⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jay V. Drewry”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 564 So. 2d 1125; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576; 1990 WL 88073
BASKIN, Judge. Modern Health Care Services, Inc. [MHCS] appeals a final judgment. We reverse. The facts of this case are set out sufficiently in our previous opinion, Modern Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Drewry, 526 So.2d 979 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which we reversed a final summary judgment entered against MHCS. Upon remand, the parties stipulated to a trial based on their written memoranda. Aft
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 526 So. 2d 979; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1306; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2234; 1988 WL 53041
BASKIN, Judge. Appellees David E. Drewry and Shirley Drewry brought a malpractice action against Modem Health Care Services, Inc., [the hospital] and the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund [the Fund]. When that matter was settled, the settlement agreement acknowledged that the hospital had not collected funds owed on its bill for services. In an effort to collect its unpaid bill, the hospital sued the Drewrys, their lawyer, and t
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991-05-06 · Published · cited 1× · 932 F.2d 342
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants, six inmates at the Lorton Reformatory, were convicted and sentenced for various offenses committed during a prison riot. All of the appellants contest their convictions. We affirm these convictions. Two of the appellants, Derrick Brown and William Smith, also challenge their sentences. We affirm Brown’s sentence but remand Smith’s case for re-sentencing for the reasons expressed herein.</
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991-04-24 · Published · cited 9× · 762 F. Supp. 1235; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5520; 1991 WL 64182
762 F.Supp. 1235 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. Clifton William BYARS, William Ernest Simms, Sandy Sims, Betty Carroll. Crim. No. 91-00079-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. April 24, 1991. *1236 Jay Apperson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., for U.S. James M. Lowe, Alexandria, Va.,
State v. McLaughlinpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009-08-18 · Published · cited 1× · 977 A.2d 1008; 2009 ME 90; 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20202; 2009 Me. LEXIS 95
ALEXANDER, J. [¶ 1] Jay R. McLaughlin appeals from the judgments of conviction entered in the Superior Court (Somerset County, Jabar, J.) following a jury-waived trial on one count of theft by deception (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 354(1)(B)(4) (2008), and one count of intentionally violating environmental protection laws (Class E), 38 M.R.S. §§ 349(1), 1306(1) (2008). McLaughlin argues that the court erred in: (1) de
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009-03-04 · Published · cited 30× · 673 S.E.2d 489; 53 Va. App. 505; 2009 Va. App. LEXIS 106
673 S.E.2d 489 (2009) 53 Va. App. 505 Rechell Lynn ROSE v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2762-07-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem. March 4, 2009. *490 B. Leigh Drewry, Jr. (Cunningham & Drewry, on brief), Lynchburg, for appellant. Benjamin H. Katz, Assistant Attorney General (Robert
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Mar 20 2024, 9:31 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
California Court of Appeal · 2016-02-18 · Published · cited 14× · 244 Cal. App. 4th 1281; 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 831; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 119
Opinion RICHMAN, J. Petitioners in this writ proceeding are Deirdre Hill and Vincent G. Hughes (collectively petitioners), co-executors of their mother’s estate. They filed a proceeding against their stepfather, Frank Staggers, Sr., to recover property belonging to the estate, which among other things requested a judgment for twice the value of the propert
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991-05-06 · Published · cited 8× · 932 F.2d 342; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8588
932 F.2d 342 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Richard BASSIL, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Derrick BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Marcus JAY, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Donnell HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.William S
Hill v. Super. Ct.public domain
California Court of Appeal · 2016-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/25/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO DEIRDRE HILL et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA A145893 COUNTY, (Alameda County Respondent;
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-02-24 · Published · cited 22× · 27 F.4th 405
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0035p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ALEX AUTRAN, administrator of the estate of Jean-Philippe
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2026-02-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 WY 16
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2026 WY 16 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2025 February 2, 2026 GUNWERKS, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. FORWARD CODY WYOMING, INC., a Wyoming non-profit corporation, Appellee S-25-0090 (Defendant and Counter/Cross-Claimant),
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 14, 2015 Session TENNESSEE FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY A/S/O KENNETH L. COUCH v. JACKSON MADISON SCHOOL SYSTEM BOARD OF EDUCATION Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C13114 Kyle Atkins, Judge ________________________________ No. W2014
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015-07-28 · Published · cited 1× · 535 B.R. 450; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 2599
ORDER ON DETROIT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION REGARDING ALLOCATION OF DAMAGES Wendy L. Hagenau, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge The “Detroit Plaintiffs” filed their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts II and IV [Docket No. 118] (“Motion”) and Motion Regarding Allocation of Damages [Docket No. 121] (“Allocation Motion”) following this Court’s' Order of Februar
New York Court of Appeals · 1993-10-14 · Published · cited 116× · 622 N.E.2d 288; 81 N.Y.2d 655; 602 N.Y.S.2d 788; 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3274
81 N.Y.2d 655 (1993) 622 N.E.2d 288 602 N.Y.S.2d 788 In the Matter of Max Cohen, Appellant, v. Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued September 9, 1993. Decided October 14, 1993. Irving W. Fein, New York City, for appellant. Florrie L. Werthei
Ostling v. Loringpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1994-09-07 · Published · cited 56× · 27 Cal. App. 4th 1731; 33 Cal. Rptr. 2d 391; 94 Daily Journal DAR 12661; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6931; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 912
27 Cal.App.4th 1731 (1994) 33 Cal. Rptr.2d 391 ERNEST E. OSTLING et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROBERT LORING, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. C015703. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. September 7, 1994. *1736 COUNSEL Eisen & Johnston, Jay-Allen Eisen, Marian M. Johnst
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976-06-15 · Published · cited 2× · 335 So. 2d 584
335 So.2d 584 (1976) Ferando MUNILLA and Norka Munilla, His Wife, Appellants, v. Armando PEREZ-COBO, Appellee. No. 75-1442. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 15, 1976. Rehearing Denied August 10, 1976. *585 Shorenstein & Lewis, Miami Beach, for appellants. A. Jay Cristol and Mic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Doe v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015-02-12 · Published · cited 3× · 167 N.H. 382; 111 A.3d 1077
Lynn, J. The petitioner, John Doe, appeals an order of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) granting summary judgment for the respondent, the State of New Hampshire, on the petitioner’s declaratory judgment action, which sought a ruling that RSA chapter 651-B is unconstitutional, as applied to him, because it violates the prohibition against retrospective laws and the Due Process Clause of the New Hampshire Constitution. <
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 9, 2000 Session TANYA TUCKER, ET AL. v. CAPITOL RECORDS, INC. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 98-2449-I Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr., Chancellor No. M2000-01765-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 6, 2001 In this two party action, the trial court certified three partial