Cases

ORDER PER CURIAM. The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

ORDER PER CURIAM. The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellant Diego Ortiz claims that he unknowingly got caught up in a drug deal when he agreed to drive an acquaintance around town for a few hours. He was indicted along with his passenger and a third individual, but was tried alone after the other two entered pleas. A jury found Ortiz guilty on one count of conspiracy and one count of possession, both w

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00626-CV Lucia Ortiz, Appellant v. OW Clear Creek, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 21CCV91456, THE HONORABLE JEANNE PARKER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant’s brie

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 JEANN B. ORTIZ SALGADO Apelación Procedente del Apelado Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Ponce

NUMBER 13-20-00193-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DR. KELLY ISBELL, Appellant, v. JEANNE RUSSELL, MISSION STREET CONSULTING LLC, AND KATE ROGERS, Appellees.

547 F.Supp. 550 (1982) Carmen R. ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Jeanne Lyons, Defendants. No. Civ. S-81-298 LKK. United States District Court, E. D. California. September 9, 1982. *551 Eldora A. Gardner, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants. M. Armando Enriquez, Carmichael, Cal., for plaintiff. ORDER<

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed July 14, 2009 Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed July 14, 2009. In The

Hanlon, J. After a jury trial, the defendants, Markeese Mitchell, Terrance Pabon, and Pedro Ortiz were convicted of murder in the second degree in connection with the stabbing death of Terrance Jacobs. Paul Goode also was indicted, tried with the defendants, and convicted of murder in the second degree. Goode’s direct appeal originally was consolidated with the others; however, by mot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Paula Jeanne Martel v. Civil No. 20-cv-1135-JD Opinion No. 2021 DNH 098 Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration O R D E R Paula Jeanne Martel moves, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), to reverse the decision of the Commissioner that denied her application f

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellants Paul A. DeCologero (“Paul A.”), Paul J. DeCologero (“Paul J.”), and John P. DeCologero, Jr. (“John Jr.”) were members of a Boston-based criminal organization known as the “DeCologero crew.” In 2006, all three were convicted of violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and a number of related crimes. Appellants

654 F.3d 1377 (2011) Carmen RIVERA (Substituted for Roberto V. Ortiz), Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. No. 2010-7097. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 19, 2011. Omar A. Khan, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for claimant-appellant. Of counsel

I respectfully dissent for the reasons given in my dissenting opinions in Commerce Independent School District v. TexasEducation Agency, 859 S.W.2d 627, 629 (Tex.App. — *Page 553 Austin 1993, writ dism'd), Nueces Canyon ConsolidatedIndependent School District v. Central Education Agency,900 S.W.2d 417, 418-19 (Tex.App. — Austin no writ h.), an

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellants Daniel Appolon (“Daniel”), Ernst Appolon (“Ernst”), Latoya Haltiwanger, J. Daniel Lindley, and Eric L. Levine were players in the Boston real estate market. Along with six coconspirators, appellants devised and executed a mortgage fraud scheme which netted them illegal profits of nearly $2 million between May 2005 and June 2006. The scheme itself w

Restani, Judge: Columbia Forest Products, Commonwealth Plywood Inc., States Industries, Inc., and Timber Products Company (collectively, "plaintiffs") seek to stay proceedings in this action pending the final determination by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") in the anti-circumvention inquiry regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty ("AD/CVD") orders on certain hardwood

Katzmann, Judge: This case involves issues of scope interpretation and notice in an anticircumvention investigation. Tai-Ao Aluminum Company ("Tai-Ao") and Regal Ideas, Inc. ("Regal") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") are importers of heat-treated 5050-grade aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China ("PRC"). The United States Department of Commerce ("Commerce") had issued ant

Taranto, Circuit Judge. In 2011, acting under 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671 , 1673, and related provisions, the United States Department of Commerce issued antidumping and countervailing duty orders covering aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of Chin

PER CURIAM. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s petition to disestablish paternity. He proved by un-rebutted scientific evidence that he was not the biological father of the two children born during his marriage to the ap-pellee. Consequently, he has no enforceable legal obligation to make child support payments to the appellee. See Daniel v. Daniel, 695 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1997). We share t

196 So.2d 186 (1967) Ida Pioanetti ORTIZ, Appellant, v. Nicholas NICOLAIDES and Sofia Nicolaides, His Wife, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellees. Nos. 66-419, 66-654. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District. March 7, 1967. Dean, Adams, George & Wood, and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellant. Manners & Amoon, Jerry V

OPINION AND ORDER Kelly, Judge: This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Mot. [TRO] and Mem. Supp. PL’s Mot, App. [TRO], Nov. 6, 2017, EOF No. 6 (“PI. TRO”). Plaintiffs Valeo North America, Inc., Mahle Behr Dayton, L.L.C., Mahle Behr Charl