Cases

632 S.E.2d 429 (2006) 279 Ga. App. 652 R.O.C. et al. v. ESTATE OF BRYANT et al. No. A06A1096. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 7, 2006. *430 Thomas M. Strickland, Athens, for appellants. Margaret N. Dyal, Lavonia, for appellees. BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge. Jeannine Christian, as next

472 N.W.2d 157 (1991) Randall PATTON, French Patton, Ramanda Patton, and Amanda Patton, minor children of Abigail Patton, their mother and natural guardian, and Abigail Patton, individually, and Don Westfall, individually and for the estate of Judith Westfall, Plaintiffs, v. Wesley YARRINGTON, et. al., Defendants. Bernice RUFF, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Joyce Ruff, Homer Ruff, James Christopher Ruff, Bryant Ruff, Kevin Ruff, Dwayne Ru

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, brings this appeal from the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Union County, Ohio, granting defendant-appellee John W. Engle's motion to dismiss criminal charges filed against him. {¶ 2} Following an investigation, officers of the Union County Sheriffs Office and the Marysville Police Department conducted a "sting" operation with the assistance of a confidential informant ("C

534 F.Supp.2d 1248 (2007) In re FARO TECHNOLOGIES SECURITIES LITIGATION. Lead Case No. 6:05-cv-1810-Orl-22DAB. Member Cases Nos. 6:06-cv-8-Orl-22DAB, 6:06-cv-16-Or1-22DAB, 6:06-cv-57-Or1-22DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 18, 2007. *1249 *1250

67 P.3d 412 (2003) 187 Or. App. 412 Gimmie Rebecca VANCE, Thomas Wells, Jeannine Wells, and Roxanna Seay, Respondents, v. Richard FORD and Kristin Ford, Appellants. 0012-12355; A116812. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2002. Decided April 24, 2003. *413 Jacob T

758 N.W.2d 594 (2008) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Adolphus BROWN, Appellant. No. A07-0599. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 16, 2008. *596 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Elizabeth R. Johnston, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

15 P.3d 502 (2000) 2000 OK 96 Eddie FOWLER and Karen Fowler, individually and as husband and wife, Dennis Hawkins and Arlene Hawkins, individually and as husband and wife, Lee Smith and Marjorie Smith, individually and as husband and wife, and Orah Fowler, individually, Appellees, v. LINCOLN COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Appellant. No. 89,115. Supreme Court of Oklahoma.<

Filed 8/30/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT NATHANIEL DIMAGGIO, H051516 (Monterey County Petitioner, Super. Ct. No. 22CR004734) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MONTEREY COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE,

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. In this appeal four groups of prospective intervenors-the Arnett I, Arnett II, Charter Land Co. LLC, and Wyborny appellants-challenge the district court's 1 denials of their motions to intervene in a class action lawsuit by named plaintiff Connie Jean Smith against SEECO, Inc.,

Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys

161 F.Supp.2d 208 (2001) HORIZON MILLS CORP., Plaintiff, v. QVC, INC., Defendant. No. 00 Civ. 2278(AGS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 30, 2001. *209 Stephen J. Quigley, Michael Aschen, Jeffrey A. Schwab, Abelman, Frayne & Schwab, Harlan M. Lazarus, Lazarus & Lazarus, P.C., New York City, for Plaintif

120 F.Supp.2d 58 (2000) In re VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: Cargill, Inc., et al. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., et al. NBTY, et al. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd., et al. Perrigo Co., et al. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., et al. Natural Alternatives Internatl. Inc., et al. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., et al. Leiner Health Products, Inc. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., et al.

138 F.Supp.2d 402 (2001) Paul JAMES, Plaintiff, v. Arthur DEGRANDIS, Mark J. DeGrandis, and Christopher Conklin, Defendants. No. 97-CV-664C. United States District Court, W.D. New York. March 30, 2001. *403 *404 *405 Jaeckle, Fleischmann & Mugel, LLP (R

MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Bronnimann Motions THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court are defendant Roland Bronnimann’s (“Bronnimann”) Motion to Dismiss the Cargill complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and the Car-gill plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Roland *64Bronnimann’s testimony.1 U

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Takeda to Produce Documents, Answer Interrogatories, and Produce Witnesses THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge. Before the Court are the objections pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 53 of defendants Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (“TCI”) and Takeda Vitamin and Food U.S.A., Inc. (“TVFU”) (collectively, “Takeda”) to the Jun