⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jeffrey Davis Haden”

District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 6× · 156 F. Supp. 2d 599; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13580; 2001 WL 1000722
156 F.Supp.2d 599 (2001) CLUB ASSOCIATION OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert E. WISE, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of the State of West Virginia, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 2:01-0634. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. August 31, 2001. *600 Jeffrey V. Mehalic, Law Offices of Jeff
Clark v. Milampublic domain
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994-03-15 · Published · cited 11× · 847 F. Supp. 424; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3113; 1994 WL 86382
847 F.Supp. 424 (1994) Hanley C. CLARK, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of West Virginia, as Receiver of George Washington Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Arthur W. MILAM, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 2:92-0935. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. March 15, 1994. Joshua I. Barrett, Rudolph L. DiTrapano, Debra L. Ha
District Court, D. South Carolina · 1994-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 158 F.R.D. 581; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15863; 1994 WL 608513
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, District Judge, Sitting by Designation. Pending are Plaintiffs’ motions to reinstate certain discovery orders vacated by the Honorable G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge, prior to his recusal from this matter. Plaintiffs seek discovery of certain documents for which Defendant has asserted attorney-client and/or work product privileges. The documents are in
Clark v. Milampublic domain
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994-02-10 · Published · cited 21× · 847 F. Supp. 409; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1530; 1994 WL 45463
847 F.Supp. 409 (1994) Hanley C. CLARK, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of West Virginia, as Receiver of George Washington Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Arthur W. MILAM, et al., Defendants. No. 2:92-0935. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. February 10, 1994. *410
Clark v. Milampublic domain
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993-07-22 · Published · cited 15× · 830 F. Supp. 316; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11430; 1993 WL 306675
830 F.Supp. 316 (1993) Hanley C. CLARK, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of West Virginia, as Receiver of George Washington Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Arthur W. MILAM, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 2:92-0935. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. July 22, 1993. *317
Clark v. Milampublic domain
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993-12-01 · Published · cited 82× · 152 F.R.D. 66; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17207; 1993 WL 499018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge. Pending are Plaintiffs motion urging this Court to reconsider its August 16, 1993 Order denying as untimely Plaintiffs motion to strike affirmative defenses, and Plaintiffs renewed motion to strike affirmative defenses. Plaintiff requests the Court strike from Defendants’ pleadings certain affirmative defenses Plaintiff claims
Clark v. Milampublic domain
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994-03-25 · Published · cited 14× · 155 F.R.D. 546; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4062; 1994 WL 108396
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge. Pending before this Court are the cross-objections of the parties, Plaintiff, Hanley C. Clark, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of West Virginia, as Receiver of George Washington Life Insurance Company, and Defendant Arthur W. Milam, to the Order of Magistrate Judge Hogg entered February 4, 1994.1 Among other thin
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ark. 67
Cite as 2024 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 18, 2024 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2024 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2024 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2024. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2025-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ark. 59
Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005-10-24 · Published · cited 13× · 174 S.W.3d 15; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1525; 2005 WL 2716468
174 S.W.3d 15 (2005) Linda Sue RUSSELL, Respondent, v. INVENSYS COOKING & REFRIGERATION, Appellant, and Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, Appellant. No. 26774. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. October 24, 2005. *17 Jeffrey W. Laney, Haden, Cowherd & Bullock, L.L.C., Springfield, for a
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2023-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ark. 67
Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
Krider v. Marshallpublic domain
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 118 F. Supp. 2d 704; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16145; 2000 WL 1505294
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge. Pending is Defendant W.K. Marshall’s motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS the motion and DISMISSES the case. I. FINDINGS OF FACT On September 27, 1997 Trooper W.K. Marshall clocked Plaintiff John Russell Krider operating his vehicle at an excessive rate of speed.1 He en
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001-11-02 · Published · cited 1× · 204 F.R.D. 80; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18257; 2001 WL 1379869
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge. Pending is Plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint to delete the existing class action allegations. The sole reason for which Plaintiff putatively seeks dismissal is lack of sufficient time to perform class discovery in aid of certification. Plaintiff, however, has not requested the Court to grant additional time within which to conduct such dis
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-08-22 · Published · cited 57× · 901 F.3d 1245
O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: *1251 We must decide what process the Constitution requires in setting bail for indigent arrestees. I A When this lawsuit began, Maurice Walker was a 54-year-old unemployed man with a mental he
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 925 F.2d 1211
WALLACE, Chief Judge: After dismissing Notrica’s federal claims with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the district court dismissed his pendent state law claims. Notrica argues that the district court abused its discretion by failing to retain jurisdiction over the pendent state claims or, in the alternative, by failing to condition its dismissal of these claims upon a waiver of the applicable statute of limitat
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994-12-01 · Published · cited 22× · 870 F. Supp. 123; 1994 WL 688192
870 F.Supp. 123 (1994) Robert L. MURRAY, Janet L. Murray, Bernie W. Rees, Julie A. Rees, Robert J. Withrow, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Allstate Insurance Company and H & W Realty Company, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 6:94-0817. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division. December 1, 1994.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003-06-23 · Published · cited 28× · 334 F.3d 1018; 2003 WL 21436312
PER CURIAM: Daniel Siebert appeals from the dismissal of his petitions for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although his case reaches us some eleven years after he first sought collateral review of his convictions and sentences of death, the courts have to date determined only that he is subject to procedural bars and therefore have never
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 1, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRANDON BLOUNT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 14-00998 Paula Skahan, Judge No. W2015-00747-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 26, 2016 Defendant, Brandon Blount, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of aggravated burglary a
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1996-05-20 · Published · cited 1× · 926 F. Supp. 170; 43 ERC (BNA) 1030; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7118; 1996 WL 280556
926 F.Supp. 170 (1996) SUN COMPANY, INC. (R & M), a Delaware corporation, and Texaco, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BROWNING-FERRIS, INC., a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants. No. 94-C-820-K. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. May 20, 1996. *171 William D. Perrine, John H. Tucker, Richard Warzy
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20