Cases

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Defendant Stephen Martin Beddow (“defendant” or “Beddow”) appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, three counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(B), 1956(a)(2)(B) and 1957, and one count of income tax evasion in violation o

450 Mich. 349 (1995) PEOPLE v. PETERSON PEOPLE v. SMITH Docket Nos. 98941, 99981, (Calendar Nos. 12-13). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued April 5, 1995. Decided August 22, 1995. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, Joseph P. Kwiatkowski, Prosecuting Attorney, and J. Ronald Kaplan

710 F.Supp. 74 (1989) FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Burk DENNIS, Gilbert Fuentes, Terry Foster, Fred Crowley and Jeanice Drury Crowley, Ralph E. Clure, Mark Silver, Marvin Perlman, Richard Foringer, Larry Maurer, Francis A. Desarro, Jon Wallin, Gerald Fresonke, Defendants. Nos. 87 Civ. 2959 (RWS) to 87 Civ. 2968 (RWS), 87 Civ. 3005 (RWS) and 87 Civ. 3006 (RWS). United States District C

680 F.Supp. 579 (1988) FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Burk DENNIS, Defendant. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Gilbert FUENTES, Defendant. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Terry FOSTER, Defendant. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Fred CROWLEY and Jeanice Drury Crowley, Defendants. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Ralph E. CLURE,

690 F.Supp. 221 (1988) FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Burk DENNIS, Defendant. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Gilbert FUENTES, Defendant. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Terry FOSTER, Defendant. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Fred CROWLEY and Jeanice Drury Crowley, Defendants. FIRST CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Ralph E. CLURE,

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff First City Federal Savings Bank (“First City” or “the Bank”) has moved for sanctions under Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P., against David H. Tedder (“Tedder”), counsel for the defendant-investors. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted and sanctions in the sum of $4,000 will be granted. Prior Proceedings This

HAYES, Chief Judge: The appellants unsuccessfully sought relief in Franklin Circuit Court from the denial by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of a hearing concerning the denial and issuance of retail package liquor licenses in Floyd County. The appellants constitute two classes — those who applied unsuccessfully for licenses and those who never applied for a license but claim to be citizens concerned with the procedure uti

564 N.W.2d 903 (1997) 222 Mich. App. 160 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert Yves WYBRECHT, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 185428. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted December 4, 1996, at Detroit. Decided March 7, 1997, at 9:05 a.m. Released for Publication May 22, 1997.

OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Kevin King, a/k/a Kevin Pease (“Petitioner”), appeals the district court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner claims that the district court erred in holding that the state court’s (1) refusal to bar testimony of a witness who failed a polygraph exam;

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge. This case is currently before the Court on two motions directed at ARINC, Incorporated’s (“ARINC”) cross-claim and third-party complaint. The first is the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) motion to dismiss Count I (Breach of Contract and Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) and Count III (Contractual Indemnification) of AR

808 F.Supp.2d 154 (2011) In the Matter of the FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009. LEAD CASE: Jenkins v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. This Document Relates To: All Cases Arinc, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Third-Party Defendant. Case No. 10-mc-0314 (RBW). United States District Co

186 Mich. App. 701 (1991) 464 N.W.2d 919 PEOPLE v. RITTER Docket No. 116685. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided January 8, 1991, at 9:30 A.M. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Gay Secor Hardy, Solicitor General, Norman W. Donker, Prosecuting Attorney, and John K. Bunce, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for th

200 Cal.App.3d 244 (1988) 245 Cal. Rptr. 870 In re LAMONT R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAMONT R., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. A037522. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. April 14, 1988. *245 COUNSEL

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts C and D of the Discussion. *Page 128 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 129 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEAD

GEORGE, J., Dissenting. Government Code section 845.8, subdivision (b) (section 845.8), provides that a public entity is immune from liability for injuries caused by a person resisting arrest or detention.1 The majority holds that this statute “does not provide immunity to public entities for liability that is predicated on Vehicle Code section 17001,” wh

191 Cal.App.3d 1566 (1987) 237 Cal. Rptr. 137 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VICTOR ZAVALA RODRIGUEZ, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. F006757. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. May 21, 1987. *1567 COUNSEL Jeff Reich, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant

*1163Opinion RACANELLI, P. J.- SUMMARY By these several petitions consolidated for decision, petitioners Christopher Falco, Roy E. Smith, Michael Punzal and Andrea Bowen challenge sentences imposed on them on the grounds that such sentences exceeded the terms of their plea bargains, contravened the requirements of Penal Code sectio

Opinion BEST, J. Defendant was convicted by plea of violating Health and Safety Code section 11350, possession of heroin. He was ultimately sentenced to the upper term of three years, execution of which term was suspended, and was granted probation for a period of five years on condition, among others, that he serve one year in the county jail.

36 Cal.3d 134 (1984) 679 P.2d 1033 202 Cal. Rptr. 92 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARTIN EDWARD MARSH, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. Crim. 22944. Supreme Court of California. May 10, 1984. *136 COUNSEL Quin Denvir, State Public Defender, under appointment by

344 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2004) Warren Lee JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Millicent WARREN, Respondent, No. CIV. 03-40154. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 15, 2004. *1085 Earl R. Spuhler, Rogers City, MI, for Warren Johnson, Petitioner. Debra M. Gagliardi, Michigan Department of Attorney General