⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jay Damron”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 206 F. App'x 241
PER CURIAM: Timothy Grimes appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grimes v. Red Onion State Prison, No. 7:05-cv-00036-SGW-MFU (W.D.Va. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument b
Carter v. Clinepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013-10-10 · Published · cited 9× · 2013 Ark. 398; 430 S.W.3d 22; 2013 WL 5570948; 2013 Ark. LEXIS 464
CLIFF HOOFMAN, Justice. 11Appellant M. Jay Carter appeals from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court awarding him $42,104.06 in attorney’s fees and costs against appellees, Ernie Cline and Karen Cline. We assumed jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 1 — 2(a)(7) as a second or subsequent appeal following an appeal that was d
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 313 S.W.3d 117; 2010 Ky. App. LEXIS 88; 2010 WL 1928150
313 S.W.3d 117 (2010) Ronald STEWART, Jr., Appellant, v. ELCO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. and Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Appellee. No. 2009-CA-000828-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. May 14, 2010. *118 Timothy R. McCarthy, Louisville, KY, for appellant. Jay Langenbahn, Cincinnati, OH, for appellee. Before DIXON and N
Stae v. Allenpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-08-13 · Published · cited 1× · 2018 Ohio 3240
[Cite as Stae v. Allen, 2018-Ohio-3240.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2017-A-0069 - vs - : JASON F. ALLEN, a.k.a. ALLEN,
District Court, D. Arizona · 2003-08-27 · Published · cited 3× · 281 F. Supp. 2d 1117; 2003 WL 22089441
281 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2003) SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION, a California corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CV-99-1294-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. August 27, 2003. *1118 *1119 *1120
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 238 W. Va. 596; 797 S.E.2d 573; 2017 WL 958598; 2017 W. Va. LEXIS 148
LOUGHRY, Chief Justice: The petitioner, Johnnie Ray Farley, appeals the October 13, 2015, 1 order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County denying his motion for a new trial subsequent to his jury conviction for murder in the first degree. The jury did not recommend mercy. The petition^ er alleges the circuit court committe
State v. Marshallpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-09-29 · Published · cited 3× · 2023 Ohio 3542
[Cite as State v. Marshall, 2023-Ohio-3542.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-22-1207 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202101068 v. Kenneth Marshall DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 518 So. 2d 463; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 217; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 114; 1988 WL 1474
CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge. In this appeal appellants challenge the forfeiture of a vehicle titled in the name of appellant Barbara Grubb and operated by appellant Jay Grubb when he struck and killed a pedestrian. The petition for forfeiture of the vehicle pursuant to sections 932.701 through 932.704, Florida Statutes (1985) alleged that the vehicle was used or intended to be used in violation of section 782.071, Florida S
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011-01-20 · Published · cited 3× · 247 P.3d 180; 226 Ariz. 297; 600 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6; 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 9
247 P.3d 180 (2011) Charles LEFLET; Carlos Bustamonte; and Cynthia Sampley, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; West American Insurance Company; The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company; American Fire & Casualty Insurance Company; Auto-Owners Insurance Company; Transportation Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company, Defendants/Appellees.<
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007-08-16 · Published · cited 42× · 165 P.3d 186; 216 Ariz. 208; 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 155
165 P.3d 186 (2007) Maxine BOHREER; Tricia King; Northern Virginia Funeral Choices, Inc., a foreign corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 06-0277. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. August 16, 2007. *187 Page & Hommel, L.L.P.
District Court, D. Wyoming · 1998-05-11 · Published · cited 2× · 5 F. Supp. 2d 1258; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8021; 1998 WL 279172
5 F.Supp.2d 1258 (1998) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff and Counter defendant, v. Rhonda WINSOR and Pat Sherwood, Defendants and counter claimants. No. 97-CV-187-J. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. May 11, 1998. Michael K. Davis, Yonkee & Toner, Sheridan, WY, Jay Gilbertz, Sheridan, WY, for State Farm Fire and Ca
District Court, D. Arizona · 2002-01-29 · Published · cited 3× · 205 F.R.D. 542; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1810; 2002 WL 169279
AMENDED ORDER SILVER, District Judge. At the November 28, 2001 hearing on the parties’ Daubert motions, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding all outstanding discovery issues and to file status reports by December 17, 2001 identifying all remaining unresolved discovery issues. As set forth in those status reports, there are four discovery matters fully briefed and pending before th
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996-07-09 · Published · cited 7× · 933 P.2d 1200; 188 Ariz. 132; 220 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 55; 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 144
188 Ariz. 132 (1996) 933 P.2d 1200 Lori A. OGDEN, a single person; Cherrie Perry, as Guardian/ Conservator for Tasha Ann Zeller, a minor; Peggy Klatt and William Zeller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a foreign corporation; Joseph Lichman and Jane Doe Lichman, husband and wife; J & M Steel Erecting, Inc.; Jay Soyko and Mary B. Soyko, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.</
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993-03-03 · Published · cited 15× · 815 F. Supp. 154; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2925; 1993 WL 61492
815 F.Supp. 154 (1993) CONSTITUTION BANK v. Anthony J. DiMARCO and Rose DiMarco, et al. Civ. A. No. 92-5670. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 3, 1993. *155 John M. Elliott, Mark Kearney, Elliott, Vanaskie & Riley, Blue Bell, PA, for Constitution Bank. Thomas C. Zielinski, Jeffrey E. Lalloway, Coze
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 31, 2012 Session CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE, ET AL. v. HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 09C403 Jacqueline S. Bolton, Judge No. E2011-01197-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JUNE 21, 2012 The plaintiffs in
Holtzman v. Baileypublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1986-04-14 · Published · cited 2× · 132 Misc. 2d 25; 503 N.Y.S.2d 473; 1986 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2631
OPINION OF THE COURT Gerald Adler, J. Upon the foregoing papers plaintiff, the District Attorney of Kings County, as claiming authority (CPLR 1310 [11]), moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 1317 (2) of the newly enacted *26CPLR article 13-A (Proceeds Of A Crime — Forfeiture), to confirm the ex parte order of attachment granted on September 26, 1985 (Bellar
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995-09-19 · Published · cited 14× · 63 F.3d 486; 1995 WL 507312
BATCHELDER, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which CONTIE, J., joined. JONES, J., concurred in the judgment. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. In this case of “Let’s you and him fight,” the trial court has been diverted from the real issues of the declaratory judgment action. Hospital Underwriting Group, Inc. (“HUG”) filed this action against Summit H
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005-03-10 · Published · cited 17× · 321 B.R. 640; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 396; 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 139; 2005 WL 627561
321 B.R. 640 (2005) In re I SUCCESSOR CORP., et al., (f/k/a Interliant, Inc., et al.), Debtor. Post-Confirmation Committee of Unsecured Creditors of I Successor Corp., et al. (f/k/a Interliant, Inc., et al.), Plaintiff, v. The Feld Group, Inc.; Mobius VI, LLC; Mobius Technology Ventures VI, LP; Contrado, Inc.; Charterhouse Group, Inc. (f/k/a Charterhouse Group, International, Inc.); Charterhouse Equity Partners III, L.P.; Softbank Technology
Beruan v. Frenchpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1976-03-30 · Published · cited 5× · 56 Cal. App. 3d 825; 128 Cal. Rptr. 869; 1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1406
56 Cal.App.3d 825 (1976) 128 Cal. Rptr. 869 JOSEPH R. BERUAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PAUL A. FRENCH et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. 46091. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. March 30, 1976. *826 COUNSEL Godfrey Isaac, Barbara Warner Blehr and Lawrence
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-08-24 · Published · cited 12× · 60 F.3d 415
60 F.3d 415 Charles E. ATTEBERRY; Janice Atteberry; Jack L. Avery;Neta Avery; Robert W. Balentine; Pamela Kay Balentine;Glenn E. Banks; Estate of John F. Barnard, Jr., deceased;Betty Jo Barnard; John M. Bates; Susan K. Bates; SydneyF. Baustian; Lovelle Baustian; Patricia J. Beck; CloviaJ. Beck; Richard D. Berry; Joyce A. Berry; Jeff D.Blakely; Dorothy R. Blakely; Hubert H. Blanchard; JaniveS. Blanchard;