Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jason Taylor”
Randall E. Burns v. Jason Taylorpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District RANDALL E. BURNS, ET AL., ) ) Appellants, ) WD81828 ) v. )
William Jason Taylor v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00261-CR William Jason Taylor § From the 396th District Court § of Tarrant County (1204597D) v. § December 13, 2012 § Opinion by Justice Meier The
Jason Taylor v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION VAIDIK, Chief Judge. Case Summary Jason Taylor pled guilty to a Class D felony and was sentenced to eighteen months all suspended to probation in August 2004. Under his plea agreement, he was permitted to petition the court to reduce his conviction to a Class A misdemeanor if he successfully completed his probation terms. Aft
William Jason Taylor v. Statepublic domain
02-11-261-CR
Rick D. Ganey v. Beth Granberry Cupstid (consolidated with) Jason Taylor Thornton v. Beth Granberry Cupstidpublic domain
Judgment rendered August 28, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,798-CA No. 55,799-CA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Jason K. Taylor v. Jessica Timmonspublic domain
LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Jason Taylor appeals the decision of the chancery court, alleging that the chancellor erred when he (1) found that Jessica Timmons was entitled to decide which school the child would attend; (2) modified his child-support obligation; (3) modified the visitation schedule; (4) found him in contempt for failure to make tim
LATOYA TAYLOR v. JASON MORRISpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, April 06, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22A0906. LATOYA TAYLOR et al. v. JASON MORRIS. Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
Taylor B. Jolley v. Jason N. Ellispublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Fulton, Lorish and White PUBLISHED Argued at Norfolk, Virginia TAYLOR B. JOLLEY OPINION BY v. Record No. 0870-23-1 JUDGE LISA M. LORISH OCTOBER 1
Taylor B. Jolley v. Jason N. Ellispublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Fulton, Lorish and White PUBLISHED Argued at Norfolk, Virginia TAYLOR B. JOLLEY OPINION BY v. Record No. 0870-23-1 JUDGE LISA M. LORISH OCTOBER 1
Jason D. Taylor v. Statepublic domain
LAMBERT, J. Following the denial of Appellant’s motion to withdraw his open plea, the trial court adjudicated Appellant guilty on the sole count of dealing in stolen property, a second-degree felony, 1 and sentenced him to serve ten years in prison, to be followed by four years of drug offender probation. In this dire
In the Matter of: Jason R. Taylorpublic domain
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2358 DisCip|inary DoCket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 2 DB 2017 v. : Attorney Registration No. 93330 JASON R. TAYLOR, : (Fayette County) Respondent ORDER PER CUR|AM AND NOW, this 16th day of l\/|arch, 2017, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Jason R. Taylor is placed on temporary suspension until further action loy this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He shall comply with the provisions o
In the Matter of: Jason R. Taylorpublic domain
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2358 Discip|inary DoCket No. 3 Petitioner : Nos. 2 DB 2017 and 13 DB 2017 v. : Attorney Registration No. 93330 JASON R. TAYLOR, : (Fayette County) Respondent ORDER PER CUR|AM AND NOW, this 27th day of Apri|, 2017, upon consideration of the Verified Statement of Resignation, Jason R. Tay|or is disbarred on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply With provisions
Eason v. Taylorpublic domain
STROUD, Judge. *17 Plaintiff appeals from an unusual order denying her claim for equitable distribution and awarding defendant attorney fees for having to defend the equitable distribution claim because "[t]his matter could have settled." For the following reasons, we affirm in part, vacate in
Taylor v. Arkansaspublic domain
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied. Same case below, 2010 Ark. 372, 372 S.W.3d 769.
United States v. Jason Daniel Taylorpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jason Daniel Taylor pled guilty to one count of possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). The district court adjudged him to be an armed career criminal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), because he had three prior convictions for violent felonies and sentenced him to 72 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by a five-year term of supervised release.
United States v. Jason Luntay Taylorpublic domain
BLACK, Circuit Judge: Jason Luntay Taylor appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by means of robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a); conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute at least 15 kilograms but less than 50 kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; possession of a firearm in re
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
JIM GUNTER, Justice. liAppellant appeals his convictions for capital murder and kidnapping, for which he received sentences of death and life imprisonment, respectively. On appeal, he argues that the circuit court erred in (1) denying his motion for directed verdict, (2) refusing to declare Christina Head an accomplice as a matter of law and refusing to submit the issue to the jury, (3) denying his moti
United States v. Jason Pylespublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Jason Lee Pyles pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court 1 co
Tina Rosen v. Jason McCobbpublic domain
CORRECTED OPINION PER CURIAM. The defendant petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari, challenging an order that overruled her objections to net worth interrogatories and requests to produce. 1 We grant the petition in part and deny in part. Following an altercation, th
State v. Taylorpublic domain
Affirmed without opinion.