In this case we hold that a defendant must show some causal connection or logical relationship between a witness’s probationary status and his potential bias to testify favorably toward the State before the witness may be cross-exam