Cases

*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms with some modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. The Full Commission has further considered and determined the Plaintiff's request for attorney fees un

400 S.E.2d 268 (1990) Antonia Jeane GARDNER v. Wayne B. GARDNER. No. 19616. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. December 6, 1990. *270 Roger D. Curry, McLaughlin and Curry, Fairmont, for Antonia Jeane Gardner. Robert C. Gorey, Jr., Clagett & Gorey, Fairmont, for Wayne B. Gardner.

PER CURIAM. Appellant, Mary Jean Gardner, personal representative of the estate of her late husband, Gregory Gardner, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division (Brooks, J.), after a jury trial in favor of appellee, the Southern Railway Company. Appellant raises two issues on a

978 S.W.2d 624 (1998) In re GARDNER ZEMKE COMPANY No. 08-97-00471-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. May 21, 1998. *625 Bruce Yetter, El Paso, for relator. Philip Martinez, pro se. Edurado Miranda, Ray, McChristian, & Jeans, P.C., El Paso, for R.E.Thomason Gen. Hosp. Before BARAJAS, C.J., and McCLURE, and CH

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1846 MICHEL ST. JEAN, Petitioner, Appellant, v. RAYMOND MARCHILLI, Superintendent, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

November 5 2014 DA 14-0276 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 291N IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF L.D.L., An Incapacitated Person. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Second Judicial District, In and For the County of Silver Bow, Cause No. DG-02-16 Hono

PER CURIAM: This ease is part of the second wave of “straddle” cases to come before the federal courts. In the first wave, purchasers of commodity straddles challenged the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s denial of loss deductions taken pursuant to closing out the loss legs of their straddles. The Tax Court, in the landmark case of Glass v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1087 (1986), determined that the straddles were sham

In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ══════════ No. PD-0677-22 ══════════ LARRY JEAN HART, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review From the Fifth Court of Appeals

Birdsong, Judge. Larry Sterling Gardner, alias Monorail Sterling, was convicted of armed robbery. On appeal, he urges that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Held: The evidence showed that at about 11:00 p.m. on November 27, 1981, the manager and the security guard of a convenience store/gas station on Bankhead Highway in Atlanta were robbed at g

In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ══════════ No. PD-0677-22 ══════════ LARRY JEAN HART, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review From the Fifth Court of Appeals

954 F.2d 836 69 A.F.T.R.2d 92-707, 92-1 USTC P 50,079 Hilary P. GARDNER; Judith C. Gardner; Reed Clark; AudreyClark; Dominick A. Cademartori; Jean E. Cademartori;Ralph G. Kazi; Jean Kazi; Charles H. Falk; Joan Falk;Arturo Sterling; Lydia Sterling; Daniel Gutman; andJudith Gutman, Petitioners-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,Terence J. Horn and Jean Horn, Petitioners-Appellants,v.COMMISS

PD-1407-15 No. PD-___________ IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS HERBERT GARDNER Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee __________________________________________________ FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DIST

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0677-22 LARRY JEAN HART, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTY MCCLURE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which HERVEY, RICHARDSON, NEWELL, and WALKER, JJ., j

PD-1407-15 PD-1407-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS No. PD-___________ Transmitted 11/2/2015 4:55:35 PM Accepted 11/3/2015 2:17:27 PM

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0677-22 LARRY JEAN HART, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTY MCCLURE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which HERVEY, RICHARDSON, NEWELL, and WALKER, JJ., j

OPINION Martha Hill Jamison, Justice Appellant, Herbert Garfield Gardner, appeals from his conviction for capital murder. A jury found appellant guilty, and the trial court sentenced him to mandatory life in prison. While appellant concedes that he intentionally murdered the complainant, he contends in two issues that the evidence was insufficient to pro

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. WILKINS, Circuit Judge: The question before the Court is whether and to what extent a district court must explain its decision to deny a motion to terminate supervised release. We conclude that while a district court is required to consider certain factors before granting or denying a motion to ter

*1177 REID, Senior Judge: These appeals arise from the indictment of appellant, Eric Gardner, on several felony charges related to the shooting death of cab driver Andrew Kamara .on November 12, 2004. 1 A jury convicted Mr. Gardner of some of

DALE R. CATHELL (Retired, specially assigned) J. The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“AGC”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action in which it asserted that Paul Winston Gardner, II, Respondent, violated certain of the Maryland Lawyer’s Rules of Professional Conduct in respect to several client *285matters.

NO. 12-21-00217-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS GARRY L. BEARD, LARRY E. BEARD § APPEAL FROM THE AND STANLEY BEARD, APPELLANTS § COUNTY COURT AT LAW V. JEANNE BEARD,