Cases

Renee Freeman appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court ("the trial court") in favor of her son, Brandon Freeman, and his wife, Kimberly Freeman, on Renee's claim of negligence. We affirm. Facts and Procedural History On June 30, 2009, Renee filed a complaint in the trial court against Brandon and Kimberly, asserting a claim of negligence.1 In her complaint, Renee asserted

ORDER Per curiam: Norman Freeman was convicted of murder in the second degree following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal in State v. Freeman, 359 S.W.3d 498 (Mo.App.W.D.2012). Freeman now appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to th

ORDER PER CURIAM. Thomas Freeman appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-*490conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parti

Lisa White Hardwick, Judge Laurie Freeman and Martin Reid (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the judgment in favor of Hawthorn Bank (“Hawthorn”) on their class action petition alleging that Hawthorn’s automated debit card overdraft program violates Missouri’s usury law. Appellants contend the circuit court erred in holding that Hawthorn’s debit card overdraft fee is a statutorily-permitted service charge imposed on a d

ORDER PER CURIAM: Harlan Freeman appeals his convictions of Count 1, second-degree assault, Count 2, armed criminal action (relating to Count 1), and Count 3, third-degree domestic assault following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. On appeal, Freeman claims that the trial court: (1) plainly erred by not sua sponte declaring a mistrial or instructing the jury to disregard inadm

359 S.W.3d 498 (2012) STATE OF Missouri, Respondent, v. Norman R. FREEMAN, Appellant. No. WD 72216. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 17, 2012. Susan E. Summers, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang and John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before: ALOK AHUJA, P.J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON and JAMES E. WE

ORDER PER CURIAM. The movant, Tabari Freeman, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting fort

ORDER PER CURIAM. Charles Jefferson appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify his judgment of dissolution of marriage and *72the trial court’s grant of the Family Support Division’s motion to modify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would b

353 S.W.3d 61 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thomas FREEMAN, Defendant/Appellant. No. ED 95331. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. September 13, 2011. Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 27, 2011. Application for Transfer Denied December 20, 2011. Chris Koster, Attorne

ORDER PER CURIAM. Maurice Freeman appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Department of Corrections (“DOC”) in his declaratory judgment action. Freeman contends the court erred in determining that he is not entitled to credit for time he spent in federal custody prior to the commencement of his current prison sentence on a State court conviction. For reasons explaine

362 S.W.3d 488 (2012) Mitchel FREEMAN, Appellant, v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. ED 97247. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. March 20, 2012. Evan J. Beatty, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Caroline Marie Bean, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before:

257 S.W.3d 186 (2008) Uel Joe FREEMAN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent. No. 28751. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. July 2, 2008. *187 Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Jefferson City, for R

212 S.W.3d 173 (2007) STATE of Missouri, Respondent v. Uel Joe FREEMAN, Appellant. No. 27750. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. January 26, 2007. *174 Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Victor J. Melenbrink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respon

269 S.W.3d 422 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Samuel A. FREEMAN, Appellant. No. SC 89119. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. October 28, 2008. Rehearing Denied December 16, 2008. *423 Stephen E. Walsh, Daniel T. Moore, John M. Albright, Moore, Walsh & Albright, LLP, Poplar Bluff, MO, for Appellant.

178 S.W.3d 548 (2005) Carl E. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. WD 64144. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 19, 2005. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied October 4, 2005. Application for Transfer Denied December 20, 2005. Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Deborah D

189 S.W.3d 605 (2006) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cedric FREEMAN, Appellant. No. WD 64305. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. February 21, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied May 2, 2006. As Modified May 2, 2006. *606 Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.</

ORDER PER CURIAM. Christopher Freeman (“movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his amended motion because his guilty plea was not voluntarily made in *493th

128 S.W.3d 613 (2004) Gary W. FREEMAN, Claimant/Appellant, v. PLAZA MOTORS COMPANY and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. No. ED 83900. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. February 24, 2004. Gary W. Freeman, Creve Coeur, pro se. Cynthia Ann Quetsch, Jefferson City, for respondent. Plaza Motor Company, Creve Coeur, pro

276 S.W.3d 388 (2009) Kenneth FREEMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. GARY GLASS & MIRROR, L.L.C., Employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent. No. SD 29104. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. February 2, 2009. *389 Richard D. Bender, Springfield, MO, for Appellant. Rachel M. Lewis, J

ORDER PER CURIAM. Carl Freeman appeals his jury conviction and sentence for voluntary manslaughter, Section 565.023 R.S.Mo.2000, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. He contends the circuit court erred in failing to grant a mistrial after the prosecutor made improper closing arguments. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandu