Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Jayesh K Shah”
Jayesh K. Shah v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Fifteen years after his 1990 conviction for aggravated criminal sexual abuse, Jayesh Shah was ordered removed to India. He did not seek judicial review of that order but did file a motion to reconsider and petition for review of its denial. He contended that he should have been granted a waiver of removal under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nation
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge. On August 15, 2011, plaintiff Armada (Singapore) PTE Limited (“Armada”) and AMCOL International Corporation, Volclay International Corporation and American Colloid Company (the “AM-COL Garnishees”) presented evidence1 *881on the following two issu
Trilegiant Corp. v. Sitel Corp.public domain
*430 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. Trilegiant Corporation (“Trilegiant”) brings this contract action against Sitel Corporation (“Sitel”), alleging that Sitel’s failure to maintain audio recordings of customer service calls it conducted on Trilegiant’s behalf violated the terms of their contract. S
704 F.Supp.2d 378 (2010) In re MERRILL LYNCH AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To No. 08 Civ. 3037 (LAP). No. 09 MD 2030 (LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2010. *381 Aaron Michael Sheanin, Christina H.C. Sharp, Daniel Charles Girard, Jonathan K. Levine, A.J. De Bartolomeo, Girard Gi
Shum v. Intel Corp.public domain
ORDER RE: TAXATION OF COSTS D. LOWELL JENSEN, District Judge. On September 25, 2009, the Court heard arguments on Plaintiffs Motion Challenging Clerk’s Taxation of the Parties’ Bills of Costs. Paul Kirsch appeared on behalf of the plaintiff; Steve Taylor appeared for the defendants. Having considered the arguments of counsel, the papers submitted as well as any supplements thereto, the applicable law,
In Re Mortgages Ltd.public domain
444 B.R. 585 (2011) In re MORTGAGES LTD., Debtor. Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc. d/b/a summit builders, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff, v. Central and Monroe, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; et al., Defendants. Summers Group, Inc. d/b/a Rexel Phoenix Electric, a corporation, Cross-Claimant/Counter-Claimant, v. Central and Monroe, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; Cross-Defendants; and Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc
MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MORTGAGES LTD. RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue here is whether various mechanics’ lien claimants, who claim priority dating from the commencement of construction in November 2006, have priority over a construction deed of trust that was recorded in May of 2007. Among other defenses, the construction lender asserts the doctri