Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00822-COA MICHELLE BEGNAUD APPELLANT v. JAMIE A. BEGNAUD APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/20/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PRIMEAUX COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CLARKE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR

919 So.2d 392 (2006) John Ellis "Jeb" BUSH, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Ruth D. HOLMES, et al., Appellees. Charles J. Crist, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. Ruth D. Holmes, et al., Appellees. Brenda McShane, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Ruth D. Holmes, et al., Appellees. Nos. SC04-2323 to SC-4-2325. Supreme Court of Florida. January 5, 2006.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR JEFFREY K. ELNICKI, ) No. ED99455 ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 19, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY HOLMES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-02148 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2004-01576-CCA-R3-CD A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant, Larry Holmes

PALMOLIVE BUILDING INVESTORS, LLC, DK PALMOLIVE BUILDING INVESTORS PARTICIPANTS, LLC, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentPalmolive Bldg. Investors, LLC v. Comm'rDocket No. 23444-14Un

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillip A. Holmes and the briefs before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms and adopts the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** Th

06/29/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 3, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RAMEY MICHELLE LONG Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County No. 16-095-2 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

ORDER GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE # 1387) (“Motion”).1 The Court has carefully considered the Motion, response, reply, and the documents attached to them, as well as Plaintiffs’ voluminous evidentiary submissio

Slip Op. 24-85 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNIVERSAL TUBE AND PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, LTD., THL TUBE AND PIPE INDUSTRIES, LLC, and KHK SCAFFOLDING & FORMWORK, LLC, Plaintiffs, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 23-00113 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and WHEATLAND TUBE COMPANY, Defendant-Interv

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Wachovia Bank, N.A.’s (‘Wachovia”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay in Favor, of Arbitration (DE # 1384), filed ■ April 29, 2011. The Court is fully briefed in the m

ACCEPTED 03-14-00529-CV 3993295 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN,

LEVAL, Circuit Judge. The defendants, MasterCard International, Inc. (“MasterCard”), Visa U.S.A., Inc. (“Visa U.S.A.”), and Visa International, Inc. (“Visa International”), appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Barbara S. Jones, /.), entered after a non-jury trial, finding that the defendants violated Section 1 of the S

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT UNION BANK’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Union Bank’s Motion to Dismiss (DE # 1355), filed April 20, 2011. Therein, Defendant seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (DE # 1317), claiming both that 1) Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Natio

ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS 0. RICE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the following motions: Defendant Cow Palace, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 190); Defendants The Dolsen Companies’ and Three D Properties’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 191); Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Scott Stephen (ECF No. 193); Defendant Cow Palace, LLC’s Da

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–1218 Filed March 30, 2018 RHONDA BANWART, Appellant, vs. 50TH STREET SPORTS, L.L.C. d/b/a DRAUGHT HOUSE 50, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell, Judge. An injured party seeks further review of a court of appeals decision affirming an adverse decision on a

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW CLAIM William Alsup, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In this action asserting claims for trade secret misappropriation, patent infringement, and unfair competition, defendants *1061move to dismiss the latter as superseded by California’s Uniform Trade Secrets

ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Corrected: August 3, 2005 04-7117, -7128 DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS, Petitioner, and THE AMERICAN LEGION and THE NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRA

EBEL, Circuit Judge. In this litigation, Appellants, plaintiffs below, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging the statutory scheme by which the state of Kansas funds its public schools. The district court dismissed their suit for lack of standing. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we conclude that the Appellants have standing because their alleged injury — unequal treatment by the state— would

OMNIBUS ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Preemption and Further Reconsideration (DE # 1484), filed May 17, 2011.1 Defendants move for reconsideration of the Court’s earlier Omnibus Order Denying Dism