Cases

Matter of Jaxon S. (Jason S.) (2019 NY Slip Op 02255) Matter of Jaxon S. (Jason S.) 2019 NY Slip Op 02255 Decided on March 22, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

219 S.W.3d 156 (2005) Everett Doyle WELCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 05-266. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 8, 2005. Orvin W. Foster, Mena, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., Maggie C.B. *157 Smith, Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge. 11 Borgnemouth Realty Company, Ltd., is the owner of immovable property situated in St. Bernard Parish. As a result of storm damage caused to the levee adjoining the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, the parish president by executive order commandeered the use of private property, including Borgnemouth’s, to obtain borrow material and to gain access for the repair and rehabilitation of the levees in the par

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. |¶ This is a commandeering case arising out of Hurricane Katrina. On May 18, 2007, Olivier Plantation, L.L.C.; Park Investments, Ltd.; and Morning Park, Inc. (collectively “Olivier”) commenced this suit against St. Bernard Parish (“St. Bernard”) and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District (“LBBLD”) seeking just compensation under the Louisiana Constitution. Olivier alleged that St. Bernard and LBBLD comma

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-14-00283-CV ___________________________ JERRY V. DURANT; JERRY DURANT, INC. D/B/A DURANT TOYOTA AND D/B/A JERRY DURANT TOYOTA; JERRY DURANT HYUNDAI, LLC; DOYLE MAYNARD; ROBERT G. COTE SR.; GARY MICHAEL DEERE; JERRY R

Eva M. Guzman, Justice After a decade of successful employment with Jerry Durant Auto Group, Andrew Anderson's employer offered him an oral deal to "buy in" to the business in exchange for undertaking management of two underperforming automobile dealerships. What seemed like the opportunity of a lifetime soon became Anderson's nightmare after he was falsely accused of taking illegal kic

WELCH, Judge, dissenting. The majority affirms Montana Jordan Windsor’s conviction for first-degree robbery at a CVS pharmacy. I disagree with the majority’s resolution of Issue I, regarding the trial court’s admission of collateral-bad-act evidence, and Issue II, regarding the trial court’s failure to give the jury a limiting instruction about that evidence. The State’s testimony established

FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Before the court is the appeal of a district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the ease. Defendants-Appellants argue that the court erred in remanding the case to state court. Plaintiff-Appellee moves to dismiss the case, arguing that removal was improper and that we lack jurisdiction to review the remand order.

GUIDRY, J. This is an appeal of a summary judgment dismissing claims of vicarious liability against an alleged tortfeasor's employer. For the following reasons, we affirm. *966FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 24, 2015, Rebecca Richey was traveling north on LA 10881

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The Texas Automobile Dealers Association (“TADA”) and some of its members appeal, 1 pursuant to Fed.R.CivP. 23(f), the conditional certification of a plaintiff class of millions of consumers who have purchased a car in Texas since 1994. Because the proposed class does not meet the requiremen

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CT-01055-SCT ROY HAL PARKER, JR., AS CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM MATTHEW ROSS, A VULNERABLE ADULT AND INCOMPETENT TO MANAGE HIS AFFAIRS; JAMES HAL ROSS, JR.; AND JASON HURDLE ROSS v. SUZANNE DICKSON ROSS, INDIVIDUALLY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE JAMES HAL ROSS REVOCABLE TRUST, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES HAL ROSS, AND AS MEMBER/MANAGER OF H AND S I, LLC, H & S II, LLC, H & S III, LLC, AND H & S I

CAMERON SOULE, ET AL. * NO. 2024-C-0267 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL WOODWARD DESIGN + * BUILD, LLC, HOUSTON FOURTH CIRCUIT CASUALTY COMPANY, ET * AL. STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO CIVIL DIST

McCALLUM, J. Gabriel Jackson was convicted in absentia of aggravated flight from an officer in violation of La. R.S. 14:108.1(C). Jackson was subsequently adjudicated as a third-felony habitual offender and sentenced to life imprisonment without the benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence. Jackson appeals his conviction and sentence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FA

McCALLUM, J. Gabriel Jackson was convicted in absentia of aggravated flight from an officer in violation of La. R.S. 14:108.1(C). Jackson was subsequently adjudicated as a third-felony habitual offender and sentenced to life imprisonment without the benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence. Jackson appeals his conviction and sentence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FA

10/30/2023 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 10, 2023 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. IVAN ASHLEY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 29525 Christopher V. Sockwell, Circuit Judge ___________________________________

OPINION BY DEL SOLE, P.J.: ¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting Appellees’ Petition for Award of Attorney’s Fees filed pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 2503(9). The award was based on the trial court’s conclusion that Appellants’ earlier conduct in bringing two actions against Appellees was vexatious. Our review of the matter does not support the trial court’s conclusion, and we reverse its order and vac

324 F.Supp.2d 242 (2004) Jason JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. Martin FOURNIER, et al., Defendant No. CIV.03-178-P-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 2, 2004. *243 Kelly A. McMorran, Thomas P. Peters II & Associates, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Jason Jordan, Plaintiff. Michael J. Schmidt, Wheeler & Arey, P.A., Water

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSE RUIZ (SC 20275) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus The defendant appealed to the Appellate Court from the trial court’s judg- ment revoking his probation following an incident in which he allegedly robbed and threatened W, a customer at a donut shop. A police officer had been dispatched to the donut shop after a report that a customer had been rob

Judgment rendered December 18, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,055-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA *****