⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Jeffrey Allan Lockwood and Ellen Elizabeth Lockwood”

District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992-12-21 · Published · cited 4× · 829 F. Supp. 1078; 1992 WL 437429
829 F.Supp. 1078 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ARROWHEAD REFINING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ARROWHEAD REFINING COMPANY, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Rodney A. ANDERSON, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 5-89-0202. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division. December 21, 1992.
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 829 F. Supp. 1078; 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20115; 35 ERC (BNA) 2065; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20841
ORDER MAGNUSON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ and third-party plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge McNulty’s Report and Recommendation dated November 10, 1992 granting third party defendant Mobil’s motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to statute, the court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Local Rule 72.1(c). Bas