Cases

M F Bank ("M F") petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the Jefferson Circuit Court to vacate its order setting aside a previous order in which it had granted M F's motion to strike and/or quash subpoenas issued by the respondent, First American Title Insurance Company ("First American"), to depose certain individuals. We deny the petition. I. Facts and Procedural History On December 19, 2006, a plat for a subdivision referred to as Ol

OPINION & ORDER ROLL, District Judge. The Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (Director) seeks summary judgment in this action arising from a complaint filed by First American Federal Bank (First American) challenging the Director’s appointment of a receiver for First American. Following oral argument and a separate evidentiary hearing, the Court has under advisement the Defe

STUART, Justice. In case no. 1111525, M & F Bank (“M & F”) appeals the summary judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court in favor of First American Title Insurance Company (“FATIC”) on negligence, breach-of-contract, and bad-faith-failure-to-pay claims M & F asserted against FATIC related to a title-insurance policy (“the title policy”) FATIC issued M & F in connection with a mortgage loan made by M &am;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TOMMIE JEFFERSON, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 21-1489 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 18 : LLOYD J.

822 F.Supp.2d 678 (2011) TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09CV-661-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. September 27, 2011. *680 Lea Pauley Goff, Lee A. Webb, Matthew R. Lindblom, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Louisvill

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-1259 ___________ Duane Friez, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District

323 S.W.3d 146 (2010) JEFFERSON STATE BANK, Petitioner, v. Christa C. LENK, Administratrix of the Estate of Mickey Carl Marcus, Respondent. No. 09-0269. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 16, 2010. Decided August 27, 2010. *147 Ellen B. Mitchell, Cox Smith Matthews, David B. West, Cox & Smith Incorporate

MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring specially). I concur with the decision of the Court to deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. I write specially to explain my reasons for denying the petition: (1) the petitioners’ delay in moving to strike the demand for a jury trial and (2) the unconstitutionality of predispute contractual jury waivers as violating the right to a jury trial.

SIM LAKE, UNITED DISTRICT JUDGE On March 9, 2018, defendants, Dezra Jefferson and Vincent Jefferson, citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443, 1446, and 1447(b), removed this action from the County Court of Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, where it was pending under Cause No. 1094386.1 On Apri

696 S.E.2d 824 (2010) William P. MILLER, as Receiver for Rose Furniture Company, Plaintiff, v. FIRST BANK and E.F. Merrell Company, L.L.C., Defendants. First Bank, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Robert L. Kester, William V. Kester, Jr. and Edgar F. Merrell, Third-Party Defendants. No. COA09-607. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 3, 2010.

Memorandum Opinion on Professional Fees and Expenses, the Indenture’s Operating Expenses, and 11 U.S.C. § 928(b)’s “Necessary Operating Expenses ” THOMAS B. BENNETT, Chief Judge. I. Words, Phrases, And Meanings Be They Plain or Not Some of what the law is about is words and their usage. From the view of one version of objectivity, language is objective in the sense that i

USCA11 Case: 23-11132 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 02/25/2025 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11132 ____________________ MICHAEL CHAPMAN,

Case: 23-30243 Document: 00516871910 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

278 B.R. 749 (2002) In re Jerry ARTURO RODRIGUEZ and Maria Teresa Rodriguez, Debtors. Maria Teresa Rodriguez and Jerry Arturo Rodriguez, Plaintiffs, v. First American Bank, S.S.B. and JLM Financial I, Ltd., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-11177-RLJ-13. Adversary No. 02-1001. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division. May 29, 2002.

163 S.W.3d 485 (2005) LeeAnna JEFFERSON, Appellant, v. AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., d/b/a The Mortgage Source, et al., Respondent. No. ED 84471. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. May 3, 2005. *486 Scott Donald Mosier, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. *487 Robert

930 S.W.2d 546 (1996) Louis GLAZER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. September 16, 1996. Petition for Rehearing Denied October 28, 1996. *547 Henry L. Klein, Apperson, Crump, Duzane & Maxwell, Memphis, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Gary L.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARSELLES JEFFERSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-1692 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP., et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Marselles

MOORE, Judge. Lynn E. Thomas d/b/a Anchor Comms (“Thomas”) appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court (“the trial *810court”) in favor of American Express Bank, FSB (“American Express”). We reverse. Background American Express sued Thomas on October 6, 2011, asserting three counts of breach of a written cont

616 So.2d 202 (1993) Donald LITTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JEFFERSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-CA-937. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. March 17, 1993. Winthrop G. Gardner, Law Offices of Winthrop G. Gardner, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant. Robert A. Mathis, Newman, Mathis, Brady, Wakefield & Spedale, P.C., Meta

On Application for Rehearing THOMAS, Judge. The opinion of January 4, 2013, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. Steven R. Walker and Lawanda Walker appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court entering a summary judgment in favor of North American Savings Bank (“the Bank”) on the Bank’s ejectment action and disallowing the Walkers’ counterclaims.