Cases

247 F.Supp.2d 337 (2003) PRIMAX RECOVERIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. Lisa CAREY, Jerry's Accommodations, Kline & Sheldon, Richard A. Sheldon, Edward Lindberg, and Jean M. Lindberg, Defendants. No. 00 Civ. 8337(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 23, 2002. *339 Kenneth A. Beck, Beck & Beck, LLC, Str

Case: 25-10534 Document: 195 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 2, 2025

Jenkins, Justice: *906 Petitioner Robert Smith ("Mr. Smith") herein appeals the November 17, 2017 order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County denying his motion for a new trial and renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law. 1 M

402 F.Supp.2d 871 (2005) Gaynell GRIER, et al., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. M.D. GOETZ, Jr., Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration, et al., Defendants, and Tennessee Association of Health Maintenance Organizations, et al., Defendants-Intervenors, Sanford Bloch, Mark Levine, Tim Jones, and William Duncan, and Mary Kathryn Duncan, by their next friend, Robert Duncan, Pla

*847MEMORANDUM OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR TRIBUNE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND DENYING CLARIFICATION MOTION2 KEVIN J. CAREY, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court for consideration is the Fourth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization for Tribune Company an

Curto v Kahn Prop. Owner, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 01290) Curto v Kahn Prop. Owner, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 01290 Decided on March 13, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

JUSTICE NELSON specially concurs. ¶48 I concur in our Opinion. However, as mentioned briefly at ¶¶ 21, 27 and 36 of our Opinion and at ¶ 47 of Justice Leaphart’s concurrence, there is an additional rationale supporting our decision in this case-i.e., whether Kloss effectively waived her rights to a trial by jury and to access to the courts1

421 F.Supp.2d 1061 (2006) Gaynell GRIER, et al., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, and Sanford Bloch, et al., and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. M.D. GOETZ, Jr., Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration, et al., Defendants, and Tennessee Association of Health Maintenance Organizations, et al., Defendants-Intervenors. No. 3:79-3107.<

Filed 5/5/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S049626 v. ) ) Santa Clara County STEPHEN EDWARD HAJEK ) Super. Ct. No. 148113 AND LOI TAN VO, )

JUSTICE BOLICK, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Arizona’s Constitution and laws forbid bail for defendants accused of sexual conduct with a minor under age fifteen when the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant committed the crime. Because that prohibition is not narrowly focused to protect public safety, we hold that it violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process guarantee.

DREW, J. | Cedric Lynn Harvey was convicted of simple burglary, in violation of La. R.S. 14:62. He was sentenced to 16 years at hard labor as a third-felony habitual offender. We affirm the conviction. We amend the sentence to require that it be served without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence, as per statute. FACTS Shreveport Police Officer Tina Howes testified:

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a group of African American employees and former employees (plaintiffs), appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal of their race discrimination ease against their employer, AG. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (defendant), with prejudice and from the denial of their motion for class cert

DREW, J. Charles Mays, Jr., was charged with armed robbery, La. R.S. 14:64. After a jury found him guilty as charged, he filed a motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal, which was denied. The defendant was adjudicated a second-felony habitual offender and sentenced to the minimum legal sentence, 49 ½ years at hard labor without benefits, to be served concurrently with any other sentence. No mo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TANGLE, INC., No. 23-3707 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:23-cv-01196- JSW v. OPINION ARITZIA, INC.; ARITZIA LP; UNITED ST

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Kenegson v. Gerard, Fla.1964, 164 So.2d 204; F. E. C. R. Co. v. McKinney, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 99, cert. denied, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 176.

Leary, J. After a bench trial in this motor vehicle tort action, the defendant/ appellants, Reuben Tondreau (Tondreau), and Veras, Inc. (Veras), raise two issues on appeal: (1) “[wjhether the Trial Court abused its discretion when it admitted medical records into evidence that were never produced, certified or subpoenaed”; and (2) “[wjhether the Trial Court improperly calculated interest and entered erroneous judgment.”

Filed 7/23/14 Unmodified opinion attached IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S049626 v. ) ) Santa Clara County STEPHEN EDWARD HAJEK ) Super. Ct. No. 148113 AN

528 Pa. 491 (1991) 598 A.2d 1283 Ivan S. SNYDER, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 18, 1991. Decided November 6, 1991. *492 Edward P. Carey, Jean E. Graybill, Asst. Counsels, John A. Kane, Chief Counsel, Harrisb

25 A.3d 632 (2011) 302 Conn. 263 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ex rel. Fanetta ARNOLD et al. v. Jean M. FORVIL et al. No. 18500. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 16, 2011. Decided August 30, 2011. *636 Edward F. Kunin, for the appellants (defendants). Robin S.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV