Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “Jason E. Steagall”
Canopy v. Hentzpublic domain
JUSTICE SCHMIDT delivered the opinion of the court: A jury found for the defendant, Jason L. Hentz (Hentz), and against the plaintiff, Roberta J. Canopy (Canopy), in a personal injury action stemming from a two-vehicle motor vehicle accident. The trial court granted Canopy’s motion for a new trial. Because no jury demand was on file, a bench trial was held. The
In Re Galileo Corp. Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
127 F.Supp.2d 251 (2001) In re GALILEO CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION No. C.A. 98-12129-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 22, 2001. *252 *253 *254 Michael G. Lange, Jeffrey C. Block, Berman, DeValerio & Pease, Kathryn A. McElroy,
Smith v. Statepublic domain
HINES, Chief Justice. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, as amended, Herman Smith appeals his convictions for felony murder while in the commission of aggravated assault, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and carrying a weapon without a license, all in connection with the fatal shooting of Cardarius Steagall and an assault upon Chase
In re Adoption of J.R.J.public domain
[Cite as In re Adoption of J.R.J., 2019-Ohio-4701.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DARKE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION : OF J.R.J. (PROPOSED NAME AFTER : ADOPTION) : Appellate Case No. 2019-CA-12 :
Wilks v. Alexanderpublic domain
The sole issue in this case is whether the parties agreed to stipulate the facts and allow the judge to enter a judgment based on those "stipulations," even though those "stipulations" were not what the law generally defines as stipulations, but were, in actuality, statements of what each party considered the facts to be. The displeased party argues that the judgment was not proper, because, he says, the agreement was for the parties to "stipulate" the facts and, he says, in ac
Brewer v. Davispublic domain
The plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in a legal malpractice action. Linda Brewer, Mary E. Hill, and Gene Brown employed Lindsey Davis, a lawyer with the firm of Holt, McKenzie, Holt and Mussleman, to contest the will of Lois Brown, deceased. The will was admitted to probate on May 2, 1986. On August 4, 1986, Davis, on behalf of her clients, filed a petition to remove the estate to circuit *Page 68
Jones v. Power Cleaning Contractorspublic domain
This is an appeal of a summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The issues are whether a contractor and subcontractor may be held liable for the negligence of an independent contractor, and whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. FACTS In 1985, the University of North Alabama ("U.N.A.") requested bids for renovation of the University Fine Arts Complex. A contract was awarded to Sequoia Construction Company. Sequoia subcontrac
Christopher Rothman and his father, Michael J. Rothman, brought this action against the Gamma Alpha Chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity ("Gamma") and two individual members of Gamma, Jason Curry and Scott Byler. The complaint arose from an altercation that took place between Christopher and members of Gamma; it alleged assault and battery, conspiracy, outrage, and negligent conduct. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Gamma and made the judgment final pursuant to R
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Huglerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M. G. LYNN, CHIEF JUDGE Before the Court are the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 48, 51, 54, 67). On November 17, 2016, the Court held oral argument on the Motions. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Burkepublic domain
319 F.Supp.2d 275 (2004) WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., and Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. John P. BURKE, Banking Commissioner, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 3:03-CV-0738(JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 1, 2004. *276 *277 Daniel L. FitzMaurice, Jason S. Weathers, Day, Ber
Granberry v. Johnsonpublic domain
This is an appeal from a judgment upholding a conveyance of real estate; the *Page 928 action was to set aside the conveyance as fraudulent. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand. On January 9, 1983, 77-year-old Catherine Johnson had an automobile wreck; her vehicle collided with another vehicle occupied by Billy and Glenda Granberry and their son. All the parties suffered personal injuries. By the time this action came to t
Cowen v. M.S. Enterprises, Inc.public domain
Dr. Kimberly H. Cowen sued M.S. Enterprises, Inc.; Roy Robertson; Robertson and Associates, Inc.; and Dr. James Holland, alleging fraud. The case arose from an agreement between M.S. Enterprises and Cowen, pursuant to which Cowen operated a weight loss clinic and sold a weight loss supplement marketed by M.S. Enterprises. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The dispositive issue is whether, in support of their summary judgment motion, the defe
Silavent v. Silaventpublic domain
This appeal is from a decree modifying a divorce decree awarding custody of the parties' minor children. The principal question presented concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree of modification. Appellee takes the position, in which we concur, that this question cannot be considered since it affirmatively appears from the record that there was evidence before the trial court, consisting of the court's private examination of the two oldest children, which
Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Burkepublic domain
STRAUB, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant John P. Burke, in his official capacity as Banking Commissioner of the State of Connecticut (“the Commissioner”), appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, Judge) granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia Bank”), a nationally chartered bank, and its wholly owned, state-cha
Ex Parte Clarkpublic domain
This is a tragic case because it involves the inexcusable death of 15-year-old Jason Platt. While he was deer hunting, Jason was shot in the head, neck, and chest with buckshot fired from a shotgun. Arthur Charles Clark was charged with the shooting, was later convicted of manslaughter, and was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Clark's conviction without written opinion, Clark v. State,579 So.2d 707
Wachovia Bank v. Burkepublic domain
414 F.3d 305 WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. and Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.John P. BURKE, in his official capacity as Banking Commissioner of the State of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellant.Docket No. 04-3770-CV. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 31, 2005. Decided: July 11, 2005. COPYRIG
235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS